⁣Will the MAGA movement be split down the middle

I DON'T KNOW ABOUT WHERE YOU LIVE BUT HERE, WHERE I LIVE, I GO SHOPPING AND I CAN STILL SEE OUT OF 5 PEOPLE, AT LEAST TWO ARE STILL WEARING MASK IN 2025. EVEN WORSE, MORE THAN 90% WERE VACCINATED AND MANY OF THEM MORE THAN ONCE. NEEDLESS TO SAY THAT MANY ARE SICK, SOME VERY ILL AND THEY KEEP DYING UNEXPEDTEDLY...

⁣Cancel culture in Australia and how they cancelled Jamie McIntyre over a decade ago yet he fought back and succeeded

⁣If it’s always a predominant group of people on the planet causing the problems,shouldn’t we call them out regardless of slanderous attacks ?

⁣Dmitry Medvedev showed how, in his opinion, a buffer zone between Russia and Ukraine should look like...

The "buffer zone" in these shots occupies almost the entire territory of Ukraine, with the exception of a small area in the west.

Source: https://t.me/intelslava/75210

⁣RT's Rick Sanchez Uncovers the Trick: Phantom Diplomacy Used by the US and Israel to Catch Iran Off Guard

Source: https://t.me/rtnews/99403

⁣Rethinking Digital Identity: Is There a Path That Preserves Freedom?

I’ve always been, and still am, completely opposed to the idea of digital IDs as pushed by the WEF, the UN, the EU, and all the other unelected technocrats who seem to believe we were born to be tagged, tracked, and rated like livestock. The model they’re proposing is clear: a top-down surveillance tool wrapped in the language of “convenience,” which in reality serves one purpose only: to control. You don’t need to look any further than China’s social credit system to understand where this is headed. A digital ID that links to your digital wallet, your vaccine status, your online behaviour, your biometric data… that’s not innovation, that’s a prison.

We can’t afford to shy away from technology, nor pretend it isn’t the direction the world is moving in. Technology is the future. It always has been. But like every tool that’s ever shaped civilisation, it’s a double-edged sword. Fire can cook your food, or burn your house down. A sword can protect the innocent, or serve a tyrant. And the same applies here. The question is never just what the tool is, but who’s holding it, and what their intentions are.

So it’s not about rejecting technology outright. It’s about insisting that it serves us. That it enhances life without compromising our humanity. That it protects our privacy, preserves our freedom, and respects our sovereignty, instead of eroding it.

And that’s why I want to ask:
What if the concept of a digital ID wasn’t inherently evil, but it simply depended on who controlled it?

In a recent interview, Charles Hoskinson (founder of Cardano) spoke about an entirely different kind of digital identity—one built not by the state, but by the individual. A decentralized, blockchain-based system where you own your credentials, you decide what information is shared and when, and you hold the keys, not some centralized authority with backdoor access to every aspect of your life. No intermediaries, no corporate gatekeepers, no state surveillance. Just a secure, private way to authenticate who you are, on your terms.

In a world that’s moving rapidly toward digital infrastructure whether we like it or not, maybe the real battle isn’t whether digital identity exists, but how it exists, and who it serves.

Imagine being able to prove your age without sharing your birthdate. Imagine accessing services without exposing your location or biometric data. Imagine a future where your digital interactions are verifiable, but your personal data is never surrendered. That’s not what the globalists want, but it is what certain blockchain technologies are trying to create.

So maybe the question isn’t: “Are you for or against digital IDs?” Maybe it’s: “Are you for centralized control or individual sovereignty?”

Because those two cannot coexist.

And if we don’t build the infrastructure for freedom, rest assured, they will build the infrastructure for control.

Source: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/73838

⁣Russian Police Apprehend a Migrant Wielding a Knife on a Busy Moscow Highway

Onlookers demand the policemen shoot the migrant but the police use non lethal measures to eventually detain the man.

If this was in America or Australia the cops would have not hesitated to shoot him on the spot.

Source: https://t.me/AussieCossack/40051

OUR DAILY OLDIES

⁣Why Aussies Are Leaving & Choosing A New Life In Bali/Lombok

In this video I am joined by Jamie McIntyre to discuss why so many Australians are now choosing to leave Australia for a new life in Bali & Lombok. We also take a look at Jamie's new project building a city from scratch in Lombok & the range of villas available.

To join our premium research platform & community: https://nuggetsnews.com.au

#Australia #Bali #Lombok

Source: https://x.com/NuggetsNewsAU/st....atus/198299636370208

⁣Rachel Reeves turned the screw on Britain with another huge tax assault today - as she splashed ever-more cash on benefits.

In farcical scenes at Westminster, an ashen-faced Chancellor was left scrambling after her crucial package was accidentally put online before she even had a chance to deliver it to MPs.

The state will be 39% of GDP.
In Communist China its 26% - In Communist Venezuela its 11%.

Taxes up, welfare spending up and £1.8 billion for digital ID

Labour is literally diverting money away from sorting out the border crisis to taking away British people’s liberty.

Source: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/78095

⁣Zelensky's Face, Fear and Anxiety as Trump Talks about Ukraine's Wealth

Zelensky realises that Trump and Putin will be the ones exploiting Ukraine's wealth after Zelensky is gone.

Source: https://t.me/AussieCossack/44973

⁣HILLARY CLINTON CAUGHT IN ANOTHER BOLD-FACED LIE about Epstein ties, here are the documented FACTS she’s desperately trying to bury

• She claimed: “We have no links… Bill took a few rides on the airplane.”
But the records PROVE otherwise:

1. Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s Lolita Express at least 26 times (flight logs released in court docs & Ghislaine Maxwell trial evidence).

2. Multiple trips included stops on Little St. James island, Epstein’s infamous pedophile playground.

3. Photos exist of Bill Clinton with Epstein & young girls at various events (widely published & never disputed).

4. Virginia Giuffre (Epstein victim) stated under oath that Bill Clinton was on the island and part of the scene (though she didn’t accuse him of wrongdoing).

5. Hillary herself was photographed with Epstein at multiple events, including one at her own home.

“No links”? Try deep, repeated, documented links, flights, photos, island visits. “A few rides” is the understatement of the century!

Source: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/81465

⁣Why Does Success Enrage Some People?
By Jamie McIntyre

There is an old saying: Success is the best revenge.

It is a phrase that has stood the test of time because history repeatedly shows that genuine success often attracts not only admiration, but also extraordinary resentment.

The psychology behind this is fascinating.

Most people celebrate achievement when it belongs to someone they don’t know. They applaud successful entrepreneurs, athletes and innovators from afar. But when success comes from a direct

competitor, a former associate, or someone they once dismissed, that admiration can quickly transform into jealousy, envy and even anger.

Why?

Because success destroys excuses.

It forces people to confront an uncomfortable possibility: perhaps someone else simply worked harder, persisted longer, made better decisions, or delivered a better product.

For some personalities, admitting that is simply too painful.

Instead, they attack the successful person.

Rather than building something better, they attempt to tear down what already exists.

That pattern has played out repeatedly throughout history and continues today.

LUX Property Group provides an interesting case study.

Against significant challenges, the company has continued completing villas, opening accommodation, progressing hotels and expanding developments across Bali and Lombok.

Every completed villa.
Every finished swimming pool.
Every hotel room handed over.
Every satisfied guest.

Each milestone becomes physical evidence that the business is delivering.

Ironically, those achievements appear to have intensified criticism from some quarters rather than reduced it.

That should not surprise anyone familiar with human nature.

Words are easy.

Concrete, steel, glass and completed buildings are much harder to argue with.

When one organisation continues producing visible results while others make increasingly ambitious claims without an equivalent completed track record, comparisons naturally begin to emerge.

Markets eventually judge performance by outcomes rather than promises.

The real lesson extends far beyond property development.

Throughout business, politics and sport, there are people who dedicate years to mastering their craft.

Then there are others who seek shortcuts.

Instead of earning trust over decades, they try to acquire it overnight.

Instead of outperforming competitors, they attempt to discredit them.

Instead of creating value, they focus on capturing someone else’s customers.

Psychologists sometimes describe this as a threat response.

When another person’s achievements challenge someone’s self-image, the easiest emotional defence is to diminish the achiever rather than improve oneself.

That often explains why successful people are subjected to rumours, smear campaigns and personal attacks.

The attacks are rarely about facts alone.

They are frequently about emotion.

Ironically, such attacks can become an unintended compliment.

People generally do not spend enormous amounts of time attempting to undermine organisations they view as insignificant.

They focus on those they perceive as genuine competitors or emerging leaders.

None of this means successful businesses are above scrutiny.

Every company should expect questions, criticism and accountability.

Healthy competition benefits consumers and raises standards across an industry.

But there is a clear distinction between fair competition and attempts to damage another business through campaigns driven by rivalry rather than performance.

The marketplace has a remarkably effective way of sorting these matters over time.

Customers visit the developments.

Investors inspect completed projects.

Guests stay in the accommodation.

Photos become reality.

Buildings either exist or they do not.

In the end, concrete speaks louder than commentary.

Perhaps that is why success can provoke such powerful reactions.
Success is difficult to argue with.

Source: https://x.com/jamiemcintyre21/....status/2071031065544