Top videos
The TGA still has no idea as to why the vaccine causes myocarditis.
If they don’t understand the pathway of the vaccine to the heart, then how can they rule out that the vaccine doesn’t injure other organs in the body as well?
Had they done proper pharmacokinetic testing they would know this.
As for saying millions of people didn’t get injured, that is false. Most vaccinated people caught Covid. Over 10 million Australians caught Covid within 10 months of the borders being opened. So the jab wasn’t effective.
Then there’s the 26,000 more deaths in 2022 than 2019 and the 140,000 reported injuries. And let’s not forget the extra 9,000 deaths in 2021 when there was no Covid in the community.
The question also needs to be asked as to whether or not people actually received intact mRNA or mRNA at all? The vaccines needed to be stored at negative 70 degrees and the lipids had to be emulsified to ensure an even distribution. The manufacturing process was never throughly tested or had consistent quality assurance processes implemented.
For example there were 5 doses in one vial. There is no guarantee that the vaccines were delivered evenly from each vial or that each had the same amount. I.e. 150 micrograms which is a very small amount.
So rather than claiming the vaccine was safe because people didn’t get injured, it’s probable that for some people, the vaccine was never actually delivered effectively in the first place.
CLASSIC CARTOONS
Niger vs Australia. Same Population Size. The Very Low Vaccination Rate in “Developing World” Niger vs Very High Vaccination Rate in “State of the Art Unlimited Funds and Mandated Healthcare Australia”
Niger vs Australia. Same population size. Very low vaccination rate in "developing world" Niger vs very high vaccination rate in "state of the art unlimited funds and mandated healthcare Australia". Who fared better?
https://www.australiannational....review.com/health/ni
The most important details in this text are the sentencing and aftermath of Leo Frank's trial. Judge Roan secretly brought Frank and the other principals together in the courtroom for the formal sentencing. The sentence read, "Leo M. Frank be taken from the bar of this court to the common jail of the county of Fulton and be safely there kept until his final execution in the manner fixed by law." On the 10th day of October 1913, the defendant was executed by the sheriff of Fulton County in private, witnessed only by the executing officer, a sufficient guard the relatives of such defendant and such clergyman and friends as he may desire, and that the defendant, between the hours of 10:00 A.m. and 02:00 p.m., be by the sheriff of Fulton County hanged by the neck until he shall be dead and may God have mercy on his soul." The trial had been the longest and most expensive trial in Georgia history, with the stenographic record being 1,080,060 words. The state star witness, Jim Conley, had been on the witness stand longer than any other witness in state history Judge Roan was Rosser's senior law partner from 1883 to 1886. The temper of the public mind was such that it invaded the courtroom and made itself manifest at every turn the jury made. This prejudice rendered any other verdict impossible. Frank's lawyers began to prepare their appeal immediately after the sentencing, including affidavits about the alleged prejudice towards Leo Frank of two members of the jury, A. H. Hensley and M. Johanning. The family of H. C. Lovenhard swore that on meeting Marcellus Johenning on the street before the trial he had told them, "I know he is guilty". Other points raised included the jurors being influenced by the crowd's demonstrations outside the courtroom and that the evidence did not support the verdict. Solicitor General Dorsey argued that the trial had been fair and countered with affidavits from eleven jurors who swore they did not hear or see demonstrations from crowds outside the courtroom. Both jurors who had been deemed prejudiced by the defense denied the charges. Rosser and Arnold made a final plea to Judge Roan, who denied the defense's motion for a new trial. The ruling was affirmed by the Georgia Supreme Court on February 17, 1914. Two judges, Beck and Fish, dissented on the question of admissibility of Jim Conley's testimony as to Frank's sexual perversion, but did not find the evidence in question sufficient cause to alter the guilty verdict. Not long after the Georgia Supreme Court decision, the Atlanta Journal reported that the state biologist who examined the body of Mary Phagan had concluded that the hair found on the lathe which the prosecution had cited as a major factor in its case, was not Mary Phagan's. The biologist told Solicitor General Dorsey that he did not depend on the biologist's testimony, as other witnesses in the case swore that the hair was that of Mary Phagan. The most important details in this text are that several prosecution witnesses retracted their original testimony, including Albert McKnight, Mrs. Nina Formby, George Epps, Jr., and Mary Phagan. Other witnesses conveyed that they had invented or lied about evidence due to the pressure brought by police detectives and solicitor Dorsey. In addition, the defense lawyers restudied the case, including Henry Alexander, who studied the murder notes allegedly written by Conley at Frank's direction, which were written on old carbon pads and had a dateline of September 19.
Mr. Alexander alleged that the words "night witch" in the note beside Mary Phagan's body, which had been interpreted to mean night watch or watchman by those who believed the notes had been written under the direction of a white man, actually referred to a negro folktale. On March 7, 1914, Frank was resentenced to die. A stay of execution was obtained on an extraordinary motion for a new trial based on newly found evidence. Three witnesses said the state's star witness, Jim Conley, was the killer. Annie Maud Carter in New Orleans said Conley told her he had called Mary Phagan over as she left Frank's office with her pay envelope, hit her over the head, and pushed her over a scuttle hole in the back of the building.
The most important details in this text are that Annie Maud Carter gave the Burns Agency some love letters from Conley which the Constitution said were so vile and vulgar that they couldn't be published in the newspaper. The defense contended that these love letters showed that Conley had perverted passion and lust. A black prisoner named Freeman told his story to the prison doctor, who reported that Conley was the killer. Conley's court appointed attorney, William Smith, thought Frank was innocent and made a public statement on October 2,114, saying that Conley's testimony was a cunning fabrication. This extraordinary revelation, which went against the lawyer client confidentiality privilege, was extolled by those who believed in Frank's innocence and castigated as being caused by bribery by those who believed him guilty.
William Smith revealed no new facts to support his beliefs, but instead tried to show how the already known facts had been misinterpreted due to Conley's lies. It has been said that Jim Conley confessed to William Smith, and a confession statement allegedly by Conley has been published in For One confessions of a Criminal Lawyer by Alan Lumpkin Henson. However, Walter Smith, William Smith's son, denied the authenticity of Conley's "confession", but brought to light facts which had been previously undisclosed regarding William Smith's relationship to his client. William Smith was reputed to be a very conscientious and ethical lawyer, and his prime obligation was to his client. He had been appointed to defend Conley by the court and he worked very closely with the prosecutor, Hugh Dorsey.
Smith believed in Frank's guilt and coached Jim Conley in how to react in the courtroom. He acted out the style and gyrations of Luther Rosser to Conley so well that when the actual trial was in session, Conley was not rattled in the least. Smith went to great lengths to defend Conley and to dig up facts against Frank. At some point in the course of the trial, Smith began to doubt that his client had been telling the truth and tried to get him the lightest sentence possible. Conley was convicted as an accessory to the fact and sentenced to one year on the chain gang. Smith felt morally and legally free to do some investigating and probing on his own.
William Smith believed that Leo Frank was innocent and that he himself was responsible for his conviction. He launched a thorough investigation which convinced him that Frank was innocent and that Conley was guilty. He went to Governor Slayton with his conclusions and his story was important in helping Slayton reach the decision to commute Frank's sentence. Smith's life was threatened and he and his family were forced to leave Georgia. In the last years of his life, Smith's vocal cords were paralyzed and he carried a pad of paper on which to write messages in the hospital room.
On May 8, 1914, superior court Judge Ben H.Hill denied the defense motion for a new trial, which was affirmed unanimously by the Georgia Supreme Court. Jewish organizations and groups raised the issue of religious prejudice before Leo Frank's trial ended. The appeals for funds for Leo Frank's defense were made through mailing, circulars and newspaper advertisements throughout the country and particularly in the north. This resulted in a virtual reenactment of the Civil War between Northern and southern newspapers, which increased in intensity as the trial progressed. The New York Times and Colliers Weekly called for a new trial, mass rallies were held in United States cities, and thousands of letters, petitions and telegrams were sent to Governor Slayton and soon to be Governor Nat Harris.
However, the conviction of Frank became an article of faith for Southerners and the belief in Frank's innocence became the litmus test in the Jewish community of Atlanta for antisemitism. On March 10, 1914, the Atlanta Journal editorially called for a new trial, saying that if Frank is found guilty after a fair trial, he should be hanged and his death without a fair trial and legal conviction will amount to judicial murder. The most important details in this text are that the court, lawyers, and jury were not able to decide impartially and without fear the guilt or innocence of an accused man. The atmosphere of the courtroom was charged with an electric current of indignation, and the streets were filled with an angry, determined crowd ready to seize the defendant if the jury had found him not guilty. When the jury returned the guilty verdict, Frank was not in the courtroom, but at the Fulton Tower.
Cheers for the prosecuting counsel were irrepressible in the courtroom throughout the trial, and on the streets, unseemly demonstrations and condemnation of Frank were heard by the judge and jury. The judge was powerless to prevent these outbursts in the courtroom and the police were unable to control the crowd outside. The Fifth Regiment of the National Guard was kept under arms throughout the night, ready to rush on a moment's warning to the protection of the defendant. The press of the city united in an earnest request to the presiding judge to not permit the verdict of the jury to be received on Saturday, as it was known that a verdict of acquittal would cause a riot. Frank was tried and convicted, but the evidence on which he was convicted is not clear.
The outbursts in the courtroom and the police were unable to control the crowds outside were events that all three newspapers had not printed during the trial. The Journal remained quiet about these events for a year.
The Atlanta Georgian, which was silent during the trial, later called for a new trial. Tom Watson, who had been defeated for vice president of the United States on the populace ticket in 1896, immediately launched a scathing attack against those criticizing the results of the Frank case. He referred to Frank as being a Jew pervert and said he denied justice to the family of a poor factory girl. Burns offered a $1000 reward to anyone who could provide evidence that Frank was a sexual pervert, but no one came forward. Burns also brought forth evidence given to him by the reverend C.B.Ragsdale, pastor of the Atlanta Baptist Church, who told the story of overhearing two black men, one of whom confessed to killing a little girl at the factory the other day. Later, Ragsdale repudiated his statement. A Burns operative, Mr. Toby, had been retained by members of the Phagan family and their neighbors to investigate the murder and discover the murderer. After several weeks of investigating, Toby resigned and announced that he had concluded that Frank was the guilty party. Dorsey alleged that Burns tried to bribe witnesses to give false testimony.
The hearing on extraordinary motion for a new trial was based on the absence of Frank at the reception of the verdict. On December 7, 1914, a writ of error was taken to the United States Supreme Court and was denied. Frank was sentenced to be hanged on January 22, 1915. Frank's attorneys then filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus to the United States Supreme Court on April 19, 1915. The two justices who dissented were Oliver Wendell Holmes and Charles Evans Hughes.
They dissented on the basis that a lower court hearing should have been held to determine the validity of the defense. The most important details in this text are that Governor John Slayton was the only hope left for Frank, and his attorneys appealed to him for a commutation of his sentence from hanging to life imprisonment. Slayton referred this request to the state Prison Commission and asked them to pass their recommendation to the governor. Meanwhile, Frank's attorneys filed an appeal for a clemency hearing before the three man Georgia Prison Commission. The hearing date was scheduled for May 31, 1915.
On May 31, 1915, out of state and in state delegations appeared to plead for Frank's life. They had submitted voluminous documents to convince the commission an error had been made, including a letter by presiding Judge Leonard Roan written shortly before his death on March 23, 1915. Some members of Roan's family doubted the authenticity of the letter for years, but Dr. Wallace E. Brown, owner of the Berkshire Hills Sanatorium, attested to Roan's rational mental state. Brown also stated that he has been a resident of North Adams, Massachusetts, practically all his life, and is now serving his third term as mayor of the city of North Adams.
On Sunday, November 20, 1914, Judge L.S. Roan of Atlanta, Georgia dictated a letter to Mrs. Wallace E.Brown of North Adams, Massachusetts, asking for executive clemency in the punishment of Leo M. Frank. The letter was written by Judge Roan of Atlanta, Georgia, to Mrs. Wallace E.Brown, who was then Miss Jane Deity. The letter expressed the deponent's uncertainty of Frank's guilt due to the character of the Negro Conley's testimony. The letter also stated that the chief magistrate of the state should exert every effort in ascertaining the truth, and that the execution of any person whose guilt has not been satisfactorily proven to the constituted authorities is too horrible to contemplate. The deponent heard Judge Roan dictate the letter before copied and saw him read and sign the name.
Judge Roan had stated to Deponent that he was not convinced of Frank's guilt and that if executive clemency were asked for Frank, he intended to recommend commutation. The next morning, some 50 determined looking men from Cobb County marched into the Prison Commission office and demanded the hearing be reopened. They included former governor Joseph M. Brown and Herbert Clay, solicitor of the Blue Ridge Circuit. Clay spoke for hours against Commutation arguing that Georgia would be dishonored for all time if Frank were spared for his alleged abominable crime. The commission reopened the hearing and the commissioners listened intently and said nothing.
At the end of the reopening, they issued a statement that they would offer their recommendation to Governor Slayton in a week by a two to one vote. On June 1915, the commissioners refused to recommend commutation to Governor Slayton, leaving it up to the governor.
Should you vote yes or no to the “Voice” ? Jamie discusses the Voice vote with Australian Lawyer and
Should you vote yes or no to the “Voice” ? Jamie discusses the Voice vote with Australian Lawyer and human rights advocate Tony Nikolic - Part 2
RFK TERMINATES mRNA Vaccine Research
The shots actually ‘encourage new mutations’ and ‘prolong pandemics’
‘More risk than benefits’
Remember they told you it was ‘safe and effective’?
Source: https://t.me/rtnews/105527
Tesla owners in China are demanding a refund.
Tesla owners in China protest surprise price cuts, demand refunds
Hundreds of Tesla owners gathered at the automaker’s showrooms and distribution centers in China over the weekend, demanding rebates and credit after sudden price cuts they said meant they had overpaid for electric cars they bought earlier.
On Saturday, about 200 recent buyers of the Tesla Model Y and Model 3 gathered at a Tesla delivery center in Shanghai to protest against the US carmaker’s decision to slash prices for the second time in three months on Friday.
Many said they had believed that prices Tesla charged for its cars late last year would not be cut as abruptly or as deeply as the automaker just announced in a move to spur sales and support production at its Shanghai plant. The scheduled expiration of a government subsidy at the end of 2022 also drove many to finalize their purchases.
Videos posted on social media showed crowds at Tesla stores and delivery centers in other Chinese cities from Chengdu to Shenzhen, suggesting wider consumer backlash.
After Friday’s surprise discounts, Tesla’s EV prices in China are now between 13% and 24% below their September levels.
Analysts have said the move by Elon Musk’s Tesla was likely to boost its sales, which tumbled in December, and force other EV makers to cut prices too at a time of faltering demand in the world’s largest market for battery-powered cars.
While established automakers often discount to manage inventory and keep factories running when demand weakens, Tesla operates without dealerships and transparent pricing has been part of its brand image.
“It may be a normal business practice but this is not how a responsible enterprise should behave,” said one Tesla owner protesting at the company’s delivery center in Shanghai’s Minhang suburb on Saturday who gave his surname as Zhang.
He and the other Tesla owners, who said they had taken delivery in the final months of 2022, said they were frustrated with the abruptness of Friday’s price cut and Tesla’s lack of an explanation to recent buyers.
Zhang said police facilitated a meeting between Tesla staff and the assembled owners at which the owners handed over a list of demands, including an apology and compensation or other credits. He added the Tesla staff had agreed to respond by Tuesday.
About a dozen police officers could be seen at the Shanghai protest and most of the videos of the other demonstrations also showed a large police presence at the Tesla sites.
Protests are not a rare occurrence in China, which has over the years seen people come out in large numbers over issues such as financial or property scams, but authorities have been on higher alert after widespread protests in Chinese cities and top universities at the end of November against COVID-19 restrictions.
‘Return the money’
Other videos appearing to be of Tesla owners protesting were also posted to Chinese social media platforms on Saturday.
One video, which Reuters verified was filmed at a Tesla store in the southwestern city of Chengdu, showed a crowd chanting, “Return the money, refund our cars.”
Another, which appeared to be filmed in Beijing, showed police cars arriving to disperse crowds outside a Tesla store.
Reuters was unable to verify the content of either video.
Tesla does not plan to compensate buyers who took delivery before the most recent price cut, a spokesman for Tesla China told Reuters on Saturday.
He did not respond when asked to comment on the protests.
China accounted for about a third of Tesla’s global sales in 2021 and its Shanghai factory, which employs about 20,000 workers, is its single most productive and profitable plant.
Analysts have been positive about the potential for Tesla’s price cuts to drive sales growth at a time when it is a year from announcing its next new vehicle, the Cybertruck.
“Nowhere else in the world is Tesla faced with the kind of competitors that they have here [in China],” said Bill Russo, head of consultancy Automobility Ltd in Shanghai.
“They are in a much bigger EV market with companies that can price more aggressively than they can, until now.”
In 2021, Tesla faced a public relations storm after an unhappy customer climbed on a car at the Shanghai auto show to protest against the company’s handling of her complaints about her car’s brakes.
Tesla responded by apologizing to Chinese consumers for not addressing the complaints in a timely way.
Pete Evans…
On 2Day FM
Pete was one of the very few celebrities who called it out,
long before convid.
Were there even any other ones at all?
Major brands dropped Pete,
the media character assassinated him endlessly…
and he just kept rising and growing and expanding and transcending ALL OF IT.
All these years later,
he’s been proven right and vindicated as a visionary man.
When they interview him,
they really don’t know how to handle him.
He’s outside the matrix now,
and the agents of the construct really can’t comprehend what it’s like to be external to the program that they are still controlled by.
Great interview…
the full chat is here👇
https://omny.fm/shows/hit-sydn....ey-breakfast/full-in
The Truth About the Murder of Mary Phagan - Jake Shields Interview with Mary Phagan-Kean on the Figh
The interview with Mary Phagan-Keane, grandniece of 13-year-old Mary Phagan, killed in 1913 at Atlanta’s National Pencil Factory, delves into her personal exploration, research, and stance on the contentious Leo
Frank case. Frank, the factory superintendent convicted of the murder, remains a divisive figure amid accusations of antisemitism and historical reinterpretation, particularly by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
Personal Connection and Discovery
Family Silence: Named after her great-aunt, Mary learned of the murder at 13, as her family, guided by her great-grandmother, had concealed it. Her mother discovered it concurrently.
Traumatic Experience: At R.V. Stall High School in Charleston, a teacher’s query about her link to Mary Phagan, followed by classmates’ taunts about being “dead” or “reincarnated,” profoundly impacted her.
Father’s Perspective: Surprised the case resurfaced, her father briefly labeled Frank a “sexual pervert” who murdered Mary after she collected her wages and was later lynched by a vigilance group.
Curiosity and Research
Growing Fascination: After relocating to Atlanta at 15, frequent questions from teachers at Shamrock High School about her connection sparked her interest in the case’s significance and her father’s reticence.
Archival Revelation: At the Georgia Archives, a vivid image of Frank’s lynching motivated Mary to seek the truth, with her father encouraging independent investigation.
Research and Evidence Collection
Archive Donation: Mary contributed her 57-year collection of case documents to the Georgia State Library to challenge claims of Frank’s innocence.
Source Analysis: Early books (1913–1950), such as Guilty or Not Guilty by Francis X. Bush, provided balanced views, while later works like Night Fell on Georgia and A Little Girl Is Dead showed inconsistencies. The trial transcript is missing, but Mary possesses a “brief of evidence” supporting Frank’s guilt.
Case Details and Evidence
Crime Summary: Mary Phagan was murdered after collecting her $1.20 paycheck. Frank’s conviction hinged on his inappropriate conduct, inconsistent statements, and physical evidence.
Grand Jury and Witnesses: A grand jury with four Jewish members unanimously indicted Frank, undermining antisemitism claims. Witnesses verified Frank’s harassment, contradicting his claim of unfamiliarity with Mary.
Defense Tactics: Frank’s eight-lawyer team employed racial strategies, implicating Black janitor Jim Conley and planting evidence linked to Frank.
Trial Result: Frank was convicted in four hours, with 13 appeals rejected and no court questioning his guilt. Alleged bite marks and murder notes were later disproven as fabrications.
ADL and Historical Revisionism
ADL’s Role: Established partly to defend Frank, the ADL is accused of concealing evidence, manipulating search results, and destroying records to frame Frank as a victim of antisemitism.
Alonzo Mann’s Testimony: In 1982, Mann’s inconsistent claim of seeing Conley with Mary’s body spurred a pardon effort, which Mary believes was coerced. The 1983 pardon request was rejected.
1986 Pardon: A discreet posthumous pardon, backed by the ADL, was granted without addressing Frank’s guilt, excluding Mary’s family.
Grave Marker Issue: A 1994 marker for Mary Phagan’s grave was replaced in 1995 after a rabbi’s objections, omitting key details. Mary later installed her own marker.
Countering Misinformation
Antisemitism Claims: Mary points to the Jewish grand jury members and absence of antisemitic references in newspapers to debunk bias allegations. Frank’s mother’s comment was the sole instance.
Vigilance Committee: The lynchers, prominent Marietta citizens, acted for justice, not antisemitism, despite ties to the Ku Klux Klan.
Media Distortions: Later books, an NBC miniseries, and the Parade musical misrepresented the case, falsely depicting Mary Phagan as flirtatious.
Ongoing Advocacy
Conviction Integrity Unit: In 2019, the ADL and others pushed for Frank’s exoneration, but Mary found no public records, indicating secrecy.
Public Engagement: Through her website, littlemaryphagan.com, and a 2025 book with 16 new chapters, Mary seeks to expose ADL tactics. She uses podcasts and Twitter community notes to counter misinformation.
Personal Reflections
Emotional Toll: Discovering the case at 13 was distressing, and Mary remains troubled by her great-aunt’s defamation.
Family Support: Her adoptive Jewish grandparents and her father’s Jewish friend supported her work, emphasizing her focus on ADL manipulation, not the Jewish community.
Life’s Purpose: Childless due to her husband’s illness, Mary views her research as her mission to honor Mary Phagan’s legacy.
Conclusion
Mary Phagan-Keane’s interview highlights her lifelong commitment to preserving her great-aunt’s memory against ADL-led efforts to clear Leo Frank. Through thorough research, she has debunked falsehoods and upheld evidence, framing the case as a pursuit of justice for a murdered girl, not a matter of antisemitism.
West Australian Councillor Adrian McRae Continues to be Under Attack by the Australian Media this Mo
Warning Graphic: New footage published by Al Jazeera shows Israeli soldiers in Western Gaza reportedly killing two civilians and then burying them in the sand with bulldozers
The IDF has claimed the footage was edited and that the matter requires additional examination.
Iranian delegation forced into last-minute aircraft switch after talks — Prof Marandi.
Says JD Vance abruptly ended talks — with WaPo piece 'sending a message'.
'Changed planes, landed in Mashhad instead of Tehran' — 'Iranians felt threatened'.
'No one wanted to stay in Pakistan'.
Source: https://t.me/rtnews/145516
Here is the "New Normal"...people dropping dead after the vax kill shot
https://www.australiannational....review.com/covid-19-
🪙 READ LINK 🪙
https://www.activistpost.com/2....023/04/dollars-destr
Dollar’s Destruction and Rollout of CBDC
Activist Post
🔎 LEARN, READ, WATCH MORE 🔍
■ https://digitalcurrency.truthparadigm.tv
Artist we like that does custom, one-of-a-kind drawings: https://allinthedetails.art
#DigitalCurrency #DigitalMoney #CBDC #15MinuteCities #CentralBank #Crypto #MonetaryPolicy #TheFed #Banks #Banking #Monetary #BlockChain #Money #WEF #NWO #TreasureMap #Keystone #Leapfrog #WWG1WGA #SocialCredit #Prophecy
This powerful documentary from Good Lion Films, produced and written by Nick Alvear, shares the Cabal takedown from the 2016 election, to the capitulation tour of President Donald J. Trump, Covid-19, the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s funeral, J6 setup, and how the continuity of government through the current events taking place will usher in the greatest time ever known on earth.
Please consider supporting Nick Alvear.
You can watch many of his ‘Red Pill’ films at https://GoodLion.tv
📚 CREDIT LINK 📚
https://www.goodlion.tv/?wix-vod-video-id=786652ead8e14052b9963779331c3538&wix-vod-comp-id=comp-lii68e5d
➖
September 2023
➖
🔎 LEARN, READ, WATCH MORE 🔍
https://cabal.truthparadigm.tv
https://cabal.truthparadigm.news
OUR DAILY OLDIES
OUR DAILY OLDIES
Turkish outlet Aydinlik has published an investigation using the SunCalc program to reportedly debunk the New York Times' report - which has been used to push accusations of atrocities in the Ukrainian city on to Moscow.
Here's what the probe found:
▪NYT claims Maxar satellite images were taken March 9-11, but Maxar's satellites were covering a different region on those dates
▪Image from March 19 was March 31 - due to evidence of a downpour that happened on the latter date
▪Investigators have apparently proven that another image allegedly taken on February 28, showing bodies on streets, was in fact from April 1, as shadows and SunCalc’s tech allow them to pinpoint the actual date and time
▪Russian troops left Bucha on March 30, confirmed by mayor on March 31 - however, there were no reports of bodies until April 3
https://www.australiannational....review.com/state-of-
The Ukrainian Air Force claimed that it destroyed as many as 11 Russian aerial assets. It claimed that in the process, it also prevented Moscow’s troops from crossing a river. If true, it would mean that Russian forces have failed to cross a river in Ukraine for the 2nd time. Meanwhile, Russian troops destroyed 23 houses in Donbas, said Ukrainian military, reported the Kyiv Independent. Ukrainian troops repelled 17 Russian attacks in the past 24 hours, the military said as per the report. Watch the full video for more.#Ukraine #UkraineAirForce #Russia #Donbas #Putin #NATO #Kyiv
www.anrnews.com
www.truthtube.video
www.truthbook.social
www.truthlook.com
www.truthgroup.social
Wow she is an absolute legend. Christine Andersen. Member of the European Parliament.
“Dear government, bring it on, let’s see what you’ve got”
https://www.australiannational....review.com/state-of-
Donald Trump Jr. makes a case for the importance of the Georgia Senate run-off race. #FoxNews #Tucker
Subscribe to Fox News! https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/
FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour all-encompassing news service delivering breaking news as well as political and business news. The number one network in cable, FNC has been the most-watched television news channel for 18 consecutive years. According to a 2020 Brand Keys Consumer Loyalty Engagement Index report, FOX News is the top brand in the country for morning and evening news coverage. A 2019 Suffolk University poll named FOX News as the most trusted source for television news or commentary, while a 2019 Brand Keys Emotion Engagement Analysis survey found that FOX News was the most trusted cable news brand. A 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey also found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News was the top-cited outlet. Owned by FOX Corporation, FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape, routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.
Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-the-five/
Special Report with Bret Baier: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-special-report/
The Story with Martha MacCallum: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-the-story-with-martha-maccallum/
Tucker Carlson Tonight: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-tucker-carlson-tonight/
Hannity: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-hannity/
The Ingraham Angle: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-the-ingraham-angle/
Fox News @ Night: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/longform-fox-news-night/
Follow Fox News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxnews/om/