‘The idea of renewable energy being some kind of low intensity green economy is a complete fallacy’.

Online editor for the Spectator Australia Alexandra Marshall joins Fred Pawle.

Stream 'Alan Jones' 8pm Monday to Thursday on ADH TV: https://watch.adh.tv/browse
____________________

📖 Read more from ADH TV here: https://adh.tv/

💬 Join in the conversation in the comments.

👍 Like this video if you enjoyed it and want to see more, it really helps us out

🔔 Subscribe to our channel and click the bell to watch our videos first

⏲️ Missed this episode live? Subscribe to ADH TV to be up to date with all our events:
https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup

🎤 Have your say and contact Alan Jones on alanjones@adh.tv

____________________

Australia's Leading Voice. News and analysis from experienced broadcasters with insightful interviews. Join the debate on the future direction of the country.

Check out ADH TV at - https://adh.tv
Subscribe to the ADH TV mailing list- https://adh.tv/subscribe/
Join ADH TV as a member for free at - https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup


Follow ADH TV on Socials
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adhtvaus Facebook: http://facebook.com/adhtvaus Instagram: http://instagram.com/adh_tv Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/....44ISFXCYFB6zbvOTAjok

‘The fact that there is legislation not yet in law has now inspired the woke corporates to join the climate alarmists.’

Alan Jones slams Westpac’s new emissions targets.

Watch ‘Alan Jones’ 8pm Monday to Thursday on ADH TV: https://watch.adh.tv/
____________________

📖 Read more from ADH TV here: https://adh.tv/

💬 Join in the conversation in the comments.

👍 Like this video if you enjoyed it and want to see more, it really helps us out

🔔 Subscribe to our channel and click the bell to watch our videos first

⏲️ Missed this episode live? Subscribe to ADH TV to be up to date with all our events:
https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup

🎤 Have your say and contact Alan Jones on alanjones@adh.tv

____________________

Australia's Leading Voice. News and analysis from experienced broadcasters with insightful interviews. Join the debate on the future direction of the country.

Check out ADH TV at - https://adh.tv
Subscribe to the ADH TV mailing list- https://adh.tv/subscribe/
Join ADH TV as a member for free at - https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup


Follow ADH TV on Socials
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adhtvaus Facebook: http://facebook.com/adhtvaus Instagram: http://instagram.com/adh_tv Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/....44ISFXCYFB6zbvOTAjok

‘What I think is really interesting and somewhat troubling about this is that culture isn’t something that gets imposed upon a nation from above.’

Distinguished Fellow of the Menzies Research Centre Amanda Stoker joins Fred Pawle.

Watch ‘Fred Pawle’ 9pm Monday on ADH TV: https://watch.adh.tv/
____________________

📖 Read more from ADH TV here: https://adh.tv/

💬 Join in the conversation in the comments.

👍 Like this video if you enjoyed it and want to see more, it really helps us out

🔔 Subscribe to our channel and click the bell to watch our videos first

⏲️ Missed this episode live? Subscribe to ADH TV to be up to date with all our events:
https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup

🎤 Have your say and contact Alan Jones on alanjones@adh.tv

____________________

Australia's Leading Voice. News and analysis from experienced broadcasters with insightful interviews. Join the debate on the future direction of the country.

Check out ADH TV at - https://adh.tv
Subscribe to the ADH TV mailing list- https://adh.tv/subscribe/
Join ADH TV as a member for free at - https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup


Follow ADH TV on Socials
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adhtvaus Facebook: http://facebook.com/adhtvaus Instagram: http://instagram.com/adh_tv Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/....44ISFXCYFB6zbvOTAjok

‘Unless you have nations willing to stand up, to be strong, to be forthright about their own interests and to be unwilling to kowtow to demands from Chinese leadership, we will continue to find this kind of escalating behaviour.’

Distinguished Fellow of the Menzies Research Centre Amanda Stoker joins Fred Pawle.

Watch ‘Fred Pawle’ 9pm Monday on ADH TV: https://watch.adh.tv/
____________________

📖 Read more from ADH TV here: https://adh.tv/

💬 Join in the conversation in the comments.

👍 Like this video if you enjoyed it and want to see more, it really helps us out

🔔 Subscribe to our channel and click the bell to watch our videos first

⏲️ Missed this episode live? Subscribe to ADH TV to be up to date with all our events:
https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup

🎤 Have your say and contact Alan Jones on alanjones@adh.tv

____________________

Australia's Leading Voice. News and analysis from experienced broadcasters with insightful interviews. Join the debate on the future direction of the country.

Check out ADH TV at - https://adh.tv
Subscribe to the ADH TV mailing list- https://adh.tv/subscribe/
Join ADH TV as a member for free at - https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup


Follow ADH TV on Socials
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adhtvaus Facebook: http://facebook.com/adhtvaus Instagram: http://instagram.com/adh_tv Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/....44ISFXCYFB6zbvOTAjok

⁣http://www.wealthcreationacademy.com - 21st Century Educator, Jamie McIntyre. Learn The Secrets of the Rich and learn how to Create Wealth and Achieve Financial Freedom. Young Australian Reveals His Wealth Creation Secrets on Millionaire Mindset and How He Went from Broke to Self Made Millionaire in his Twenties. And Now He's Going to Give You the Same Secrets for FREE!

⁣http://www.21stcenturyacademy.com/ - 21st Century Education

⁣MUST SEE Australian Global Bitcoin Conference Melbourne March 28-29 - 2014 (By Jamie McIntyre)

Herein we discuss Counter Reformation primarily from the perspective of the Protestant Reformation. However, we also talk about the concept of reformation and counter reformation from the Old Testament. John provides an excellent overview of the Protestant Reformation from the 14th century to the present.

⁣Business Oppurtunity - TruthTalk - Titled

⁣ Jamie McIntyre And The 21st Century Academy
http://CompleteWealthEducation.com Jamie McIntyre discusses some simple yet very effective Stock Market Strategies like Renting Shares at The 21st Century Academy. Please visit The link to get your FREE 3hr Wealth Creation DVD and 300 page E-Book right now.

⁣
https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel

-------

Proverbs 12:17: He who speaks truth declares righteousness,
But a false witness, deceit.

-------

📺 CHANNEL(S) 📺
■ https://firstamendment.truthparadigm.tv
■ https://secondamendment.truthparadigm.tv

-------

💎TREASURE💎
■ https://cspoa.org
■ https://www.j6truth.org/
■ https://thepatriotlight.com/
■ https://www.devolution.link
■ https://covid19criticalcare.com
■ https://reawakeningseries.com
■ https://ministry.truthparadigm.tv
■ https://ministry.truthparadigm.news
■ http://truthparadigm.net

-------

⬇ CREDIT(S) ⬇
■ https://sources.truthparadigm.net

-----------------
#1A, #2A, #secondamendment, #Truth, #GunRights, #a, #guns, #glock, #pewpew, #ndamendment, #ar, #freedom, #gunsofinstagram, #gun, #america, #edc, #firearms, #gunsdaily, #concealedcarry, #maga, #pewpewlife, #usa, #nra, #donttreadonme, #molonlabe, #conservative, #mm, #merica, #pistol, #everydaycarry, #kag, #republican, #liberty, #pewpewpew, #rifle, #weaponsdaily, #igmilitia, #gunrights, #tactical, #shooting, #constitution, #keepamericagreat, #politics, #ccw, #military, #backtheblue, #shallnotbeinfringed, #guncontrol, #weapons, #selfdefense, #x, #gunlife, #handgun, #progun, #gunstagram, #makeamericagreatagain, #bluelivesmatter, #righttobeararms, #libertarian,, #BearingArms

⁣Shaadinama by Talla Jewellers is India’s first Personalised Bridal Jewellery Buying Guide created to help modern brides choose jewellery with confidence. From bridal necklace sets and kundan chokers to diamond and temple jewelry, Shaadinama offers expert styling tailored to your outfit, skin tone, wedding functions, and personal style.

Brides receive personalised recommendations, gemstone guidance, colour harmony tips, and budget planning support through free 1:1 celebrity stylist consultations.

Whether you’re planning a traditional or modern wedding, Shaadinama helps you build timeless bridal looks that feel elegant, coordinated, and investment-worthy because random catalog shopping is not a strategy.

⁣https://shaadinama.tallajewellers.com/

⁣Do THIS to Make $10,000 as a Student

CLASSIC CARTOONS

⁣In Atlanta and the South, the well-known Leo M. Frank case is arguably the best crime thriller of all time. Young Mary Phagan was brutally murdered when she went to the National Pencil Factory to pick up her paycheck, according to the story. Alas, is understandably intriguing to any working man or woman, as terrifying as its details are. All who hear about a crime mystery find it intriguing. But because this particular case involves the prosecution of an elite Jew, Mary Phagan's crime thriller lost its identity with Leo M. Frank. The Frank case involved Frank, the manager of a sizable factory where a affable little employee had died. No other murder investigation in the South has sparked as much curiosity. There is more to this story than just a respectable man assigned to kill a lust-driven young factory girl. It is more than just a crime thriller.

He claims to be the victim of persecution because he is Jewish, which makes this case crucial. The story of a horrifying crime, significant events that occurred over the following four months, and, finally, the tale of a great trial in which two of the South's top criminal defense lawyers squared off against the astute minds of the Atlanta Attorney General for a month. was finished. However, a lot of the intriguing tales pertaining to the Frank case were never published because the media was afraid to mention them in their articles.

Frank was found guilty by the Fulton Supreme Court, which brings the play to a close. The case was not resolved following the Atlanta County trial. This is because the juvenile defendant will be brought back before a judge soon after receiving a death sentence, and if he is to be hanged, it could take months or even years for that to happen. remain. The battle for Frank's life, however, changed into a complex legal dispute starting on the day of the verdict. The real story concludes with a trial and the author's explanation of all the significant details.

⁣The coroner's inquest began Wednesday morning after lengthy interviews with Frank and Newt Lee at the police station Tuesday night. A large number of witnesses, including factory girls and many others, arrived at the police station to testify at the inquest. The first to testify were Constables W.F. Anderson and Brown, who detailed how they were informed of the murder and how they found the body on that harrowing Saturday night. Mr. Anderson said the basement was a long narrow enclosure between rock walls, with an elevator shaft near the front, a boiler in the middle on the right, and a partition enclosed in a junk-room-like enclosure on the left that opened. I explained that there was a restroom. The right side is behind the cauldron, the left side is behind the girl's body and behind the door. Brown followed Anderson to the witness stand and made a very damaging testimony against Newt Lee. He said it was impossible to tell that the body belonged to a white girl unless you were within a few feet of it.

Brown testified that Mary Phagan's body was found in a pile on her chair, along with her clothes, a purple dress with white trimmings, shoes, and gunmetal-black slippers around 11 o'clock. At 4:45 a.m. Newt Lee took the stand and testified that he had arrived at the factory at 4:00 a.m. He then left as Frank told him to. Detectives and police say it was face down, but he testified that he found it face up. J.Q. Spear of Cartersville saw a girl and a man outside a pencil factory on Saturday afternoon, they were excited and nervous, and the girl was seen at P.'s on Sunday. Newt Lee testified that it was the same as Chapel of J. Bloomfield. George Epps, a young newsboy who had driven into town with Mary Phagan, testified that Mary told her that Mr. Frank gave her a look and that he was suspicious. E.L. Sentell testified that he saw Mullinax with a girl he believed to be Mary Phagan late Saturday night. R. P. Barrett testified that he found bloodstains near Mary's machine on the second floor. Gant took the stand and told the same story he had already told the detectives. J.W. Coleman testified about the horror she and her mother felt on the night of the murder by Leo M. Frank. Fourth National Bank assistant teller Barry said the note found on the girl's body was written in the same hand-writing as several other notes written by black nightguard Newt Lee, detectives at police headquarters. said.

The inquest was postponed until Thursday as investigators took steps toward solving the mystery of the death of infant Mary Phagan. They concluded that Mary had only briefly gone to the factory on Saturday afternoons to collect her wages, and that she had never left the factory. Claims that Mary was seen in the middle of the night with Malenax and girls matching her description were scrutinized but found to be unfounded. Elle Center confirmed that she saw Pearl Robinson, not Mary Phagan with Mullinax. Other witnesses who are said to have seen the girl on Saturday afternoon also came forward and said they may have been wrong.

Officials have come to the plausible speculation that Mary Phagan never made it out of the pencil factory alive. Gant and Molinax were released from custody on Thursday afternoon, and the inquest was temporarily postponed. ⁣⁣The Donahue coroner said an autopsy into the girl's death was postponed until Monday. The two suspects are: Newt Lee and Leo Frank were transferred to Fulton County Tower pending an investigation at Police Headquarters. The coroner's warrant that brought them to the Tower was identical in both cases, except for the name that Frank read to the Fulton County, Georgia jailer. After the two men in the tower and two other former suspects were released Thursday, there seemed little doubt that investigators held the key to the mystery. But James Jim Conley, a black cleaner at a pencil factory, was arrested at 2 a.m. At 12:00 p.m. Thursday, he was detained at the Police Headquarters factory along with elevator boy Snowball. Conley's arrest was not well publicized at the time, and the newspapers wrote only one paragraph about it. The sixth arrest in the Phagan murders was made by investigators at 1:00 am.

At midnight Thursday, James Conley, a black janitor employed at the National Pencil Factory, was seen washing his shirts at the faucet behind the building. He claimed that the stains on his shirt were rust stains and that he had washed the shirt to appear in court to attend the interrogation he was summoned for. His testimony is believed by the police, and theories and clues are pouring into the detective agency. Many of Frank's friends personally worked on the case to clear the cloud of suspicion hanging over the prominent young superintendent. Theories flood the detective agency as to how Mary Phagan came to her death and what system might be used to bring her murderers to justice. People have been calling authorities to tell them how to proceed, and the agency has received hundreds of letters of advice and theories from the state and six other states. The most important detail in this text is that the two women had a murder dream and the murderer is detailed. Frank's friends flocked to his defense as both Frank and blacks denounced him. Thursday night, Joseph M. Brown advised Lieutenant General J. Van Holt Nash to keep in touch with the 5th Regiment's Georgia National Guard so that the unit could act in the event of an emergency.

This has prompted city, county and even state officials to pay close attention. Governor Brown also advised Lieutenant General J. Van Holt Nash to keep in touch with the Georgia National Guard at the 5th Georgia Regiment to keep the unit ready for action in the event of an emergency. The governor warned prison officials and police to be on alert for signs of civil unrest. Colonel E.E. Pomeroy, commander of the 5th Regiment, gathered his men in the Auditorium Armory, a few blocks from the tower where Frank and Lee were inside the prison, and held them there until late at night 11 o'clock. At 3:30 pm the soldiers were allowed to return to their homes.

⁣Rumors of mob violence were proven unfounded until the coroner's jury met again Thursday through Monday morning, and on Saturday night the militia were again ordered to stand by in case of trouble. A meeting between Chief Detective Rumford and Coroner Paul Donoghue summoned additional witnesses to the investigation, resulting in a united effort by city and state forces to tackle the case. Rumors circulated in the city throughout Saturday that one of the two prisoners in the tower had made a confession, which authorities angrily denied, but later proved to be completely unfounded.

⁣The first week after the discovery of Mary Phagan's body ended with elite county, city, state, and outside agencies working on the case, with two suspects inside the tower, and the state as a whole. I was looking forward to responding to the coroner's investigation.

⁣Attorney Hugh Dorsey's closing argument in Leo Frank's trial for the murder of Mary Phagan is a compelling outline of the case and a compelling argument that played a major role in the jury's conviction of Frank. This case is unusual for a crime, it is the most heinous crime, it is a crime committed by evil spirits, it requires vigorous, serious and conscientious efforts of detectives, and a sincere, serious and conscientious consideration of the case. is a crime that requires member of the jury. The prosecution had two of the country's most capable attorneys, Attorney Rosser and Attorney Arnold, who abused the defendants and the Criminal Investigation Unit. Also, they slandered the defendant so much that the defendant's mother was forced to stand up in front of her and denounce him like a dog. The most important detail of this document is that the investigators and authors of this case were not subject to prejudice, and that they dared come to this present day because they were non-Jews. It means that he would not have asked for guilt. Jews were black. But the detectives and the author, when they did not present their case in this way, and dared to embark on such a situation because they were Gentiles, Jews, or Negroes, did not find a man guilty of guilt. I was disappointed that I would not have asked for a sentence. The author believes that this man's native race is as good as we are, and that in a time when our ancestors roamed the forests freely and ate cannibals, his ancestors were civilized, lived in cities, and had laws. claim to have followed It honors the race that produced Disraeli, Judah P. Benjamin, the Strauss brothers, Abe Hummel, Roof and Schwartz, and dozens of others who murdered a girl in New York. The main detail of this document is that this great race is governed by the same laws as the rest of the white and black races, rising to the heights and sinking to the lowest depths of depravity. be. Copywriters, lawyers, and judges go round and round to define reasonable doubt judgments that are as obvious as the nose on the face.

One lyricist has said that those who try to define it tautologically reuse the same word, but this is not a fantastic proposition. It's just a matter of common sense, an everyday, practical matter. The most important detail of this text is the definition of reasonable suspicion and unjustified suspicion. A reasonable suspicion is a suspicion that can be given reasons and is based on reasons. It must be very questionable whether man can control and decide his actions in the most important matters of life. It should not be a vague putative suspicion or mere conjecture that the accused may be innocent. It should not be an imaginary suspicion, a petty speculation, or a mere possibility of innocence. Don't be weird or overly sensitive.

⁣An important detail of this audio document is that circumstantial evidence is more reliable than direct evidence, and that a large number of witnesses who provide circumstantial evidence and a case suggestive of guilt is more likely to be the testimony of a small number of witnesses who may have committed a crime. It can be proved with more certainty than So did eyewitnesses to the actual act. States are hampered in many ways by this reasonable suspicion, and often have to do more than prove the guilt of men before they are convicted. Some say circumstantial evidence alone does not convict, but Bosch officials have shown that circumstantial evidence is the best evidence. A jury should not hesitate in the absence of hard evidence, and will only convict if the evidence is consistent with all the facts of the case. Good characters are important because they say a lot. An important detail of the document is that the defendants in this case questioned their character and the state responded with acceptance of the challenge. It is believed that the defendant was just as good a person as he was when he lived in Atlanta, but getting people to criticize someone else's character is the hardest thing for a lawyer. Note also that if the defendant's guilt is clearly established to the satisfaction of the jury, a demonstration of good character does not bar conviction. He also points out that the most difficult burden of proof is to destroy the personality of a person who is truly personable. Finally, it is noted that the accused referred to 19 or 20 fine, highly trained, working schoolgirls as scum fanatics and liars, a term they frequently spread here. . An important detail of this sentence is that, as in the Durant case, the defendant is of good character, but his guilt is clearly proven to the satisfaction of the jury. The defendant makes perjury some time later and asks the jury to convict Jim Conley if the evidence requires him to snap Jim Conley's neck. Mr. Arnold said yesterday that Mr. Jim Conley has not been charged with this offense and that unless there is evidence other than that presented here or previously presented, the jury will seek another He said an attorney general should be elected. An important detail of this document is that if a person's personality is questioned and the state cannot do so, it is the defendant's responsibility. Direct questioning must relate to general reputation, whether good or bad, and cross-examination may involve specific transactions or statements made by the individual under investigation. Defendant suspended a witness and introduced him to a jury, putting his character in such a situation. This showed that the defendant needs a conscience, and that Leo M. Frank would not have been so relieved if he had contributed to putting the noose around Jim Conley's neck for the crimes he committed.

⁣The most important detail in the document is that witnesses were called to refute the case, but they dared not cross-examine them. Statement of the Good People Associated with the Hebrew Orphanage, Dr. Marks and Dr. Sun showed that they knew the Leo M. Frank character as well as they did. The speaker also suggested that if someone is accused of a crime and their character is questioned, they may be able to force others to do what they want. The speaker believes the proposal is an insidious one and the problem with the deal is that there are too many gimmicks and not enough honest and clear business. The speaker believes the problem with this business is that there are too many gimmicks and not enough honest and outspoken business.

The most important detail of the document is that three talented lawyers and an innocent man who worked in a factory and over twenty girls were in court, the man was character in terms of lust and uncontrollable passion. It is a testimony that it is bad. I had poor Mary Phagan killed. The book states that it is permissible to cross-examine a witness to find out who told them these things, and that the issue is of intrinsic importance and contradicts a person's innocence. I'm here. The main detail in this document is that the well had a leak and little Miss Jackson let it out. A man, the factory manager, who wants to ban flirting, spied on the schoolgirls and told them to go to the girls' locker room. Old Jim Conley claims that someone who worked upstairs went up there, but Mr. Ruben B. Arnold said that was a lie and called them gruesome fanatics.

Evidence suggests the man was staying in a room on the fourth floor with a working woman. Now he works there and who still has the courage to come here and talk? The most important detail in this document is that the defendant went to the pencil factory and met with the woman on the fourth floor. Their witness, Miss Jackson, said she heard him enter there three or four times more often than she had ever seen, and they complained to the four women. On August 23, the judge ruled that defendant was not of good character and that the attorney's conduct in the case contradicted defendant's claim that he was of good character. The judge also said the defendant had the right to ask the girls where they got their information from and why they didn't do it when the defendant was a bad guy.

⁣The most important details in this text are that the testimony of the good people living out on Washington Street connected with the Hebrew Orphans Home, Dr. Marks, Dr. Sun, and all the other people running with Dr. Jekyll don't know the character of Mr. Hyde, and that Dr. Marks didn't call Dr. Sun down to the factory on Saturday evenings to show what he was going to do with those girls. The text also mentions that the trouble about this business is that there is too much shenanigans and too little honest, plain dealings. Finally, the text mentions that Dr. Marks, Dr. Sun, and all the other people running with Dr. Jekyll don't know the character of Mr. Hyde, and that they didn't call Dr. Marks down to the factory on Saturday evenings to show what he was going to do with those girls. The most important details in this text are that three able counsel and an innocent man and 20 or more girls, all of whom had worked in the factory but none of whom work there at this time, tell the court that the man had a bad character for Lasciviousness, the uncontrolled and uncontrollable passion that led him on to kill poor Mary Phagan. This book says it is allowable to cross examine a witness to see and find out what he knows, who told him those things. Three capable lawyers, an innocent man and over 20 girls, all worked in that factory, but none of them worked in the factory at the time, but in court, the man was amorous. He testified that he had an uncontrollable and uncontrollable passion. He made him kill poor Mary Phagan. Old Jim Conley may not have been so wrong when he thought someone was working his fourth floor. The most important details in this document are the testimony of those who believe the man was in the fourth floor room with the woman, and the testimony of the woman who now works there. Her witness, Miss Jackson, said she complained to the four women after hearing they were in there three to four times more often than she had seen him. Perhaps it was right there on Saturday night when he visited the woman on the fourth floor that old Jim Conley was said to have met. Mr. Dorsey had just finished saying what he wanted to say about the person question yesterday. An important detail in the document is that the defendant has not been shown to be a person of good character, and that the conduct of the attorneys in this case in failing to cross-examine twenty young women indicates that the defendant was of good character. It denies the defendant's allegation that he was a person of character. Moreover, one agency said that whenever someone has evidence but does not provide it, the presumption is strongest that having it is harmful. Because common sense dictates that whenever a person is able to give evidence and knows if they have it, the strongest suspicion arises against that person.

⁣The most important details in this text are that the able counsel didn't ask the hairbrained fanatics before they had ever gone on the stand, and that the poor, unprotected working girls from Washington Street had no interest in the case and were not under the influence of the pencil company or Montague. The speaker believes that the poor, unprotected working girls have no interest in the case and are not under the influence of the pencil company or Montague, and that they know that the man is of bad character. He has a reputation for good conduct only among those people that don't know his character. The most important details in this text are that David of Old was a great character until he put old Uriah in the forefront of battle, Judas Ascariat was a good character until he took the 30 pieces of silver and betrayed our Lord Jesus Christ, Benedict Arnold was brave and enjoyed the confidence of all the people and those in charge of the management of the Revolutionary War, until he betrayed his country, and Oscar Wilde was an Irish knight, a literary man, brilliant, the author of works that will go down the ages, Lady Windermere's Fan d profundis, which he wrote well confined in jail. He had the affrontery, boldness, and coolness of a pervert, and when the Marquis of Queensbury saw that there was something wrong between him and his son, he sued the Marquis for damages which brought retaliation on the part of the Marquis for criminal practices on the part of Wilde. The test will continue to be the subject of research by lawyers and people interested in perverts like this guy. An important detail in this document is that Mr. Abe Roof of San Francisco, of the same race and religion, respected and respected the city's leaders, but he was skeptical of Schmidt and all that fell into his hands. It means that they have fallen. Durant was a man with such a reputation that people appointed him head of the community, but despite that reputation he did not have a steadfast character, and when he got fed up with his wife, she shot her in the bathtub. All these men, formerly of good character, were convicted as self-confessed perverts and died of old age. The most important detail of this text is the case of Richardson of Boston and Beatty of Richmond. Richardson was a pastor trusted by his congregation, but he murdered a poor girl due to an affair. After his sentencing, he hoped and granted the governor to save his life. Beatty was a wealthy man who shot and killed his wife, the mother of his 12-month-old baby, in a car. He was cool and composed, but joked too much, detectives were reprimanded and slandered, and black money was used in defense to save him from the gallows. Both cases demonstrate the importance of doing one's duty and the bravery of jurors and the Governor of Massachusetts.

⁣The most important details in this text are that an alibi is a defense that involves the impossibility of the prisoner's presence at the scene of the offense at the time of its commission. This defense involves the impossibility of the prisoner's presence at the scene of the offense at the time of its commission, and the range of evidence must be such as to exclude the possibility of guilt and the burden of carrying. An alibi is worse than no defense at all, as it involves the impossibility of proving that the prisoner was at the prayer meeting where he wasn't to show that he wasn't at the crap game where he was. This man never made an admission from the beginning until the end of this case except he knew that someone could fasten it on him wherever he knew that people knew he was in the factory. The most important details in this text are that the witness, the daughter of a man who works for Montague, swore that she saw the murderer at Alabama and abroad at 110, but the paper containing her admission made in the presence of her attorney Monday morning, April 28, states that she didn't leave the factory until 1:10.

The witness also claims that she had never seen the murderer at Alabama and abroad at 1:10, and that she had never seen him at Jacob's at Jacob's. The witness also claims that she saw the murderer at Jacob's at 110, but the paper containing her admission made in the presence of her attorney Monday morning, April 28, states that she had never seen him at Alabama and abroad at 1:10. The witness also claims that she saw the murderer at Jacob's at 1:10, but the paper containing her admission made in the presence of her attorney Monday morning, April 28, states that she had never seen him at Alabama and abroad at 1:10. Finally, the witness claims that she saw the murderer at Jacob's at 1:10, but the paper containing her admission made in the presence of her attorney Monday morning, April 28, states that she had never seen The most important details in this text are the speech of a lawyer to whom Arnold and Rosser would have pulled off their hats in admiration for his intellect and character. Daniel Webster's great speech in the Nap case states that time is identical and its subdivisions are all alike, and that no man knows one day from another or 1 hour from another, but by some fact connected with it. As Old Shinyontog warned, the evidence has been twisted and altered to support this man's alibi claim. For example, here we find out that Frank has arrived at the factory. The most important detail in this document is that Frank arrived in Montagu at 8:30 am.
At thirty he borrowed a raincoat from his brother-in-law, Frau Ulsenbach. Maddy Smith left the building at 9 a.m.

Frank calls Schiff to come to his office at 10:00am. At 11 o'clock, Frank returns to the pencil factory, where he dictates mail and signs letters. Frank states in his statement that he will arrive at Montagu every hour, every minute, at this hour.




⁣The most important details in this text are that Mary Phagan arrived 10 or 15 minutes after Miss Hall left the factory, and that Lemme Quinn arrived not on the minute, but to serve their purposes from 1220 to 1222. This contradicts the evidence of Freeman and the other young lady who placed Quinn in the factory before that time, which was after they had eaten lunch and about to pay their fare before they ever saw Quinn at the little cafe, the Busy Bee. Mr. Arnold believes that if a crowd of people laugh every time they say anything, how are they to hear the court? He is going to interrupt him on every substantial one he makes. Mr. Dorsey is accused of perjury in a case involving a woman who was killed by a man she saw before twelve and before he left at 01:00.

Mr. Arnold suggests that the woman runs under the bank, but she takes the bait and runs under the bank. Mr. Dorsey then comes back at her again to show how she turned a turtle. He then accuses the people of Georgia and Fulton County and of Atlanta of suffering an innocent girl`s death at the hands of a man like this and then turning him loose on such evidence as this. Mr. Dorsey then compares the circumstances of the case to those of New to Lee and Gantt, and concludes that they had only weak and flimsy circumstances against them. He then asks why they didn't take New to Lee and Gantt, as they had only weak and flimsy circumstances against them.

The most important details in this audiobook are that circumstantial evidence is just as good as any other kind when it is the right kind, and that Newt Lee has a strong case of circumstantial evidence against him. This evidence is in black and white, committed in the presence of the jury after he had already said that he wrote the financial sheet Saturday morning and at his suggestion, he turned around and swore to the contrary. Schiff claims that he went home and slept all day and didn't get up what he called the dutta. He may have the nerve of an Oscar Wild, but if it did, it wouldn't prove anything. He may have been cool when nobody was there to accuse him.

Frank was a college graduate, head of the B'nai B'rith, and the head of the B'nai B'rith. He spent his Saturday afternoons using the data Schiff provided him when he could do it in the morning. Miss Fleming told the truth that she didn't stay there very often on Saturday afternoon. Frank could have fixed up that financial sheet Saturday morning without Schiff having furnished the data if he hadn't been suspecting an accusation of murdering that little girl. A man of Frank's type could easily have fixed that financial sheet a thing he did 52 times a year for five or six years and could have betrayed no nervousness. He may have written so as not to portray his nervousness.

⁣Leo Max Frank, the superintendent of the National Pencil Company, was accused of killing Mary Phagan, a 13-year-old laborer, by the prosecution. Many would contend that the renowned promoter and lawyer in the city, Thomas B. Felder. The defense team was strong, led by Ruben Arnold and Luther Rosser. Felder was secretly working for Frank and his associates as well. Few people anticipated that the defendant, Leo Frank, would soon take the stand and make an admission that was so unbelievable that it was difficult to believe as the defense began its parade of witnesses. Everyone in the audience, including the jury, was still thinking about Jim Conley's prosecution testimony.

Conley acknowledged assisting Frank in moving Mary Phagan's lifeless body from the metal room bathroom on the second floor of the pencil factory to a location in the basement, adding that Frank had asked him to return later and burn the body in exchange for a $200 payment that had been promised. Additionally, he described to a packed courtroom how he had created the "death notes" in the black dialect. The most significant information in this text is that W-W-W. Conley claimed that, at Frank's direction, Frank had acknowledged accidentally killing the girl by hitting her when she rejected his advances. Mary Phagan must have arrived after Montane Stower, not before her, according to Matthews, a motorman for the Georgia Railway and Electric Company who testified that she got off his car at 1210 and was sworn in on behalf of the defense.

To confirm timing, W.T. Hollis, a streetcar conductor, was called W-W-W Matthews. According to Matthews, Mary Phagan boarded his vehicle at Lindsay Street at 11:50 a.m., and their route from Bellwood to English Avenue was followed by Kennedy, Kennedy, and then Gray. To Gray and Jones Avenue and from Jones Avenue to Marietta, Broad Street to Marietta, then out. W-W-W. Matthews was supposed to show up at Marietta and Broad at twelve seven and a half, but they showed up on time and remained on schedule the entire day. Mary Phagan exited at Broad and Marietta; it takes two to three minutes to travel from Broad and Marietta to Broad and Hunter on this busy street. Another motorman took over as the driver at Broad and Marietta, but he remained in the same vehicle and sat down one seat behind Mary Phagan. Around 1210, they arrived at Broad and Hunter. The other young girl and Mary exited the vehicle and made their way to the sidewalk. They got off at Hunter and Broad, which is about a block and a half from the pencil factory. No one got on with Mary at Lindsay Street. The young girl sitting next to her caught the driver's attention for the first time as they were leaving Broad and Marietta streets. Returning to the vehicle, the driver discovered the same young child seated next to her. During the cross-examination, the driver failed to inform one of the detectives that they may have been three or four minutes early that day.

The same girl recognized at the morgue was Mary Phagan, according to the streetcar conductor. When Mary Phagan boarded at Lindsay Street around 11:50 a.m. on April 26, he was on the English Avenue line. He recognized her as the same girl he had seen at the morgue, and several blocks away from where she boarded the bus on English Avenue, he paid her fare. He had no memory of EPS getting into the car that morning. Several blocks away from where she boarded the W.T. Hollis streetcar, on English Avenue, a conductor, recognized Mary Phagan as the same girl he had seen at the morgue and collected her fare.

One of the most crucial information in this audiobook is that Mary Phagan was sitting by herself when she boarded the front end of the car, that Mr. Matthews would inform her that she was late for work today, and that occasionally she would enter the building and express her annoyance at being late. She arrived that morning, and when Mr. Matthews asked her if she was mad, she replied, "Yes, I'm late," and she laughed before getting in the car and sitting down. The other significant information in this text relates to the murder of Mary Phagan, a young girl who was on a car scheduled to arrive in town at seven seven. The text also mentions that Mr. Matthews would tell Mary when she boarded the vehicle, "You are late today," and that occasionally she would come in and comment that she was angry that she was late. Although it is against company policy to arrive early in the city, arriving late is not prohibited. Harry G. Leo Frank's immediate assistant superintendent, Schiff, testified that he had never seen women brought into the office and that Conley had never been seen keeping an eye on Frank.

He claimed that Helen Ferguson had been paid off by him, not Frank, on the Friday before the murder, and that Ferguson had not requested Mary Phagan's pay. This situation demonstrates how crucial accurate watches and clocks were in 1913 and 2013, as well as how accurate they were then. The most significant information in this text is that witnesses like public accountant Joel Hunter and C. backed up Leo Frank's claim that his own testimony was adequate defense. C.E.Pollard. The plant stenographer, Hattie Hall, confirmed that she had worked with Frank until around noon and had clock-out at 2:00. As a result, Jim Conley's testimony that they arrived at the factory at 1245 and that he had gone into Leo Frank's wardrobe to hide from them while they spoke to Frank was refuted by Emma Clark Freeman and Corinthia Hall, who both stated that they had arrived at the factory for a brief visit at 1145. If the women were telling the truth, it would seem that Conley was off by a few hours. The timing of their visit is not important in any way because even its complete absence would have allowed Frank and Conley to move Mary Phagan's body and write the death notes in a few more minutes. The most significant information in this text is that Jim Conley repeatedly changed his story and contradicted himself, and Miss Magnolia Kennedy disputed the assertion that Helen Ferguson had requested Mary's pay. She also stated that she had never seen blood on the floor there prior to the homicide and that the hair that was discovered on the lathe in the metal room matched Mary. In order to demonstrate that Jim Conley had altered his story and repeatedly contradicted himself, the defense also called in Pinkerton detective Harry Scott. Miss Magnolia Kennedy denied Helen Ferguson had requested Mary's pay, but she did concede that Mary's hair matched that found on the lathe in the metal room and that she hadn't noticed any blood on the floor there until after the murder.

⁣⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that Helen Ferguson and Mary were close friends and neighbors, and that Helen didn't ask Mr. Schiff for Mary's money while he was there paying off. Following the swearing-in, Wade Campbell was informed of his interactions on the day of the murder. His testimony about how happy and playful Frank was before noon casts doubt on the bloodspot evidence and Frank's interactions with Conley, contrary to the defense's hopes that he would do so. His testimony about how upbeat and playful Frank was before noon casts doubt on the evidence, contrary to what the defense hoped he would do. This raises questions about the bloodspot evidence and Frank's interactions with Conley.

On Monday, April 28, Wade Campbell, a worker at the Pencil factory, spoke with his sister, Mrs. Arthur White. When she entered the factory on Saturday at 12:00 a.m. and left at 12:30 p.m., she saw a black person sitting at the elevator shaft, she told him. Although she couldn't see anyone, she could hear low voices. On April 26, she arrived at the factory around 9:30 and found Mr. Frank in his exterior office. She had never seen Mr. Frank converse with Mary Phagan. She and Mr. Frank went to the fourth floor on Tuesday, the day after the murder, but she missed seeing the Negro Conly interact with him. When she entered the factory after hearing low voices, she saw the Negro, according to a cross examination. A second look revealed that she visited Mr. Dorsey's office and signed a document that was about 21 pages long. Jim Conley has been seen by the woman twice since the murder reading newspapers on the fourth floor. The most significant information in this text is that Leo Max Frank appeared carefree and jocular in the morning of April 26, 1913. At four o'clock in the afternoon, Newt Lee arrived, unaware that Mary Pagan had passed away and only concerned about a potential downpour.

Lemme Quinn, a factory worker, testified that he had visited the facility and seen Frank in his office around 12:20. However, he hadn't mentioned this visit to anyone until days later, and even Frank had forgotten about it until Quinn came forward. Quinn acknowledged having promised Frank he would bring up the visit if it would be helpful. Indirectly, he indirectly confirmed the time of Miss Halls' and Mrs. Freeman's visit to the factory. Leo Frank was not agitated or tense when he was seen by Harry Denham, who was working on the fourth floor of the pencil factory the day of the murder.The Franks' black cook, Manola McKnight, had earlier admitted in a statement that she had overheard a conversation between the Franks and their wife in which the Franks admitted to killing a girl earlier in the day. Police were alerted to her statement by her husband, but she later recanted it, claiming that her husband was lying and that the only reasons she had signed it were a fear of going to jail and the detective's "third degree" tactics. ⁣Several of Frank's friends and acquaintances were called by the defense to attest to his overall good character.

A number of prosecution witnesses testified that Frank had made inappropriate sexual advances toward girls and young women, which gave the prosecution the opportunity to address Frank's character. The jury was given the impression that the defense did not dare to cross-examine any of the young women who gave evidence by their decision to forego doing so. One of the character witnesses for the defense had a pleasant surprise in store: "Miss Irene Jackson, sworn for the defendant, worked at the pencil factory for three years. Mr. Frank's character, as far as I know, was excellent. The only thing the girls ever mentioned about him was that they appeared to be scared of him. He simply approached the door and pushed it open. On two or three occasions, I overheard comments about Mr. Frank using the restroom, but I don't recall anything about it.
My sister was lying down in the room when I learned about his second visit to the changing area. He simply entered, made a turn, and left". The fact that Mr. Frank entered Miss Mamie Kitchen while the narrator was inside and kept quiet is one of the most crucial details in this statement. He kept staring at the girls without ever entering the room but not from the inner office, where he could have seen the girls sign up. The claims that Frank was very direct with the girls who worked for him were supported by Miss Jackson's account. The fact that Mr. Frank never entered the room and simply observed the girls is one of the text's most crucial details. From the outside office, he could have observed the girls signing up, but not from the inside. The accounts of Frank being frank with the girls who worked for him were supported by Miss Jackson's account. The fact that Mr. Frank never entered the room and simply observed the girls is the most crucial information in this passage. Leo Max Frank, the defendant, took the stand on August 18, 1913, to address the jury in his own defense.

He selected the final option, making an untrue statement that could not be cross-examined. Frank made that decision and his top-notch legal team either concurred with it or accepted it weeks in advance, despite the near certainty that it would be viewed negatively by the jury. Frank's speech was a mind-numbing nearly four hours long, and an astounding three of those hours were devoted to recounting the minute particulars of his office work on the day of the murder, primarily his financial entries and accounting book calculations in excruciating detail.

Even though it was almost certain that such a decision would be viewed negatively by the jury, Frank made it anyway, and his top-notch legal team either supported him or agreed with him weeks in advance. Leo Frank had three and a half hours to complete his office work and was the last person who had seen Mary Phagan alive. He had three more hours starting at three thirty, according to both the defense and the prosecution and anywhere from 3:00 p.m. to 06:00 p.m. to perform the necessary work. The goal of Frank's lengthy speech was to persuade his audience that the six and a half hours he had allotted for his calculations would not be sufficient, and that he would also need the noon hour. Why, if this were the case, did he initially intend to depart at 4:00 p.m. with his brother-in-law, to watch a holiday baseball game?

⁣The claim made by Leo Frank that he never knew Mary Pagan's name is absurd. For the entire 52 weeks that Mary Pagan worked for the National Pencil Company, Frank oversaw the payroll and entered the amounts in his accounting books each week. He also wrote Mary Phagan's initials, MP, next to her employee number and pay amount in these books each week. The entire 52 weeks that Mary Phagan worked for the National Pencil Company, he added his own handwritten initials, MP, next to her employee number and pay amount in these books. The factory's floor plans indicate that Mary Phagan worked in the middle room, and the only bathroom on the second floor, where Frank's office was, was in the metal room. In order to get to the restroom, Leo Frank, a frequent coffee user, had to walk directly past Mary Phagan's desk.

During the little over a year that Mary had worked for Frank, the employees put in at least 2860 hours working eleven-hour days, five days a week, and 52 weeks annually. Even if he only went to the restroom once every three hours, he would have passed Mary Phagan over 953 times in that time. Leo M. Frank mentioned quite a few female employees by name when asked by prosecutor Dorsey if he or she knew them or her by name. He also recommended that if he didn't know Mary in some way, J.M. Gantt would be unlikely to know that she was friendly.

In his unsworn statement, Frank continued, "The Author's Note: Mary Phagan left my office and apparently had made it as far as the door from my office leading to the outer office when she evidently stopped and asked me if the medal had arrived, and I told her no. Leo Frank had claimed that he overheard Mary talking to a different girl, a girl who had never shown up. No girl was found who had spoken to or met Mary Phagan at that time despite extensive research and interviews with everyone known to be in the area. The only other girl present, Monteen Stover, testified that she only saw an empty office. According to Frank's unsworn statement, Mary Phagan was fired because some ordered metal had not yet arrived at the factory. Mary Phagan had apparently worked in the metal department based on her question. Frank actually had the gall to imply that Mary Phagan had likely worked in the metal department based on her query. Everything Leo Frank said about the case is seriously called into question by his admission that he didn't know the dead girl by name or by sight.

When first questioned, Frank allegedly confessed to responding "I don't know," according to detectives. If it was I don't know, Leo Frank might have asked Mary Phagan to go with him to the Medal Room, where the prosecution, the police, and the detectives hired by the pencil company claimed the murder occurred. Leo Frank made the most shocking admission of all, or at least the most shocking admission he could make short of a detailed and humbling confession.

⁣The most crucial information in this text is that Leo Frank attempted to lessen the impact of Monte Stover's testimony by speculating that he might have gone to the bathroom or been concealed behind the safe door when she entered. This defense was unconvincing because, even if Frank had been perfectly situated behind the door, a young woman looking for work would probably just glance around it. Additionally, Frank was speculating that he might have been using the restroom—the one in the metal room—when Monte Stover discovered his office vacant and the evidence points to Mary Phagan's murder occurring there very same moment. This was also surprising because only a few weeks prior, Frank had adamantly asserted to the coroner's jury that on the day of the murder, he had not used the restroom once all day. Leo Frank was charged with killing Mary Phagan in the metal room's bathroom.

He acknowledged that he might have visited the restroom the following Monday, when Mary Phagan-looking hair strands and a five-inch bloodstain were discovered. He also acknowledged that he might have gone to the restroom where Conley claimed to have discovered Mary Phagan's battered, strangled, and lifeless body. He also acknowledged that he may have dropped Mary Phagan's body in the hallway where another bloodstain was later discovered after wrapping it in a sack and preparing to carry it to the basement. Although the stain was thought to be very old by the defense, Frank acknowledged that he might have been present at the scene when Mary Phagan was killed. Leo Frank changed his mind because of the impending rain, and his wife was present to see him on April 29, the day he was taken into custody at police headquarters, are the two most crucial facts in this text. He asked Rabbi Marks for advice on whether it would be wise to let his wife visit him on the top floor where he was surrounded by police officers, reporters, and photographers.
Following her husband's arrest, Frank didn't see him for 13 days, which might have been a reaction to her outrage over what she believed to be his alleged infidelity.

Since there are no reports of her making an attempt to see Frank again during those initial days, Frank's claim that she had to be restrained from actually moving into his cell is too extreme to be believed. Despite later retracting her claim, ⁣Mrs. Manola McKnight had claimed that Leo Frank told his wife that he had killed a girl the night of the murder.

⁣On his way home that evening, Leo Frank bought a box of candy to reassure his wife Lucille Selig of his love for her despite what he had done. Years later, it was discovered that she left clear instructions for her cremation and scattering of her ashes in a public park rather than being buried in Queens, New York, next to her husband. Frank continued by claiming Conley was never present at the factory or anywhere else on April 26, 1913, that he had no involvement in Mary Phagan's death, and that he had never seen him before. Leo Frank's admission of an "unconscious bathroom visit" was entirely ignored by The Atlanta Constitution and The Atlanta Georgian, which were adopting a pro-Frank editorial stance. It is unlikely that the words "call of nature" or "urinate" were deemed too shocking for the public to read about a brutal, strangulation murder since The Atlanta Journal did include the admission. The allegations that antisemitism was used as justification for Frank's prosecution and conviction will be examined in The Leo Frank Trial's upcoming episode.

Get a bonus gift on a 2 year plan here: https://brianjung.org/NordVPN. It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!
Sign Up on Shopify: https://brianjung.org/Shopify
Sign Up on Canva: https://brianjung.org/Canva

Sign Up For My Weekly Newsletter Here: https://brianjung.org/WeeklyNewsletter
Sign Up on Impact Here: https://brianjung.org/Impact

Video Outline
0:00 Introduction
0:53 Business Idea #1
4:35 NordVPN
5:55 Business Idea #2
9:08 Business Idea #3
11:33 Business Idea #4
15:02 Business Idea #5
16:47 Business Idea #6
18:34 Business Idea #7
20:37 Final Thoughts

Social Media:
⮕ 🖤 Follow Me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/thebrianjung
⮕ 🖤 Follow Me on IG: https://www.instagram.com/creditbrian
⮕ 🖤 Website: https://www.brianjung.co

—

This video may contain links through which we are compensated when you click on or are approved for offers. The information in this video was not provided by any of the companies mentioned and has not been reviewed, approved, or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.
Offers are current only as the time of the video publishing date and may have changed by the time you watch it.

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the links and other products that appear are from companies which Brian Jung may earn a small affiliate commission. The offers shown in these videos are competitively the best offers you can find all while supporting this channel.

Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor. Brian Jung does not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. This material has been prepared for entertainment purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction.

I use TradeZella to track and journal my trades.
https://bit.ly/TradeZella-TradingJournal

Follow my socials:
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/umarashraf/
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/UmarAshraf

Here are 7 Lessons I learned from making $15 Million Day Trading over the course of 10 years, Hope you enjoy :)

Chapters:
00:00 - Intro
0:12 Dont Trade Everyday
1:24 Adapt to the Market
3:12 Set Realistic Goals in Trading
5:30 The Importance of Managing and Accepting Risk in Trading
7:16 The Value of Journaling Trades for Every Trader
9:20 The Importance of Tracking and Playbooks in Trading
11:55 Trading Psychology and Managing Emotions
13:39 Managing Emotions in Trading for Long-Term Success
15:07 Long-Term Success in Trading


DISCLAIMER I am not a financial advisor and anything that I say on this YouTube channel should not be seen as financial advice. I am only sharing my biased opinion based off of speculation and my personal experience. You should always understand that with investing there is always risk. You should always do your own research before making any investment.

#daytrading #trading #daytrader