⁣On March 19, 1985, Alonzo Man died and the narrator was saddened. On March 6, 1986, Ferris Moore received a second pardon request for Leo Frank from the Board of Pardons and Parole. The board wanted to see the narrator and her father, but the reaction to the board's refusal of a pardon in 1983 did not subside. The new CEOs Wayne Snow Jr. and Mike Wing were informed that the Jewish community would again apply for a posthumous pardon, and that if granted, the pardon would be based on guilt or innocence. Allegedly, the state did not protect Leo Frank and his rights were violated. The Board thought the lynching of Leo Frank was wrong and that this pardon would heal old wounds. In September 1985, a renewed effort to seek a pardon began, and petitioners concluded that beyond the procedural steps of the trial, a pardon was likely possible by dealing with Leo Frank's out-of-court proceedings. reached. The court agreed in principle to grant a special pardon that did not imply innocence or guilt, but simply addressed the concerns raised by the case. After meeting with representatives of the applicants, the Board began drafting the final pardon order, which was approved shortly after ADL officials and others found it admissible. Families questioned why the acceptance of the application had not been publicly announced, and why the new application had not been made known to others who opposed the granting of the pardon. The Board was deeply concerned that Frank would set a precedent for numerous posthumous petitions for amnesty granted on purely legal grounds. Former Chairman Celis Moore announced the issuance of the pardon warrant at 1:00 am on March 11, 1986.
12:00 a.m. at the Georgia State Capitol. Board members ultimately agreed on the basis for the pardon, reflecting concerns that Frank's lynching had hampered his efforts to prove his innocence. The board also addressed three other legal concerns.
The rejection of lynching laws, the need to heal old wounds, and the perception of anti-Semitism. The question of whether Leo Frank really committed the murder was just dust in pardon negotiations.

From September 1986 until March 1986, the Commission took no action other than to confirm the accuracy of the final order. The final statement reads: On April 26, 1913, Mary Phagan, a 13-year-old employee of a pencil factory in Atlanta, was murdered. Georgians were shocked and outraged. Factory manager Leo M. Frank was indicted for the murder of Mary Phagan in 1913. He was held in prison for protection and sentenced on 25 August 1913. After the appeal was dismissed, the case was referred to Governor John M. Slayton for consideration. On June 20, 1911, the governor commuted his sentence from death to life imprisonment. On August 16, 1915, gunmen forcibly removed Frank from Mirageville State Penitentiary and lynched him. This ended the case and precluded further attempts to prove Frank's innocence. In 1983, the State Board of Pardons and Parole reviewed pardon applications suggesting innocence, but found no conclusive evidence of Frank's innocence.


⁣Georgia failed to protect Leo M. Frank and prosecute the lynchers. In 1983, the State Board of Pardons and Parole reviewed pardon applications suggesting innocence, but found no conclusive evidence of Frank's innocence. Recognizing that the state had protected Leo M. Frank personally and denied him further legal remedy, the State Amnesty and Amnesty Commission pardoned him and issued a copy of the Commission's hand and stamp. signed below. A pardon and parole were issued. The board was said to have been secretly working with the Jewish community for about a year, and its chairman, Wayne Snow, disclosed this in an interview with a television station. It bothered us.

Wayne Snow announced a pardon for Leo Frank, but it was kept secret. The pardon was reported in the media, and Mary Phagan's relatives said the pardon did not resolve the real question of Leo Frank's innocence or guilt. The author felt compelled to tell the familial aspect of Little Mary's story in order to educate the next generation of Phagans about their origins and Little Mary Phagan's true heritage. In January 1987, the story of Little Mary Phagan was reprinted in newspapers, and the media reminded readers that Little Mary Phagan's assassination spurred the beginning of the modern KKK. Now, the author's predictions that more books will be written and a TV miniseries will be produced about the case are starting to come true.

Will we ever know for sure who killed Mary Phagan? Did the answer go to the grave of everyone involved in the tragedy?

⁣

⁣The two most crucial facts in this audio passage are that there was no blood at the scuttle hole and that blood was discovered on the factory's second floor. Even though it was a holiday, the factory's foreman, Lemmie Quinn, entered and informed the narrator that he couldn't keep him away from the workplace. The narrator then collected their papers and went upstairs to visit the boys who were on the top floor.

Mrs. White claims that she passed by and noticed the narrator at 12:35. In order to see the boys on the top floor, the narrator then collected their papers and went there. In order to see the boys on the top floor, the narrator then collected their papers and went upstairs to visit the boys who were on the top floor. The most crucial information in this passage, according to the narrator, is that Albert didn't eat anything and came in close to 130. Before leaving and catching the car, he went to the dining room sideboard and stood there for a while.

The story was related to Craven by Manola McKnight's husband, who said these things to the officers, and he didn't consume anything in the dining room. If Gordon had not said it, then he was not deserving of the title of lawyer because he was down there and could have said it. The most crucial information in this passage is that Manola McKnight's attorney, George Gordon, sits there and watches as she puts her fist to the paper and makes a false swearing declaration that could land her in jail. Her attorney, George Gordon, could have obtained a writ of habeas corpus to have her released from custody as soon as he could have reached a judge.

But Craven and Albert were present, and Manola McKnight was seated there with her attorney, George Gordon, who was eager to introduce something into the case that these men had been requesting for a long time but had never been able to until he took the stand and swore that she had said something that was untrue as you can see from the questions I asked him. The two most crucial information in this passage are that Albert McKnight is accused of lying to the detectives and that he was reluctant to take over their operations for fear of alienating them. Additionally, he is charged with lying to a photographer as well as his wife, Mrs. Selig.
Additionally, Mrs. Selig and a photographer were allegedly deceived by Albert. Additionally, he is charged with lying to a photographer and his wife, Mrs. Selig. In addition, Mrs. Selig, Albert's wife, and a photographer are both charged with lying to them. He is also charged with lying to a photographer and his wife, Mrs. Selig. Additionally, Albert is charged with lying to a photographer and his wife, Mrs. Selig. ⁣The key information in this audio recording is that George Gordon, a man who is passing himself off as an attorney, permitted a woman to put her fist to a piece of paper and swear to it, sending her to the penitentiary.

Albert McKnight did not eat anything in the dining room, according to an affidavit Manola McKnight made in support of this man. Albert McKnight is supported by the evidence provided by the photos, Julius Fisher, and other people who entered the dining room after the sideboard had been moved, and it is clear that once the sideboard was adjusted, Albert McKnight had complete visibility of the entire space. That Albert stayed there for about five or ten minutes and checked himself in the mirror in the corner was a too-straight-forward and reasonable-sounding story. When Leo M. Frank entered the home on April 26 between 1:00 and 2:00, Albert McKnight was questioned about whether he saw him.

He says to Albert that he saw him enter the building between 1:00 and 2:00, that he stayed for only about 10 minutes, and then he left to go to town. Additionally, he says to Albert that he saw Manola enter the space but leave after just a few seconds in the dining room. Additionally, Albert claims to have seen Leo M. Frank leave the sideboard and return to the city, though Albert has never been inside the home and is unsure whether or not he actually did. The most crucial information in this passage is when Mr. Dorsey informed Mr. Craven, the manager of the plow department at Beck and Greg Hardware Company, that he had told the truth and was upheld. Mr. Dorsey was even more exhausted than he had anticipated on August 25, and he regretted the need for him to be postponed for another week—or rather, another Sunday. He had just finished a brief analysis of the defendant's statement and wasn't going to continue with a more thorough analysis because it would only cause him more trouble and he lacked the physical stamina. The defendant stated that his wife visited him at the police station and that she was there almost in hysterics, having been brought there by her father, two brothers in law, and Rabbi Marks.

These are the most crucial details in this audiobook. Rabbi Marks, who was with the defendant, advised him on whether it would be wise to let his wife visit the top floor so she could see the surroundings, city detectives, reporters, and snapshotters. The accused relies only on his own statement and offers no evidence of a living person to support his claim. Mr. Arnold disagrees with the claim that his wife didn't go there out of any sense of guilt on his part, but he does not take issue with any allusion to his wife's failure to make the trip to see him.

⁣The most significant information in this text is that Mr. Arnold disagreed with Mr. Dorsey's assertion that his wife never returned there because she was afraid of being photographed by snapshotters. Additionally, Frank mentioned that Conley had written him numerous notes with a pencil asking for a loan. Conley's card from the jeweler he purchased the watch from on an installment plan was discovered in the safe's drawer, and Scott there confirmed Conley's account of what happened when he told him not to take any more money out of the safe and the watch incident. That has never happened, according to Scott. The most crucial information in this passage is that Frank was aware of James Conley's writing prowess but chose to remain silent until the detectives linked him to the Phagan case. Frank was aware that Conley could write because he checked the pencil boxes and wrote numerous notes to him in an effort to obtain money. Conley also wrote the notes for Frank that he used to try and shift the blame for the crime to another man. Finding the author of the notes buried with the body was the most convincing evidence that could be used to identify the perpetrator of the crime. As stated in the notes, a Black person committed the crime. Conley visited the factory and jail, where he intended to confront Branch, which Frank and Branch talk about. Frank assured them that if they obtained Mr. Rosser's approval, he would speak with them and deal with Conley.

Mr. Rosser tried a case at Talua Falls, but he left afterward. Frank continues by informing the jury that no white man has ever been falsely accused of a crime by an ignorant, filthy black man and refused to appear in front of him. Furthermore, he notes that no other race has ever in its history had a white man who has been accused of a crime by an ignorant, filthy black man refuse to go up against him. A lawyer half as skilled as his client, Mr. Luther Z. Rosser, had a conscience of his client's innocence and would have confronted the accuser if he had falsely accused him of a crime. When he suggested that Frank engage in a filthy farce with a filthy Negro, he made his first and last statements, claiming that these addenda were unheard-of, that no one had ever dreamed of meeting them, and that Frank had no chance to do so. This is untrue because, when he first suggested performing the farce, he said that no one had ever heard of these addenda and that Frank had no chance to meet them.

⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that Mr. Dorsey is involved for his life and that Mr. Rosser has the right to interrupt him when he falsifies the truth. He also has the right to voice a valid objection, and Frank declined to face Conley in the meeting the detectives suggested when he was out of the city. However, Mr. Rosser has not objected to the fact that Frank declined to be confronted by Conley at the meeting suggested by the detectives when he was out of the city, and that if that meeting had taken place, he would have been aware of Conley's statement. The most crucial information in this text is that Mr. Dorsey has the right to comment on the defendant's behavior but is not permitted to do so while the defendant is presenting their objections to the court. Mr. Dorsey is free to comment on any behavior that falls within the purview of this trial, but he is not permitted to do so if his objection is upheld.

Mr. Dorsey has the right to comment on any behavior falling within the purview of this trial even though he is not outside of the record and is instead included in it. The most crucial information in this passage is that Leo Frank, a Cornell graduate and the factory's superintendent, declined to meet Jim Conley, a clueless black man, on the grounds that his counsel was out of town. He had the chance to learn at least some of the accusations Conley had leveled at him when his counsel reappeared. At twelfth hour on Tuesday, April 29, Frank went inside and conducted a neutral interview over there. Instead of getting involved with this Negro who was new to Lee, the man he had famously directed suspicion at in order to save his own neck, he did not behave like a man who wanted to discover the truth.
Frank did not make a sincere, honest, or diligent effort to uncover the truth in order to maintain his good standing with residents of Washington Street and Bennet Bryth members. The detectives emphasize the likelihood that couples may have been permitted access to the factory at night by night watchman Newt Lee, who had only been employed there for two or three weeks. This is one of the most crucial details in the text.
Due to the detectives' emphasis on the fact that couples frequented the area on weekends, holidays, and at night whenever other night watchmen were present, Lee effectively prevented the state from challenging or refuting his claim. The detectives emphasize that couples were in the factory while Newt Lee, the night watchman, was keeping an eye on things, even though Newt had only been working there for three weeks, Frank adds. This is due to the detectives' emphasis on the fact that couples had entered the factory while Newt Lee, the night watchman, was on duty, despite the fact that Newt had only been working there for three weeks.

⁣The defendant's claim that the alleged blood spots were actually paint and varnish rather than actual blood is the subject of the majority of the text's crucial details. In contrast, the defendant asserts that there was not even a single spot, much less a blood spot, on the floor where Barrett worked. The defendant also claims that he witnessed the girls drop paint and varnish bottles, causing them to shatter on the floor. The defendant claims that if fresh red paint or fresh red blood had been used instead, the haskelline compound with soap in it—a powerful solvent—would not have been applied in a liquid state and would instead have appeared pink or red instead of the white that it did at the time. The defendant also claims that he saw the girls drop bottles of paint and varnish, causing them to break on the floor. If that had been fresh red paint or fresh red blood, and that haskelline compound with the soap in it, which is an excellent solvent, had been applied there when it was still liquid, it wouldn't have happened, the defendant claims. The most crucial details in this audiobook series are the arguments put forth by the jurors in the Leo Frank case.

They contend that Hascline combined with the blood on the second floor would have had the same outcome as what the witnesses have testified to. Additionally, they contend that the testimony of Atlanta's city bacteriologist Dr. Claude Smith and doctoral witness Dr. Roy Harris contradicts the jurors' testimony. Finally, they contend that the jurors' testimony conflicts with the testimony of Drs. Roy Harris and Claude Smith. Last but not least, they contend that Dr. Roy Harris' testimony conflicts with what the jurors have said.

⁣The two most crucial details in this text are that Mr. Arnold called attention to the use of words that, in his opinion, no black person would naturally have used, and that Conley provided so much detail in his claims that he could not have been lying. Then he read excerpts from statements Conley had refuted as deliberate lies and highlighted how rich in detail they were. Following that, he read the statement from May 24 in which Conley admitted writing the notes. It showed three different times when Conley claimed to have written the notes.

The first statement about them was a blatant lie that was untrue and unreasonable, and the statements were not actually Conley's. When Conley made this admission, the jury made a significant discovery because, if Conley had stayed with Uncle Wheeler Mangum, he would have told the truth long ago. The two most crucial facts in this passage are that Dorsey erred in joining the pursuit and becoming a participant, and that John Black succeeded in having Conley's testimony changed by shifting the letters' writing dates from Friday to Saturday. Conley, a wretch with a lengthy criminal history and an inability to lie in specifics, admits to fabricating four pages of false information about every saloon on Peter Street.

In order to allay concerns that he was involved in the murder that took place on Saturday, he also changed the day on which he wrote the letters from Friday to Saturday. He added that he made the claim that he wrote the notes on Friday in order to allay concerns about his involvement in the murder that took place on Saturday, and that this is his final and accurate statement. The fact that the man made a statement voluntarily and honestly without the promise of reward and that he is telling the whole truth are the most crucial details in this text.

Even though he claimed he didn't visit the building on Saturday, he was there all morning on the day of the murder. He was either drunk or had enough alcohol in him to make his blood boil. He claimed that while keeping an eye out for Frank, he heard Mary Phagan scream, and that right away after hearing her scream, he allowed Monteen Stover to enter the building. Additionally, he claimed that while Frank and Mary Phagan were ascending the stairs, he heard Mary Phagan scream, and as soon as he did, he allowed Monteen Stover to enter the building. Additionally, he claimed that Mr. Frank had said, "Jim, can you write, what a lie.".

Conley had been writing for Frank for two years and was attempting to establish his own innocence when he claimed he was not in the factory on Saturday and detailed all of his activities for that day. Additionally, he swore that Mr. Frank locked him in a wardrobe until someone left after he heard someone approaching while he was in Frank's office. However, it is well known that they entered the factory between midnight and twelve in reality they entered between eleven and twelve. Conley was attempting to establish his own alibi when he claimed he was not at the factory on Saturday and listed all of the things he did elsewhere on that day.

⁣The most crucial information in this text is that Frank was able to fabricate the details of his statement about hiding him in the wardrobe when Emma Clark entered the room following the murder and that he obtained the factory girls' papers in order to gather information for the statement he had Frank make. Nevertheless, according to Frank's mother's testimony, his sister worked for a living in New York and that his father had a moderate income despite being in poor health. This is the foundation upon which the prosecution has built its case, and it is critical to keep in mind that this foundation is made up entirely of fabrications. The jury has been mistreated by Frank's family, who broke into his house and mistreated his servants, according to this text's most crucial details. Conley has shifted the date on the notes to Saturday, but he denies being aware of the murder.

Conley was interrogated for six hours on occasion by Scott and other detectives who yelled at him and made him feel uncomfortable in an effort to get a confession. Hooper believes that Conley's testimony should be dissected, but the court has not made this decision. It is difficult to determine when to believe him because he has lied so frequently. In an effort to persuade Jim Conley that Frank would not have written the notes on Friday, the detectives had Dorsey review the testimony and questioned him for six hours. Despite changing the date from Friday to Saturday, he insisted that he had nothing else to say.

The statement from May 29 demonstrates how they obtained Conley's statements in this way. They received nothing from Jim Conley regarding his knowledge of the killing of the young girl, and he merely claimed that Frank had mentioned the girl having fallen and that he had assisted Frank in concealing the body. Because he stood up during Colonel Rosser's cross-examination, the state boasted about him. While Scott, Black, and Starnes interrogated him and gave him general cues that they were here to testify in court, they were unaware of the negro's claims that he had seen the cord around the girl's neck, that Lemme Quinn had entered the factory, or that he had witnessed a number of other events. He claimed that Conley was now telling the truth and had disregarded Frank.

Conley had a revelation, and his friends Dorsey, Jim Starnes, and Patrick Campbell paid him seven visits. These are the two most crucial details in this text. Every time Dorsey and the detectives visited, Conley changed his perspective and saw things in a different way. Conley admits writing the notes, and it has been established by witnesses that he was present. It took the black man only two steps from where he was in the building's lobby to the elevator shaft before he grabbed the young girl's mesh bag and punched her in the eye. The story described here is more likely to be true than the one Conley tells about Frank. Assume Frank is no longer in the picture and Conley is being charged.

⁣
The most significant information in this text is that Conley never mentioned seeing Mary Phagan, Montane Stower, or Lemme Quinn enter. He now claims to have seen them all enter and that the state's representatives had convinced the black man to claim that he had heard Frank enter with her and emerge later while making a sly noise. Conley was aware of his obligation to appease the detectives, and the rope knot around his neck loosened as a result. They had forgotten, up until Conley took the witness stand, that the mesh bag and the pay envelope contained the real driving force behind this crime. Atlanta was never so stirred as it was by the Phagan tragedy, a terrible crime.

The defendant in court is the man who created the notes and was present, according to his own admission. Mr. Arnold requested that the sheriff open a chart that demonstrated that it was physically impossible for Frank to have committed the crime. When George Epps was arrested, he claimed that Mary Phagan and he arrived in town at around seven after twelve. Since they put up little George Epps and he claimed that he and Mary Phagan arrived in town around seven after twelve, the state has wiggled a lot in this situation. The most crucial information in this passage comes from two streetcar drivers named Hallis and Matthews, who claim that Mary Phagan arrived at Forsyth and Marietta at five or six minutes after twelve.

The State called witness McCoy, who never took his watch out of the sink until right before he was called, and had him swear that he looked at his watch at Walton and Forsyth and it read exactly 12:00. The State, however, accuses him of lying after introducing additional testimony to demonstrate a deviation from the timeline he had previously given. That the two streetcar men who knew the girl saw her is a given. The State's attempts to advance new theories about the period and theories that differ from those their own witness had sworn to are the most crucial information in this text. The State's own witness, George EPS, the streetcar schedule, and the testimony of Hollis and Matthews have all been used to demonstrate the passing of time.

According to Jim Conley's own statement, he began at four minutes before midnight and finished at thirteen o'clock, or 34 minutes in total. Conley took 50 minutes to go through the motions, according to Mr. Branch's calculations. Harley Branch claims to have been present when the detectives forced Conley to carry out what he claimed had occurred. Through his experiments, Dr. William Owen demonstrated that Conley was unable to complete those tasks in 34 minutes. The State has attacked almost everyone they have involved in the case, but Dr. William Owen, who demonstrated through his experiments that Conley could not have gone through those motions in 34 minutes, was not attacked.

⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that Mary Phagan, a young girl who was kind, innocent, and timid, entered the factory at about twelve minutes after twelve, and was killed by a black spider close to the elevator shaft. The spider was as consumed with obscene lust as he was with his desire for more whiskey and the black man. She was robbed, assaulted, and had her body thrown down the shaft before he later carried it back. He then wrapped the cord around her neck and left the body there. The text concludes by stating that there was still enough prejudice against his race in this nation to support such a heinous accusation against Frank.

The fact that Conley left the factory at 130 and Frank left at 01:00 is the most crucial information in this passage. Mrs. Levy is telling the truth when she says that a young girl who applied for a job as a stenographer in Frank's office saw him at ten minutes after one. Mr. and Mrs. Selig testified that they were aware that he came in at 120, but Dorsey claims they are Frank's parents and vile liars because they claim to have seen him do so. Despite being Jewish, Mrs. Levy is telling the truth. Mr. and Mrs. Selig testified that they were aware that he entered the stadium at 120, but Dorsey contends that they are Frank's parents and vile liars for making such a claim.

There are only two individuals in this situation who can be trusted to tell the truth: Conley Dalton and Albert McKnight. Albert asserts that he was present at the Selig residence when Frank entered and that he was uneasy and didn't eat. Additionally, he claims that Frank did not get on the car headed for town at Pulliam Street and Glenn. It was two men looking for a reward who signed the affidavit on behalf of Men Nola McKnight, the cook for Mr. and Mrs. Emile Selig. Following that, they questioned Manola as to why she hadn't told the truth like Albert.


The most crucial information in this text is that Starnes and Dorsey committed a crime when they imprisoned a woman without a warrant, which is why it is so important to remember that. Minola's attorney, George Gordon, pleaded with Dorsey to let the woman go, but Dorsey refused. A forewoman at the national pencil factory named Miss Rebecca Carson vouchsafed that Frank was a person of integrity. The woman and Frank entered the woman's dressing room when no one else was present, according to the state's introduced witnesses. The state asserts that Frank wouldn't have looked at the corpse, but he returned to the factory that afternoon and made out the financial sheet. The text also states that Geesling and Black did not swear to that, which is very important to the man over there.

The Leo Max Frank murder case was built on prejudice and perjury, and it's possible that the murderer has been identified. These are the two most crucial facts in this text. However, it is crucial to follow the law in circumstantial cases because there is no other explanation for the alleged crime. Conley is the only thing the State has to go on to support their case, and they have already established that Conley is a liar. Since their consciences will concur, it is crucial to write a verdict of not guilty, and your consciences will give your approval. .

The Leo Frank trial was the most unconventional occurrence in US legal history. The defendant's admission at the trial's conclusion amounted toward emulating a confessional session that had taken place earlier. The People versus Leo M. Frank murder trial, which lasted a month and took place in Georgia's Fulton County Superior Courthouse in the summer of 1913, included this admission. Leo Frank served as a National Pencil Company executive in Atlanta and as the 500-member Gate City Lodge's 500-member B'nai B'rith official president in 1912. The B'nai B'rith established the Anti-Defamation League, or ADL, as a result of the conviction, which has become now well-known andboth politically influential and extremely significant. The grandstand seats of the most spectacular murder trial in Georgia history were filled with spectators.

Eight defense attorneys were led by Luther Z Rosser, while the prosecution team was made up of three people under the direction of Hugh M. Dorsey, the solicitor general, and Frank Arthur Hooper. As well as Ruben Rose Arnold and Rosser. The Leo Frank trial started on July 28, 1913, and continued for several days, resulting in a series of horrifying revelations. The presiding judge, the Honorable Leonard Strickland Roan, was separated from the jury of twelve white people by the witness stand. Leo Frank's testimony on Monday, August 18, 1913, in the afternoon marked the most intriguing day of the trial, which took place three weeks later. Leo M. Frank's sworn statement would be subject to special conditions and rules, according to Judge Roan. ⁣ Leo M. Frank's sworn statement was to be made under special circumstances, and Judge Roan outlined those conditions and applicable laws.

250 spellbound people closed ranks and leaned forward in expectation as soon as he climbed the stand. He had a reputation as a gas jet from his college days, and he lived up to it now with verbose, monotonous speech, interruptions for three out of almost four hours, and endless pencil calculations to drive home his main points. Leo Frank showed the jury original pages from his accounting books throughout his almost four-hour speech. The Leo Frank trial, where he was found guilty of killing Mary Phagan on April 26, 1913, is where the majority of the text's most significant details are found. Leo Frank was charged with detailing the accounting calculations he had made on the afternoon of April 26, 1913, in an effort to convince the court that he had been far too busy to have killed Mary Phagan on that day, nearly 15 weeks earlier.

The defense emphasized how long it took Frank to complete the accounting books, but the real issue was: where was Leo Frank between 12:05 and 12:10 p.m? Monteen Stover testified that she discovered Leo Frank's office empty during this five-minute time period on Saturday, April 26, 1913, and the evidence had already established that Mary Phagan was killed between 12:05 and 12:15 p.m. Leo Frank was present in the same factory's metal room, which housed the metals.⁣There weren't many suspects in the building because April 26, 1913, Confederate Memorial Day, was a state holiday in Georgia and the factory and offices were shut down, with the exception of a few workers who came in to collect. Two investigators testified that Leo Frank had never left his office from noon until after 12:45, and if his alibi held up or was valid, he couldn't have killed Mary Phagan. However, April 26, 1913 was a state holiday in Georgia, commemorating the holiday and the factory and offices were closed. Frank claimed that he might have used the restroom during that time after talking about almost irrelevant topics for hours, putting him in the only publish washroom on that floor of the building—the metal room bathroom. This was even more remarkable considering that weeks earlier Leo Frank had firmly and ⁣ asserted and continuously insisted to the seven-person panel, chaired by Coroner Paul Donohue, that he did not use the restroom during the time of the murder.

Paul Donahue, a coroner who is both visually impaired and a prodigious savant, expressed his expected shock. He was surprised as one might expect. Leo Frank appeared to be attempting to physically and mentally get away from the bathroom where Jim Conley claimed to have discovered the body. ⁣Frank finally admitted that he might have used the restroom during that time after rambling on about near-irrelevant topics for hours. This put him in the metal room bathroom, the only restroom on that floor of the building. This was even more remarkable considering that Leo Frank had insisted, weeks earlier, to the seven-person panel, chaired by Coroner Paul Donohue, that he did not use the restroom throughout the day. ⁣It appeared as though Leo Frank was making an effort to get as far away as possible from the restroom where Jim Conley claimed to have discovered the body.

⁣At 3:56 p.m., Newt Lee entered the lobby on the second floor. m. Leo Frank requested that I spend two hours out on the town before returning at 6:00 p.m. The double doors halfway up the staircase were locked when Lee arrived back. When Leo Frank attempted to punch in a new timesheet for the night watchman Lee to register, Newt Lee saw his boss bungling and almost fumbling the timesheet on Saturday afternoons when he unlocked the doors and entered Leo Frank's office. It was revealed prior to the trial that Leo Frank had earlier informed Newt Lee that it was a National Pencil Company policy that once the night watchman arrived at the factory, as Lee had done the day of the murder at 4:00 p.m.

The most crucial information in this text is that Leo Frank was not permitted to leave the structure until he had turned over control of security to the day Watchmen company. This was brought on by the lack of resources, the danger of fire, and the high cost of the essential factory equipment. The two-hour timetable used to reschedule the postponed baseball game, the unexpected security rule waiver, the clumsy handling of a new timesheet, the locked double doors, and Frank's eerily animated demeanor were all highlighted by the prosecution. In the testimony of two African American witnesses, Janitor James, Jim Conley, and Leo Frank, a nearly demonic plot to capture the innocent night watchman Newt Lee was made clear. Leo Frank was placed between two layers of African Americans and the murder of Mary Phagan in the intricately designed plot for the twelve white men who would decide his fate.

The most crucial information in this text is that Leo Frank, a Jew who was considered white in the racial segregationist old south, was the one who initially attempted to blame the elderly, married, and unpunished African American Newt Lee for the rape and murder of Mary Phagan. In response to the defense team's intrigue, Jim Conley acknowledged he had assisted the real murderer, Leo Frank, with the clean-up after the fact in order to stop Conley from disclosing any more about the actual resolution to the crime. The new murder theory advanced by the defense team for Leo Frank was that Mary Phagan was attacked by Jim Conley as she descended the stairs from Leo Frank's office. They claimed that after Phagan entered the first floor lobby, she was robbed and then thrown through the two foot by two foot scuttle hole next to the elevator 14 feet to the basement. The Leo Frank trial is where the text's most significant details are found.

Leo Frank and Newt Lee were purposefully left alone in a police interrogation room at the Atlanta police station, where investigators set up a conversation between them. Leo Frank reprimanded Newt Lee for attempting to discuss the murder of Mary Phagan and warned him that if he continued, he and Lee would both enter hell immediately. Jewish opinion has become centered on the idea that Jim Conley, rather than 14-year-old Monteen Stover, who defended Leo Frank's character before accidentally revealing his false alibi, was the trial's key witness. Supporters of Leo Frank downplay the significance of Monteen Stover's trial testimony and Leo Frank's valiant attempt to refute it on August 18, 1913. In his 29-page commutation order from June 21–9, Governor John M. Slayton also disregarded the Stover-Frank incident.

⁣The most crucial information in this text is that many Frank supporters have chosen to downplay the importance of Monteen Stover by focusing solely on Jim Conley and then claiming that Jim Conley's absence prevented Leo Frank from being convicted. Only because no one ever foresaw the significance of Jim Conley telling the jury that he had discovered Mary Phagan dead in the middle room, has this question been left open for speculation. In the September 1915 issue of his magazine Watson's, Tom Watson addressed the "no conviction without Conley" controversy but it's time for a twenty-first century justification to explain why even the Georgia Supreme Court decided that the trial's evidence and testimony upheld Frank's conviction.

Leo Frank's four-hour long unsworn statement served as the trial's climax, and Frank was given the last word before closing arguments. Frank Hoover spoke for five minutes in his own defense without being sworn in, disputing the testimony of others that he knew Mary Phagan by name and had entered the dressing room with another worker of the business for ostensibly immoral purposes. Reiterating his "unconscious visit," he also says. Frank acknowledged in a newspaper interview that was printed in the Atlanta Journal Constitution in March 1914 that he might have visited another area of the building during this time that he couldn't clearly recall. He acknowledged that he didn't realize it would take force to achieve his goal when he followed the child back into the middleroom and that Jim Conley overheard a scream that sounded like a laugh that had been severed into a shriek. The stillness of the quiet building was broken by its sound.

Le continue ribellioni del Popolo d'Israele, portarono ad ira la santità di Dio al punto che li vece girovagare nel deserto per quaranta anni. Buona visione. Se tu non sei iscritto in questo canale ti consiglio di farlo adesso, per essere aggiornato/a sulle nuove pubblicazioni.

Contact: eliseo.paterniti@alice.it
Telegram: Eliseo Paterniti

⁣Drugs, guns, corruption: Australia paid suspect companies to run offshore detention

Former ASIO boss finds Home Affairs failed to conduct adequate due diligence when issuing contracts that saw public money paid to suspected criminals and corrupt officials.

⁣Globalists view Australia as ‘guinea pig’ for new online censorship regime

Protestors all across Australia rallied against the government’s plans to institute a digital-ID for citizens. This comes amid a broader push by the Australian government to censor so-called ‘misinformation’ online, which has seen the country’s regulators threaten X, Telegram, and other free speech platforms.

This showdown is part of a larger battle between globalists and patriots taking place all across the world, according to Simeon Boikov (@AussieCossack).

Original source: https://twitter.com/SputnikInt..../status/178710192031

⁣Reformed ex-climate alarmist, Tom Harris: Wind turbines "require a backup fossil fuel plant that continues burning 90% of the time, making the wind turbine largely unnecessary and, in essence, just for show."

"This is a far cry from the environmentally friendly image that is presented to the public."

⁣Donald Trump Jr. on his father’s conviction.


⁣Original source: https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/st....atus/179673848336654

⁣In case you’ve forgotten, here’s Joe Biden casually implying that Barack Obama is gay. From June of 2007.

Source: https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/st....atus/181484633497476

⁣Hezbollah CRUSHES the IDF and Embarrasses Israel in Stunning Defeat!
Interview for Dialogue Works

⁣Rockefeller CIA Connections to Deagel Depopulation Forecast

⁣The microplastic problem disrupts our hormones and potentially contributing to the rise of transgenderism

Tucker Carlson: Wonder if this is a biological response to these chemicals?

Dr. Calley Means: “70% of their calories that a child is eating today, is from a factory with industrial manufactured ultra-processed foods.”

⁣Ukraine loses thousands of men in Kursk while Borrell praises their 'strategic audacity'

If you are still delusional enough to believe that the West really cares about Ukraine, then here is evidence that they are, in fact, ready to sacrifice any number of Ukrainians just to spite Putin.

⁣Robert F. Kennedy Jr:

“Bill Gates Uses 'Philanthrocapitalism' to Enrich Himself”

Source: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/61554

⁣Israeli Police Officers Viciously Beat Up Group of Haredim Ultra Orthodox Jews Protesting Against Military Draft

Source: https://t.me/rtnews/70700

⁣Sky News Australiaa Political Editor Andrew Clennell reports that the ‘Combatting Misinformation & Disinformation’ bill does NOT have the support required from the Greens and Independents to be passed into law before the end of the year.

Source: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/62286

⁣Port strike leader Harold Daggett threatens, “I will cripple you.”

For those who don’t understand the significance of this news, this strike threatens to cripple the entire global supply chain and unleash widespread shortages. The impact will be felt across various industries, including food, fuel, auto, beverages, electronics, etc.

50% of imported goods come from these ports.

My instinct from the start has been that this is entirely by design.

Source: https://t.me/zeeemedia/17378

⁣US FIGHTING TO THE LAST MAN IN UKRAINE | ISRAEL | TAIWAN
Interview for Garland Nixon

Topics discussed:
▫ Iranian missile attack on Israel.
▫ US-Israel relations.
▫ Russia and sanctions. Russia's influence on the world market.
▫ China and Russia for a fair multipolar world.
▫ Historical conflicts and their consequences.
▫ Iran's nuclear infrastructure.

Source: https://t.me/ScottRitter/3035

“We will direct Law Enforcement to counter this extremism. We will hold Social Media Platforms accountable for the hate infiltrating their platform because they have a responsibility to our Democracy"

Confirmed: Kamala will take down free speech on Telegram and X if elected US President.

Source: https://t.me/AussieCossack/24081