⁣





Normal
0




false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE





















































































































































































































































































































































































































/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:14.0pt;
font-family:"Lucida Fax",serif;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}



I’m not sure how I ran into this interesting interview of
Drs. Robert & Jill Malone because I don’t subscribe to NTD (https://www.ntd.com/). The sub-title: “Drs.
Robert and Jill Malone discussed how the internet became a battlefield, where
targeted content can steer how Americans vote, think, feel, and believe.”
The interview was posted on 9/7/2025, 8:00:21 AM EDT (https://tinyurl.com/zxa8tubj)
by Melina Wisecup.



NTD Description:



“Twitter was originally designed
as a weapon of war, and the same influence strategies once tested overseas are
now being deployed inside the United States, says Dr. Robert Malone.
Corporations, for example, have paid conservative influencers $1,000 per tweet
to derail policies they opposed, disguising coordinated campaigns as grassroots
opinion. In their new book "PsyWar: Enforcing the New World
Order," [From Amazon: https://tinyurl.com/544ccpvp]
Drs. Robert and Jill Malone argue that what was once developed for
foreign battlefields is now being turned inward, on U.S. citizens themselves.



The Malones describe how
military-style influence campaigns have been absorbed by Silicon Valley and now
dominate everyday marketing, media, and politics.



They highlight how coordinated
messaging—whether around COVID, climate change, or elections—is designed to
narrow the range of acceptable thought. As U.N. communications chief Melissa
Fleming said, “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it.”



The implications are serious.
“The idea of free and fair elections becomes completely obsolete,” according to
Robert Malone.



The Malones trace how repetition
and AI-driven targeting can steer not only how Americans vote—but what they
think, feel, and believe. Their warning is stark: the internet is now a
battlefield, and your mind is the prize.”