⁣Indonesia picks Turkey's Kaan for its fighter jet fleet.

Jakarta will buy 48 of the jets worth a total of $10 BILLION, making it Turkey’s biggest arms export ever.

The 10-year agreement includes co-production of 5th-gen jet components in Indonesia.

Source: https://t.me/rtnews/98671

ONLY VERY OLD PEOPLE REMEMBER NANCY. THERE ARE NOT MANY NANCY's CARTOONS. SHE WAS A CHARACTER OF THE NEWSPAPERS COMIC STRIPS OF THE 1940s AND EARLY 1950s.

⁣Does Israel have a death wish for us all as it attacks Iran ?

OLD BLACK AND WHITE CARTOON FROM 1930.

OUR DAILY OLDIES

CLASSIC CARTOONS

CLASSIC CARTOONS

⁣A French travel blogger documents the destruction and atmosphere in war-time Tel Aviv

'We’re all shocked', she writes

Is this shocking?

Footage source: justine_in_israel

Source: https://t.me/rtnews/99625

CLASSIC CARTOONS

CLASSIC CARTOONS

CLASSIC CARTOONS

⁣Trump Calls Out Fake News Spin on Iran Strikes — Says the Last Thing Iran’s Thinking About is Restarting Nukes

President Trump set the record straight on the mission’s success and slammed the media’s downplaying.

“Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. They've wanted this for years, and they were weeks away from getting it.”

He described the strike in detail:

“Those pilots went in there with those beautiful planes and the most sophisticated bombs anywhere in the world.”

“Think of it. They can go 30 stories deep into granite. Who would think that's even possible? And they did obliterate it, it turned out.”

Then he took aim at the vicious fake media narrative circling around the strikes.

“Then we had the fake news, where the fake news and CNN and the New York Times were saying, well, maybe it wasn't as good as Trump said. Maybe it wasn't totally obliterated. It was destroyed but not—you know, just horrible.”

“I could see it happening, and they tried to build that into a story, and then it turned out, no, it was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before.”

And the bottom line for Iran’s nuclear program?

“That meant the end to their nuclear ambitions at least for a period of time.”

“A lot of people have said, well, do you think they're going to start again?”

“I said, the last thing they want to do right now is think about nuclear. They have to put themselves back into condition and shape.”

Source: https://t.me/VigilantFox/16422

CLASSIC CARTOONS

SOME PEOPLE TALK MORE THAN OTHERS BUT ALWAYS LEAVE US WITH MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS.

CLASSIC CARTOONS

⁣Epstein Blackmailing for Israel — Tucker

Israel 'committing crimes on US soil' & ex-PM Barak 'living in Epstein's HOUSE'

Crowd erupts

Source: https://t.me/rtnews/102613

OUR DAILY OLDIES

LONG TIME AGO, IN A REUNION WITH OTHER PIANO PLAYERS IN NEW ORLEANS FRENCH QUARTER, I HEARD FATS DOMINO SAYING THESE WORDS: "THAT MUSIC YOU NOW CALL ROCK AND ROLL, I'VE BEEN PLAYING IT IN NEW ORLEANS SINCE 1949". THIS IS A FATS DOMINO OLD RECORDING FROM 1950.

⁣ANR EVENT AWAR 19-20 JULY, DAY2, 6-JOHN WILSON

⁣The Future will be Digital — The Question Is: Who Owns the System?

Trump is launching a new digital health system, where Americans can upload their personal medical data into apps run by Big Tech — Amazon, Google, Apple, Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic.

Do we like the sound of it? Not really…

We understand that paper records are obsolete in a world of instant global communication and AI diagnostics. But the real issue isn’t “tech vs no tech”. It’s:
- Centralized vs decentralized-
Opaque vs transparent-
Enslaving vs sovereign-

Outsourcing health data to tech firms, especially those deeply embedded with the Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA, and the biomedical-military complex, does not inspire confidence, to say the least. And if the architecture is centralized, then it’s harvestable, hackable, and abusable.

What would a better system look like?
A decentralized, blockchain-based health data system — one that respects your privacy, honors your consent, and keeps control where it belongs: with you.

Here’s what that could mean:
• Patient-owned data: Your medical record lives on a decentralized ledger. Only you hold the private keys. Not your doctor. Not the government. Not Google.
• Zero-knowledge access: Health professionals or AI services could request access only with your explicit, time-limited, cryptographic consent. You see full logs of who accessed what, when, and why.
• Interoperable but sovereign: You can move across borders, systems, or providers and still carry your record — not on a USB stick, but as a secure, encrypted digital asset tied to your identity.
• No centralized control: No company or government can unilaterally revoke, modify, or monetize your data.

This isn’t science fiction. It’s already technologically possible, using tools like:
• IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) — for distributed storage
• ZKPs (Zero-knowledge proofs) — for private computation
• DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) — for public governance
• SSI (Self-sovereign identity) frameworks — for user-owned ID

But none of the companies involved in Trump’s CMS rollout are using any of this. They’re sticking to centralized databases wrapped in AI, which means control and profit stay with them, not with you.

What we must demand:
1. Decentralized infrastructure — no more blind trust in “opt-in” programs run by megacorps.
2. Open-source alternatives — medical tech does not need to be proprietary to be secure or innovative.
3. Legal recognition of data sovereignty — your personal data must be treated like personal property, with real penalties for unauthorized use.
4. Education in digital self-defense — cryptographic literacy must become the new public health.

The problem isn’t that Trump is rolling out a digital health system.
It’s how it’s being built, who controls it and what architecture it runs on.

Trump may believe he’s cutting red tape, streamlining health, and using the private sector to improve lives. But unless we the people demand transparency, decentralization, and true data ownership, we’re walking straight into a gilded digital cage.

Source: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/74041