⁣Questa canzone l'ascoltai per la prima volta nel 1998. Qualche settimana fà mi ricordai di questa bella canzone e la cercai ma senza risultati. Mi sono dovuto rimboccare le maniche e registrarla io. Il mio desiderio che tu possa fare tue le promesse di Dio nella tua vita.
Questa canzone è pubblicata anche nei miei seguenti canali.
https://truthtube.video/@UCsZGjqQvtuL...
Telegramma: Eliseo Paterniti Canal
https://truthsocial.com/@UCsZGjqQvtuL...
Per contattarmi puoi usare i seguenti contatti.
E-mail: eliseo.paterniti@alice.it
facebook: Eliseo Paterniti
Instagram: Eliseo Paterniti
https://youtu.be/csF_h_1y_08?feature=shared

➖ARTICLES TO READ➖

https://threads.truthparadigm.tv

➖VIDEO CREDITS➖

https://videocredits.truthparadigm.tv


➖
Proverbs 12:17: He Lockdowns speaks truth declares righteousness,
But a false witness, deceit
➖

🧿 RELAY BY 🧿
■ http://truthparadigm.news
■ https://shows.truthparadigm.tv

➖
💎TREASURE💎
■ https://tinyurl.com/IvermectinResources
■ https://cspoa.org
■ https://www.j6truth.org/
■ https://thepatriotlight.com/
■ https://www.devolution.link
■ https://covid19criticalcare.com
■ https://reawakeningseries.com
■ https://ministry.truthparadigm.tv
■ https://ministry.truthparadigm.news
■ http://truthparadigm.net
➖

#AI #ElectricVehicles #Globalists #FacialRecognition #Fetterman #DigitalID #GreatReset #WEF #Biden #Pandemic #Covid #Vaccines #Plandemic #NWO #Cabal #ClimateChange #Australia #God #ConstitutionalFreedoms #Religion #ExcessDeaiths #Feminism #Lockdowns #Covfefe #Freedom

🚨 READ LINK 🚨
https://www.thecentersquare.co....m/national/article_3
➖
Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor
May 2023
➖


🔎 LEARN, READ, WATCH MORE 🔍

■ https://leo.truthparadigm.tv

■ https://leo.truthparadigm.news


#LawEnforcement #PublicSafety #Immigration #BorderCrisis #Truth

⁣Tecknat Barn Svenska:Tintin i piraternas våld (1961) DVDRIPPEN (Franska) Hela Filmen (HD)

➖ARTICLES TO READ➖

https://threads.truthparadigm.news

➖VIDEO CREDITS➖

https://videocredits.truthparadigm.tv


➖
Proverbs 12:17: He StewPeters speaks truth declares righteousness,
But a false witness, deceit
➖

🧿 RELAY BY 🧿
■ http://truthparadigm.news
■ https://shows.truthparadigm.tv

➖
💎TREASURE💎
■ https://tinyurl.com/IvermectinResources
■ https://cspoa.org
■ https://www.j6truth.org/
■ https://thepatriotlight.com/
■ https://www.devolution.link
■ https://covid19criticalcare.com
■ https://reawakeningseries.com
■ https://ministry.truthparadigm.tv
■ https://ministry.truthparadigm.news
■ http://truthparadigm.net
➖

#Pharma #myocarditis #FDA #CHD #Bible #PeterMcCullough #WHO #Covid #Vaccines #NEJM #VascularSystem #God #VaccineInjuries #VAERS #NaomiWolf #Truth #StewPeters #Covfefe #Freedom

⁣BRICSTether, the alternative to USDT and 100% asset-backed stablecoin, goes live on another exchange - this time Coinsbit, as more look to flee the USD and US collapsing banks

BRICSTether, the alternative to USDT and 100% asset-backed stablecoin goes live on another exchange - this time Coinsbit, after launching recently on Azbit. It will soon be added to even larger exchanges and launch its own in BRICSTX exchange. You can earn up to 10% PA, if held for 12 months, or 5% if held for 90 days. 100% asset-backed.

A release by Coinsbit Exchange was made just now.

“Congratulations, your token is listed on coinsbit.io. This is just the beginning of our fruitful cooperation
https://coinsbit.io/trade_classic/BRICST_USDT “

BRICSTether.com
@tetherbrics on Twitter

⁣#HereIsTheEvidence

⁣What is going to happen to the Australian Property Market? Should I sell or should I buy? Part 2

⁣#HereIsTheEvidence

⁣The narrator was nervous and excited as he waited for the Tennessee staff to arrive. They discussed the Mary Phagan Leo Frank case and how the evidence came to light. One of the reporters, Jerry Thompson, explained that he worked undercover with the KKK for over a year and crafted a story about the current KKK. When they found out he was a reporter, they hired security guards to protect him and his home. Alonzo Mann's nephew, Bob Mann, told Jerry that his uncle had witnessed a murder in Atlanta in 1913, but gave no further details. Intrigued, Jerry consulted a publisher, who agreed to publish a series of stories about the sentencing of innocent people. At the time, the series was considered low profile, but Jerry had never heard of Mary Phagan or Leo Frank. Jerry met a rabbi who mentioned Leo Frank and the story took precedence. Alonzo Man liked Leo Frank and was relieved by Frank's commutation. Newspaper staff invited the author to a press conference on April 1 at the Jewish Community Center in Atlanta. The authors agreed but requested anonymity. The room was a typical conference area, filled with reporters who were either invited to be present or interested in the case. The state of Tennessee and its officials were skeptical that the author would make any statements and had no idea what he was going to present to the Jewish community, so they agreed that anonymity was best. As they entered the room, the Tennessee staff asked the author to sit next to them. Tennessee reporters Jerry Thompson and Robert Sherborne introduced the Jewish community to a review of the evidence of Leo Frank's innocence. Most of the questions concerned the effect of Alonzo Mann's affidavit as the missing evidence conclusively proving Leo Frank's innocence. One of the questions concerned the Phagan family, and Jerry Thompson said that some members of the Phagan family continued to believe in the guilt of convicted Leo Frank, while others tried to be objective. Stated. The author tried to be objective, but found it difficult to do so because of the emotion involved. The meeting was called off on the grounds that Leo Frank's posthumous pardon would likely cause problems for the gubernatorial election. The speaker acknowledged that Jerry Thompson and Robert Sherborne, in presenting evidence to the Jewish community, concluded that Alonzo Mann's conclusions were true and could not be so objective. rice field. The speaker's grandfather and father kept telling the story of young Mary Phagan, and always told of Leo Frank's conviction for murdering her. How could the speaker reconcile her two opinions?On April 4, just three days after the press conference, her youngest brother Michael died. The speaker was the oldest and he was the youngest, but they both respected each other more than he thought.

⁣Michael went through many difficult times in his life, but his family supported him. His death devastated his family, but they never stopped loving him. Michael was buried next to his grandfather and the family laid flowers at each grave. An article appeared in the East Cobb Neighbor newspaper near Marietta on April 6. Jewish leaders are seeking ways to secure the posthumous innocence of Leo Frank, a fin-de-siècle Atlanta businessman who was convicted and lynched in the murder of Marietta. Witnesses in the case now say Frank killed. don't commit. One of the three journalists who covered the apparent new developments in the 69-year-old's case said he was willing to help clear Frank's name. Tennessee revealed in a copyright filing released last month that 82-year-old Bristol, Virginia resident Alonzo Mann said Frank's employees actually killed 14-year-old Mary Phagan. made it The April 1913 murder of a young girl at the National Pencil Company in Atlanta started her one of the most sensational legal episodes of the century. A key detail in this text is the twist in the Frank case that has once again thrown the Atlanta community into turmoil. Sherry Frank, who is independent of Leo Frank, the regional director of the American Jewish Commission, said Jewish leaders want Frank's possible innocence to be an issue in this year's gubernatorial election. said there is.

Gerald Cohen, vice president of the Atlanta Jewish Federation, said the new twist in the Frank case has set the Atlanta community back on its heels. Sherry Frank, no relation to Leo Frank, area director of the American Jewish Committee, said Jewish leaders would like to make a possible exoneration of Frank an issue in the gubernatorial race this year. Gerald Cohen, vice president of the Atlanta Jewish Federation, said the new twist in the Frank case has set the Atlanta community back on its heels. Sherry Frank, no relation to Leo Frank, area director of the American Jewish Committee, said Jewish leaders would like to make a possible exoneration of Frank an issue in the gubernatorial race this year. Gerald Cohen, vice president of the Atlanta Jewish Federation, said the new twist in the Frank case The most important details in this text are that the speaker witnessed two conflicting cultures in the Jewish Community Center in Atlanta: a mass of people convinced that one of their brothers was brutally and unjustly lynched, and a small woman who bears not only the name but also the face and figure of an aunt that she will never know. The speaker also felt her devotion to her family and heritage, which would always carry the burden of the senseless slaughter of a beautiful girl. The speaker also met with Mr. Siegon Thaler, who expressed concern and curiosity about the speaker's response to the recurrence of the Phagan-Frank affair. He promised that if the chair decided to issue a public statement on the matter, he would respond immediately around the world. An important detail of this text is that Tennessee reprints the narrator's or father's statements, such as Frank's belief in guilt or innocence and his reaction to new evidence in Alonzo Mann's testimony. The narrator is surprised when John makes a final suggestion that breaks the cardinal rules of journalism.

⁣The narrator was convinced he had a new friend in Nashville who wanted to feel this story in his heart. The narrator felt sorry for the narrator and knew not to ask anything that would make them uncomfortable. This letter also made the narrator see something else in himself.
⁣
⁣Mary Phagan was fighting her legacy at the Atlanta Jewish Community Center when she read and reread her brother's letter. She wrote Sandra to tell her of her brother's death and reiterated that she would not make a public statement concerning Alonzo Mann's affidavit at that time. Sandra responded with a warm and sympathetic letter. Sherry Condor, a librarian at Georgia State Library and Archives, did her master's thesis on Governor Sleighton and knows a lot about the case. Mary apologized for Michael's death and asked if and when she decides to say something, please let the Tennessean have a little warning.

While reading through the newspaper articles she'd collected, she came across the name Mike Wing, a member of the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles. Mike Wing was shocked to learn that there were surviving close family members of Mary Phagan, and that the family was anxious to be notified of any information brought before the media. He asked to be informed if an application for a posthumous pardon for Leo Frank was received, as it would ensure that if the story broke, he was responsive during the conversation. He was curious about the fact that the Phagan family had never publicly acknowledged themselves, and explained that the murder had been a deeply traumatic event whose reverberations still felt. He said he felt certain an application would be filed.

He took Mary Phagan's address and phone number and those of her father's. The most important details in this text are that the narrator had called Mike Wing and felt confident that if he did indeed receive a posthumous pardon application for Frank, he would inform them. However, the narrator's brother's death continued to cloud their life and they began to ask themselves questions about why he died and what the true value and purpose of their life was. In August, the narrator was the matron of honor and Amy's wedding. Amy and the narrator had remained close friends after the narrator left Florida, and Amy was there for the narrator when Michael died. The wedding was a beautiful Jewish ceremony, and the narrator learned many new things. The love and happiness shared was a healing force for the narrator.

⁣A new Fulton County grand jury was sworn in Monday morning by Judge W.D. Ellis, underscoring the need for immediate and vigorous attention to the Mary Phagan case. Leo M. Frank was the first witness called to recount where he was and what he was doing on the day of the murder. The only other witnesses questioned that afternoon were Mr. and Mrs. Emile Selig, where the Franks lived. Frank testified that he had previously lived in Brooklyn, New York, and that he left Brooklyn in October 1907, went abroad and returned to the United States, where he worked for the National Pencil Company, where he became Superintendent General. He described how he came to the factory as usual on Saturday morning and how business as usual continued until noon at the factory.

It was a public holiday and there were only 11 people in the factory, which made his job somewhat easier. An important detail in this document is that the stenographer, Dr. Hall, and the clerk, Alonzo Mann, left the building shortly after 12:00 when Frank began copying the order into the shipping request. When the murdered girl appeared and took the envelope, Mr. Frank handed it to her knowing that an employee would come for it. Frank admits he looked up Mary Phagan's phone number since the murder, but forgot it again. He didn't record the payment on his payslip or other records because he didn't need to.

The girl went and asked if the metal came. He said the Phagan child has not been operational since Monday due to metal supply shortages. There was $20 in the child's pay sack, part of which was from work the previous Friday and Saturday. He didn't know what her salary was because he didn't open her seal when she left. Hearing her footsteps fade into her corridor, he thoughtlessly went back to her work.

The document's most important detail is the events leading up to Mary Phagan's assassination. Witness Frank identified the girl by her number and did not fill in her payslip after handing over her envelope. He then made the startling remark that, five or ten minutes after Mary Phagan left, Leme Quinn, the head of the chip department, walked into his office and had a little chat with him. Frank then went to the fourth floor and found two boys who had worked in the factory, Harry Denham, Arthur White and Mrs. White. Then he went home and spent the rest of the afternoon at work.

He explained on his financial papers that Lee had arrived in the early afternoon and told him to come back.
After Negro returned, Gant came to pick up the shoes. Then he went home and called Lee at the factory. Then he went to bed at eleven o'clock. And he continued to talk about what happened the following Sunday. When investigators ordered him to interrogate the black man and extract a confession, Frank said he told security he knew you knew something.

⁣Frank testified that he was unruffled by the grilling and bombardment of questions he had received. Emile Salig and his wife, Mrs. Josephine Salig, followed Frank on the witness stand. The inquest adjourned until 930 Thursday morning. Six witnesses testified, including Boots Rogers, Lemmie Quinn, Miss Corinthia Hall, Miss Hattie Hall, and J. L. Watkins and Miss Daisy Jones.

Boots Rogers testified that Mr. Frank had changed the tape in the time clock while the officers were in the factory Sunday morning after the body of Mary Phagan had been found, and that he stated at the time as the sheet he took from the clock seemed to be correct. J. L. Watkins and Miss Daisy Jones put through a searching examination by the coroner in an effort to break down Frank's statement that he had visited the factory on the day of the tragedy. The most important details in this text are that Miss Corinthia Hall, an employee in the factory, testified that Mr. Frank's treatment of the girls in the factory was unimpeachable and that she had met Lemme Quinn at a restaurant near the factory near the noon hour Saturday. J. L. Wattkins testified that he had mistaken Miss Daisy Jones for Mary Phagan when he thought he saw her on the street near her home on Saturday afternoon at about 5:00 p.m Eastern Standard Time.

Detective Harry Scott of the Pinkerton Agency was one of the first witnesses called, and he testified that Herbert Haas, one of Frank's attorneys, had requested him to withhold all evidence from the police until Haas himself had considered it. Detective John Black followed Scott on the stand and told of finding a bloody shirt at Lee's home on the Tuesday afternoon following the murder. Newt Lee was recalled to the stand and said that when he and Frank conversed together at the police station that Frank told him if you keep that up, your story, Newt will both go to hell. Frank was recalled to the stand and testified in The most important details in this text are the character witnesses who testified in the Phagan case. Miss Nellie Wood of Eight Corporate Street and Mrs. C. D. Donaghan of 165 West 14th Street testified that Frank had come to her and put his hands on her when it was not called for, that he was too familiar and she didn't like it, and that Frank had tried to pass it off as a joke.

Coroner Donohue began to deliver his charge to the jury, saying that they had heard the statement of the county physicians, seen what caused death, seen the body and heard the evidence in the case. The coroner's jury in the case of Mary Phagan's death was tasked with investigating the cause of death and determining who is guilty of the murder. The jury was also responsible for holding witnesses who were essential in trying the case, and for committing anyone who was concealing information. The six men forming the jury filed one by one out of the door, and the crowd waited for 20 minutes before the foreman stood up and announced the verdict. The coroner's jury had a duty to inquire diligently as to how Mary Phagan came to her death and to determine at whose hands death came.

The coroner's jury ruled that Mary Phagan had been strangled and recommended that pencil factory manager Leo M. Frank and her night watchman Newt Lee be detained for a grand jury autopsy. Frank was reading the afternoon newspaper in Tower Hall when the news broke. He declined to comment further, but Newt Lee was clearly shocked when the news broke. When the news came in, he looked defeated and very depressed.

⁣A key detail in the audiobook is that Frank's mother said that anyone who knew his writing should be able to identify it, and that the man put up to prove Frank's writing was so afraid of injury that he wouldn't identify the writing. He also showed nervousness when he went to run the elevator, nail up the door, talk to the police, and ride to the station. He also showed frivolity when he was waiting for Old Jim to come back to burn the body, such as laughing and joking and trying to read a story that resulted in annoyance to the people in the card game. The text ends with a message from Tonte, the German for aunt, wishing Frank and Tonte a safe journey home. The most important details in this text are that Frank wrote a letter to his uncle on Saturday the 26th, which shows that he anticipated that the old gentleman who runs the cigar business had wealthy people in Brooklyn.

He also wrote a sentence that bears the earmarks of the guilty conscience tremulous as he wrote it. This sentence was written when he knew that the body of little Mary Phagan, who died for virtue's sake, lay in the dark recesses of that basement. This shows that the dastardly deed was done in an incredibly short time, and that the phrase penned by the man to his uncle on Saturday afternoon didn't come from a conscience that was its own accuser. The most important details in this text are that Leo M. Frank is an eminent authority who believes that unusual, unnecessary, unexpected and extravagant expressions are always earmarks of fraud, and that the old man cared nothing for the veterans who braved the chilly weather to do honor to their fallen comrades. This is significant because today was Yontif holiday and the thin, gray lines of veterans braved the rather chilly weather to do honor to their fallen comrades.

Leo M. Frank is a statistician and the millionaire, or nearly so, who cared so little about the thin, gray line of veterans but cared all for how much money had been gotten in by the pencil factory. There was something startling in the factory within the space of 30 minutes, and the letter was written in the morning. Do you believe it? The most important details in this text are that a rich uncle, Leo M. Frank, was living in Brooklyn and had at least $20,000 in cold cash out on interest. His brother in law was the owner of a store employing two or three people, and if the uncle wasn't in Brooklyn, he was so near there that even Frank himself thought he was there. On April 28, Frank wired Adolf Montague in care of the Imperial Hotel, telling him that a factory girl was found dead Sunday morning in a cellar of the pencil factory, where he placed her and expected her to be found.

⁣The incidents leading up to the murder of a factory girl discovered dead in a pencil factory cellar on April 28th are the most crucial details in this text. Montague received a call on Monday, April 28th, from a man saying that his company had the case well under control and that the police would eventually crack the case.

Additionally, he informed Montague that Scott could have obtained the slush fund if it had been present because his firm had the case under control. Haas countered that there might have been something else if Scott had accepted that advice. This implies that something else might have happened if Scott had accepted Haas' suggestion.


Despite what Joe Darter Schiff swore when he realized he had to confront Miss Fleming's evidence, this evidence demonstrates that Frank did not fix the financial sheet on Saturday morning. Frank got up on the stand and realized that his case was weak because he wasn't happy with all the evidence that was being presented about what he had done. He wrote that statement, and he was as intelligent as either of his attorneys. With his statement, Frank attempted to introduce something for which they lacked any supporting evidence after realizing that he had to go above and beyond what the evidence showed. He was aware that the claims made about how long it would take to correct the financial sheet were untrue. The jurors' testimony in the case of Frank Arnold constitutes the most significant details in this text. The evidence consists of both documentary proof that a man is guilty and proof that a person lied under oath, as in the case of a man who was called to identify a piece of writing as being by Frank but who was unable to do so despite Frank's own mother swearing that he could have done so.

Mrs. Carson's testimony about her three years of factory work is also included, and Mr. Arnold's testimony is not made under oath. Last but not least, there is testimony from Mr. Arnold who is not under oath regarding the three years of work Mrs. Carson performed in the factory. The text ends by stating that justice must be served and that the man who carried out the heinous act has received the same punishment from God that he received for what he did to this helpless little girl.

The two most crucial facts in this passage are that the woman had a conversation with Jim Conley on Tuesday morning and that she had noticed blood spots in her dressing room three or four times over the course of three years. On Tuesday morning, between 9 and 11:30, she also saw Leo M. Frank on the fourth floor.
Between the same hours, Jim Conley and Leo M. Frank were both on the woman's floor, and she spoke with both of them. Even if these men had intended to suborn perjury, the woman thinks that Conley could not have been made to do it. ⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that Jim Conley and Frank were both on the same floor, and that Jim was doing exactly what he claimed he was doing—sweeping.

⁣Frank and Conley were standing in front of the elevator when Frank went down the steps. Conley was still standing there with his hand on the thing when Frank passed him. Mrs. Small testified that the elevator shakes the whole building, but you can't notice it unless you are close to it. She said if there was hammering and knocking, you could still hear the elevator if you got close to it. Nobody disputed that.

The blood on the second floor piqued Mrs. Carson's interest, Miss Rebecca's mother. Jim Conley was anxious to get the newspapers, according to Mrs. Small, because he was aware of some information that he wanted to see how black people looked.

Then Mr. Arnold posed a query to Mrs. Carson that would be addressed to all of the female employees of the fourth floor. The two women named Miss Kitchens and Mrs. Small—each of whom received a raise of five cents four months ago—are the most significant details in this text.

Jim Conley's claim that Mrs. Small was up there on Tuesday between 8 and 9 a.m. is also supported by Mrs.
Small. Mr. Rosser called the assertion that Mr. Frank asked Jim Conley to hide the crime as being a "dirty assertion," but Mr. Rosser accepts it as being true. The text also mentions Mr. Rosser's acceptance of the notion that Mr. Frank asked Jim Conley to cover up the crime and expected him to do so as a dirty suggestion. The most crucial information in this text is that Jim Conley was brought into the courtroom by him, at which point a jury of upright men tied a rope around his neck. Jim claims that when he first saw him down there following the crime, he asked him, "Have you seen anyone go up?".


He claimed to have seen two girls ascend, but only one return. Given that he was aware that Jim was on the lookout for both him and Starnes, Campbell, and Black taken together, this man saw the absolute necessity of confiding in Jim. Jim made an effort to defend himself, but the suggestion was impure. The most crucial information in this passage is that Mrs. Small saw Leo Frank on the fourth floor between 8:00 and 9:00 on Tuesday morning, and the other woman saw him between 9:00 and 11:00. It took some time for the police to gain the nerve and the courage to face the situation and place him where he belonged because of the intimidation and fear Frank's influence caused them to feel when it came to assigning him to a cell like they did Lee and Conley. It took some time for the police force to gather enough courage to deal with the situation and place him where he belonged because they were initially intimidated and terrified by Frank's influence to confine him to a cell like they did Lee and Conley. The most crucial information in this text is that John Black and Mr. Rosser achieved great success thanks to Leo M. Frank; if Black had been given the chance to pursue Frank, this trial might have been avoided and a confession might have been obtained.

This trial might have been avoided and a confession might have been obtained if Black had been given the chance to pursue Leo M. Frank. Black's methods were comparable to Rosser's methods. The Atlanta police department gave this man who killed that young girl undue consideration and allowed shrewd advice and the allure of power and wealth to dissuade them.

They respect the approach they took in tracking down Manola McKnight, but if they believe that apprehending a young girl's murderer in broad daylight is a lady's affair and that detectives should behave like dancing masters, they are ignorant of the nature of the work. The most crucial information in this text is that John Starnes and Campbell were aware that Albert McKnight would never have told Craven what he saw and what his wife had told him, and that if Mr. Dot Haas had approached him on Tuesday morning and asked him to tell the police to let Frank go, he would have responded, "It's none of my business.". He is criticized for entering the situation at the outset and refusing to take a backseat while serving as Solicitor General for the duration of the term for which he was chosen by the people. He respects Mr. Dot Hill and is equally pleased to have succeeded him as he is to have been chosen by the residents of this community for the position of Solicitor General. He obeys his own conscience's directives. The most significant information in this text is that the Solicitor General is proud of the fact that he worked closely with the detectives to find Mary Phagan's killer and that he resolutely refused to yield to the grand jury's pressure to hang an innocent man. Additionally, he wishes that Mr. Dot Hill had been present to deliver the speech he is doing right now, as he was as honorable as any Roman, as brave as Julius Caesar, and as articulate as Demosthenes.

In his final discussion of the subject, the Solicitor General asserts that everyone is a liar and that they are all "crack brain fanatics" without providing any specific examples. On Tuesday between 8:00 and 9:00, according to Mrs.dot Small, she saw Jim Conley and Mr.dot Frank in the factory's back area. When Mr. Conley and Miss Rebecca Carson emerged from the factory's back entrance, Mr. Conley stepped in front of them and enquired as to whether they intended to put him to work. He gave the ticket his approval and continued working.
Frank and Miss Rebecca Carson were approaching the elevator, but Conley was waiting there by the elevator, not sweeping. The African-American man wasn't sweeping while he was there by the elevator.

⁣Conley was in front of the elevator when he descended the stairs, and Mrs. Small testified that the elevator shakes the entire building, which are the two most crucial facts in this passage.

Mrs. Carson had previously sworn that she did not descend to see the blood but rather saw the locations where it was rumored to be. Mrs. Carson observed the alleged locations of the blood, as well as the alleged locations of the blood that appeared to be powder. The text ends by stating that Mrs. Carson had seen the alleged locations of the blood and that she had observed the locations as appearing like powder.

The case of Leo M. Frank, a defendant accused of perjury, is discussed in the text. Although she didn't object to going down, he claims that Mrs. Carson and he were sent there out of curiosity. The letters that were discovered in Frank's office and which clearly show that the author knew about the deal are also discussed in the text. The text concludes by stating that these letters are the will of an all-powerful providence and that they have irrevocably fixed the crime upon Frank. The text says that the letters have inherent signs of knowledge of the transaction in it before it ends. The most crucial information in this text is that Jim Conley, a Black man who killed and stole from a girl in a dark basement, took the time to jot down notes on a scrap of paper outside of Frank's office.


Being as inebriated as a fiddler's bitch prevented him from robbing the girl while being aware that Frank was present. The text also claims that committing a crime is a mistake in and of itself, and that both the criminal and the person trying to cover it up almost always make small errors. The text concludes by stating that crime is a mistake in and of itself, that the person committing the crime makes a mistake, and that the person trying to cover it up almost always makes a small mistake.

⁣The most significant information in this passage is that Scott's testimony was not questioned by the coroner and that Leo M.

Frank informed the girl that he was unsure as to whether the medal had arrived or not before she returned to check.

According to Jim Conley's statement, Frank mentioned wanting to talk to a girl four times before they broke up so that he could go outside and let Scott rest.

In neither the coroner's office nor when Scott appeared before the coroner was Scott's evidence questioned.

In order to expedite the hiring of a detective, he had the man switch the phone three times on Monday night.

According to Jim Conley's statement, Frank mentioned wanting to talk to a girl four times before they broke up so that he could go outside and let Scott rest.

Mr. Arnold's claim to the jury is that old Jim Conley, who had raped and killed a girl, took the time to conceal her body in the pencil factory's basement. The superintendent of the facility, Leo M. Frank, recognized the need for the girl's body not to be discovered on the second floor of the pencil factory and employed the language used in the letter or telegram he sent to Adolf Montague in New York in the cellar.


With all of their ingenuity, Starns and Campbell couldn't have known that old Jim would stand up here and claim that the man looked at him when he ran into the baby as if he had done it, and they couldn't have forced him to say I locked the door like he did told me.


The most crucial information in this passage is that a long, tall, black negro shoved another long, tall, black negro down a scuttle hole, and that the girl returned there to fetch water in the same direction that she would have gone to inquire about the metal. The long, tall, black man did it on his own, according to this note, and the girl went back there to fetch some water in the same direction that she would have gone to inquire about the metal.


The note also claims that the long, tall, black negro struck the girl with a large stick, which is undoubtedly a fabrication—just as Newt Lee's shirt was, for that matter. The most crucial information in this text is that a black man had the cunning to leave a girl's form somewhere other than where he struck her and knocked her to the ground, and that Leo M. Frank felt compelled to write there letters that he thought would clear him but that instead cast doubt on and damn him in the minds of every man seeking the truth. Furthermore, when there is a pad of notes from an elderly Jim Conley, there is nothing in circumstantial evidence that the jury must admit or that they do not dispute.


⁣The most significant information in this text is that Jim Conley, a factory superintendent, was instructed to remain silent and defend Leo M. Frank, the factory superintendent. Leo M. Frank, the factory superintendent, who wired Montague to tell his uncle, was protected by the letter, which was written in his name. Not in the factory, but in the cellar, was where the girl's body was discovered. The letter was written with the awareness and conscience that the poor girl's life had already been taken even as he was writing it. Conley's guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to the jury; however, this requirement does not apply to the doubts of a crank, a man who has created them to exonerate a friend, or a man who was a friend of a friend.

The most crucial information in this text is that circumstantial evidence is not less reliable than direct and positive evidence, and that it is appropriate to tell the jury that there is nothing about circumstantial evidence's nature that makes it less trustworthy than other types of evidence. The reliability of circumstantial evidence is demonstrated using two examples: the first compares incidental facts surrounding the main facts in issue to links in a chain, showing that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and the second compares incidental facts to the strands in a rope, showing that none of them may be sufficient on their own but that when combined, they may be powerful enough to prove guilt. The most significant information in this text is that each of these occurrences forms a chain, cord, strand, or cable, and that when combined, they form a cable that is as strong as can be woven around a human being. Unanalyzed, this man's statement to the jury was brilliant, and if the jury accepts it without questioning it, then of course they will not find him guilty.

A statement has no such inherent strength as the testimony of a witness, which even a jury cannot in all cases ignore. This statement has been skillfully crafted to address the case's requirements. The text concludes by saying that, in contrast to statements, testimony has inherent weight that even a jury cannot, in all cases, disregard.

👨👩👧👦 CREDIT LINK 👨👩👧👦
https://rumble.com/v2or5u0-the....-new-american-tv-get
➖
The New American
May 20, 2023
➖

🔎 LEARN, READ, WATCH MORE 🔍
■ https://society.truthparadigm.tv
■ https://society.truthparadigm.news


#Family #Parenting #Society #Education #School

⁣Money - Man’s biggest illusion

In this episode, Michael and Peter discuss the future of Bitcoin, money as economic energy, how Michael would build a new world, and the future of cyberspace.

Michael Saylor is an entrepreneur and business executive. He is the co-founder, former CEO, and executive chairman of MicroStrategy, a company that provides business intelligence, mobile software, and cloud-based services. MicroStrategy is the world's biggest publicly traded corporate owner of Bitcoin, with 129,218 BTC.

Learn more about Michael’s free education academy, Saylor Academy. https://www.saylor.org/

This episode is brought to you by Levels: real-time feedback on how diet impacts your health. https://levels.link/peter

Consider a journey to optimize your mind and body by visiting http://mylifeforce.com/peter

Timestamps
00:35 - 02:05 Intro
02:06 - 09:30 Money Is Economic Energy.
10:17 - 15:48 What Is The Future Of Bitcoin?
15:49 - 27:47 The Paradigm Shift That Was Bitcoin.
27:48 - 37:00 We've Got To Engineer A Better World.
37:01 - 39:22 Is There Still A Risk With Bitcoin?
39:23 - 51:14 Bitcoin Is The Energy That Will Shape The Future.
51:15 - 59:14 Politics Holds Back Innovation.
59:15 - 1:07:00 How Would Mike Saylor Build A New World?
1:07:01 - 1:08:31 The Next Move Isn't To Space, It's to Cyberspace.
1:09:17 - 1:13:39 Mike Saylor's Opinion On Modern Medicine.
1:13:40 - 1:14:46 There's A World Of Infinite Learning.
1:14:47 - 1:17:59 Trading & Education Is How We Should Improve The World.
1:18:00 - 1:21:22 The 10 Observations So You Can Make The World A Better Place.
1:21:23 - 1:29:14 Taking Back Control Of Your Money.
1:29:15 - 1:29:41 Outro


New to Peter?
Peter is on a mission to solve the world’s greatest problems. Named by Fortune as one of the “World’s 50 Greatest Leaders,” Peter Diamandis is a Father, Founder, Philanthropist, Humanitarian, and best-selling author. Peter has gathered over $100m to solve humanity's greatest problems. This show is Peter’s effort to share everything he knows about changing the world.

Connect with Peter:
Website: https://www.diamandis.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/peterdiamandis/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PeterDiamandis
LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/peterdiamandis/

Listen to Moonshots & Mindsets on:
https://www.diamandis.com/podcast
Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/....podcast/moonshots-an
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/....5Y1NyT6srGx38f5LINbH


Trailer composed and edited by @abramshaffer

⁣Simplify Your Life: 7 New Free AI Tools That Will Change Everything #aitools

⁣How to make money with AI

⁣7 Untapped AI Businesses To Start Right Now

⁣The_10_best_ways_to_profit_from_AI_right_now

🧠 CREDIT LINK 🧠

https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/41753
➖
July 2023
➖


🔎 LEARN, READ, WATCH MORE 🔍
■ https://realityalteration.truthparadigm.tv
■ https://realityalteration.truthparadigm.news


#RealityAlteration #MindControl #Gradualism #MKUltra #Truth