⁣Julian Assange Claimed the CIA Plotted to ‘Kidnap and Assasinate’ in the Ecuadorian Embassy

On the CIA:

“It is now a matter of public record that under Pompeo's explicit direction, the CIA drew up plans to kidnap and assassinate me within the Ecuadorian embassy in London and authorized going after my European colleagues, subjecting us to theft, hacking attacks, and the planting of false information.

My wife and my infant son were also targeted.

A CIA asset was permanently assigned to track my wife, and instructions were given to obtain DNA from my 6-month-old son's nappy.

This is the testimony of more than 30 current and former US intelligence officials speaking to the US press, which has been additionally corroborated by records seized in a prosecution brought against some of the CIA agents involved.

The CIA's targeting of myself, my family, and my associates through aggressive, extrajudicial, and extraterritorial means provides a rare insight into how powerful intelligence organizations engage in transnational repression."

Source: https://t.me/zeeemedia/17370

⁣Australia's Ambassador to the United States Kevin Rudd: "Donald Trump is a Village Idiot and the United States is Incompetent Under Trump"

Source: https://t.me/AussieCossack/27102

⁣G20 Summit, Day 1: Declaration focuses on global hunger, conflicts & economic aid

RT's Egor Piskunov provides the latest updates from Brazil ahead of Day 2.

Source: https://t.me/rtnews/74478

Elon Musk की नींद उड़ा दी भारत सरकार ने😱 | A2 Motivation Facts about world's richest man


My Instagram:-
https://www.instagram.com/apnaytnews/

____________Thanks for watching 😊_____________

A2 The Real Hero


DISCLAIMER :- Please don't go out of your way to or hate on anyone I talk about in my videos, this channel is to entertain people and I usually focus on joking about what the people are doing not the individual themselves, please don't go spreading hate it's all for laughs.

COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER - Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

⁣We not only listened, but also heard each other — Lavrov on the negotiations

Other statements:

— Russia and the United States will ensure the earliest possible appointment of ambassadors

— Russia and the US will remove Biden's obstacles to the work of diplomatic missions

— We agreed that a process for Ukrainian regulation will be formed in the near future, the US will announce who will represent Washington, as soon as we find out who it will be, we will immediately designate our participant in the process

— There is reason to believe that the American side has begun to better listen to Russia’s position.

— Russia and the United States agreed that when their interests do not coincide, they should not provoke conflict, but solve problems

— At the same time, we will create conditions for our cooperation to resume in full and expand to a wide variety of areas.

— Representatives of the Russian Federation and the United States have been instructed to discuss what needs to be done to prepare for the meeting between Putin and Trump

Source: https://t.me/intelslava/73457

⁣Trump said many of the countries he has imposed tariffs on are "kissing his a*s" to negotiate tariff reductions.

"I'm telling you, these countries are calling us, kissing my a*s. Please, sir, make a deal. I'll do anything. Anything, sir," the US president said, speaking at a meeting of the National Republican Congressional Committee.

He noted that the Chinese do not do this because they are "proud people." But they still, in Trump's opinion, "want to make a deal."

Source: https://t.me/intelslava/74329

⁣A French travel blogger documents the destruction and atmosphere in war-time Tel Aviv

'We’re all shocked', she writes

Is this shocking?

Footage source: justine_in_israel

Source: https://t.me/rtnews/99625

Support CSS productions directly through www.Patreon.com/TheCommonSenseSkeptic

Four Part Series:

Part One: https://youtu.be/KeUvcJUdRK0
Part Two: https://youtu.be/cgyFL5Hzy-s
Part Three: https://youtu.be/hoCxDGbP00Q

April 2022, Chris Anderson interviews Musk in front of a live audience in Vancouver, BC to wrap up the TED Talk schedule. Anderson asked Musk about every project Musk has in the works, making it a great opportunity to get caught up with what Musk's current claims are for Tesla, SpaceX, Boring Company and Neuralink.

This finale tackles Musk's Twitter offer, and many of the claims he makes about Tesla.

#electricjesus
#debunkingelonmusk

⁣
Discover
how Food Research Lab helps brands with end-to-end food & beverage
product development, R&D, and formulation services. From idea to
market-ready success! ⁣

OUR DAILY OLDIES

⁣ELISHA SCHÄFFER EXPOSES LAWSUITS, SMEAR TACTICS & A COORDINATED CAMPAIGN TO TAKE HIM DOWN.
THIS IS THE FIGHT FOR HIS NAME—AND FOR THE TRUTH. WATCH NOW!!

The Gaddis Report, by @thelillygaddis

Interview with Elijah Schaffer @ElijahSchaffer

Apparently, freedom of speech has a price tag: $5,000,000. While the mainstream media ruins reputations daily with zero consequences, independent creators are being hunted down for memes and "mean tweets."

Elijah Schaffer breaks down the lawsuit filed by Alexis Wilkins and exposes the hypocrisy. They call it "harassment," but when they dox our families and threaten our livelihoods, it’s just "journalism."

The rules have changed. If we don’t push back now, this becomes the new normal for all of us.

00:37 - Introducing Elijah Shaffer and the defamation lawsuit
03:25 - The specifics of the lawsuit from Kash Patel's girlfriend
08:22 - The Shiloh Hendricks racial slur case
21:51 - Interview with Elijah Shaffer: The "Zionist gaslighting campaign"
28:03 - Coordinated attacks against Elijah Shaffer
33:48 - The struggle for funding and unity on the right
42:59 - The personal and spiritual toll of the attacks
48:38 - Infighting and fragmentation within the alt-right
58:57 - Shaffer's legal strategy and faith
01:05:30 - Conclusion and call to support Shaffer's legal fund

Source: https://x.com/ANRHeadlines/sta....tus/1993094388529115

⁣Leo Frank was convicted on Monday, August 25, 1913, following the jury instructions provided by Judge Leonard Roan. Leo M. Frank was accused of choking Mary Phagan with a cord that was wrapped around her neck in an unlawful manner and with premeditation to kill and murder her. The jury was sworn to hear the case after the defendant entered a not guilty plea to the charge. The State had to prove its case by providing the jury with proof that proved the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because the presumption of innocence was in the defendant's favor. Although beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury was not required to find him guilty.

Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of a human being in the peace of the State by a person of sound mind and discretion with malice of forethought, either express or implied. Express malice is the willful intent to unlawfully take another person's life that is demonstrated by external circumstances that can be used as evidence. When there is little to no indication of provocation and the entire situation surrounding the murder suggests a heartless, malicious intent, malice is presumed. Malice in a legal sense refers to a general evil plan rather than specific animosity toward the deceased. If a homicide is established to have been committed by the defendant, the law presumes that the defendant acted with malice, and the slayer may be found guilty of murder absent compelling evidence to the contrary.

Proof that the defendant committed the murder eliminates the presumption of innocence. It is the defendant's responsibility to defend the homicide after it is established that the defendant committed the murder. The rules of evidence, which are intended to discover the truth, are the most crucial details in this text. Direct evidence that directly refers to the subject at hand is the best type of evidence. Indirect or circumstantial evidence is that which only tends to establish the matter by proving various facts supporting by their consistency the hypothesis claimed to warrant a conviction on the basis of circumstantial evidence.

In addition to excluding all other reasonable doubt hypotheses other than the accused's guilt, the proven facts must be both consistent with and exclude the hypothesis of guilt. In a criminal case, the defendant has presented testimony attesting to his moral character, which the jury should take into account as one of the case's facts. Like any other substantial fact tending to establish the defendant's innocence, good character should be weighed and estimated by the jury. However, the jury must convict if the accused's guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt and to their satisfaction.

⁣The most crucial information in this passage is that the jury may take into account the defendant's good character if the rest of the testimony raises reasonable doubts about whether or not the defendant is guilty.
If the jury's perception of the defendant's guilt is reasonably raised by the consideration of the evidence and the defendant's good character, then the jury has a duty to grant the defendant the benefit of the doubt created by this and to find the defendant not guilty. When the term "character" is used in this context, it refers to the overall impression that person made on those who knew him before Mary Phagan passed away. When a defendant calls into question his character, the State is free to refute it by demonstrating that his reputation in general is not good or by demonstrating that the witnesses who have claimed that his character is good have misrepresented it.

The defense witnesses for the defense who were introduced to attest to his good character have the right to cross examine, and the Solicitor General has the right to pose any questions in this vein. The jury is not to consider this as evidence that the defendant has been guilty of any such misconduct unless the alleged witnesses testify to it, which is one of the most crucial details in this text. The Solicitor General was permitted to question the defendant's character witnesses about their knowledge of various acts of alleged misconduct on the part of the defendant.

Furthermore, when the defendant has called into question his character, the State is free to call witnesses to refute those who claim his character is strong by showing that it is weak overall. This testimony may be used by the jury, and they have the right to do so along with any other evidence that has been presented regarding the defendant's general character. To be found guilty of the crime for which they are accused, a defendant must, however, be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt based on all other evidence in the case. The most crucial information in this text is that the jury can acquit the defendant if they think that the defendant's overall character was strong before Mary Phagan's death. However, if the jury finds the defendant guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt, they have the option of convicting him and punishing him with the death penalty by hanging him from a tree until he dies.

The defendant would have to accept the most severe punishment for murder, which is to be hanged by the neck until he dies, if the jury decides not to proceed with the case. The jury has been instructed by Judge Roan that the court must sentence the defendant to life in prison if the jury finds him guilty and recommends that he be held in a penal institution. The defendant's statement, which is not made under oath and is not open to questioning or cross-examination, has been heard by the jury. If the evidence raises a reasonable doubt in the jury's minds, they may acquit the defendant and state in their verdict: "We, the jury, find the defendant not guilty.". Judge Roan concluded his charge to the jury by stating that if the jury found the defendant not guilty, the court would have to sentence him to life in prison.

⁣The jury began deliberation at 01:30 p.m. and at 04:39 p.m., they came to a unanimous decision. After a second and final vote, the verdict was guilty as charged and sentencing recommendation was without mercy, implying a death sentence for Leo Frank. The verdict was delivered to Judge Leonard A. Strickland Roan at 04:56 p.m. and each jury member was polled individually.

A BETTY BOOP CLASSIC FROM 1938

Other videos you might enjoy:Black America: White People ARE NOT Holding You Back...: https://youtu.be/xvsdMVG8kA4The Moment Everything Changed For Me | My Red Pill Journey: https://youtu.be/QUVcI7HLC2MCandace Owens' Thoughts on Martin Luther King Jr.: https://youtu.be/VxtXqVmkAuI#Candace #CandaceOwens #CandaceShow #Abortion #AntiAbortion #ProLife #ProChoice #Debate #Conservative #Liberal
www.anrnews.com

Julian Assange freed from Jail - and why many were smart enough to not take the Covid vaccines ? - Part 2

⁣ANR Conversations With Wayne Crouch And Lisa Johnston With Special Guest Errol Musk Father Of The Genius Entrepreneur And Ceo Of Space X And Tesla Elon Musk -5/5

⁣A special Raw Report address to the Nation

⁣Monkeypox a Cover for Covid Injection Side Effects, Warns Dr. David Martin

⁣Short video about 9/11 that perfectly illustrates the ritualistic nature, the symbology and the predictive programming sorrounding the event.

They know exactly what they are doing. These people are Satanic, it’s a ritual for them, a human sacrifice and a desecration of Christianity.

Source: https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel/61683

⁣Shocking...
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - Secret CDC Meeting About the Rise of Autism From Vaccinations
"So they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at kids who had not gotten it in 30 days. In other words, kids who got it later or didn't get it at all. And they compared these two groups. And among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was a... I think it was a 10,000% increased risk for a later subsequent autism diagnosis if you got in the first 30 days. They immediately knew what was causing it. It was 11.35%. So it's 1,135% increased risk. So they knew immediately, it's called a relative risk of 11.35. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed. This was 11.35. The link between cigarettes, smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35. So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called. They didn't want to do it on CDC campus because they thought it would be susceptible to freedom of information requests. So they did it in a very, in this remote retreat center called Simpsonwood, which is a Methodist retreat center on the wooded banks of the Chattahoochee River in a remote part of Georgia.

And they had all of the big panjarums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry, from the universities, who are the ones who test the vaccines, from NIH, CDC, FDA, the World Health Organization, the European Medical Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study. The first day, they were all... Somebody made a transcript of it. And that transcript was given to me.
And I published excerpts from it. But the first day, they're all talking about, oh my God, the lawyers are going to come after us. Nobody can deny this. This is bulletproof. There's no way to argue with this. This is real science. We can't, what are we going to do? The second day, they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public. And I published these things. Then I took a lot of heat at that point."

Source: Shawn Ryan Clips (YouTube)

Resources: https://x.com/newstart_2024/st....atus/183788971025914