100 Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty

⁣Based on a piece of by Bradford L. Huie, this video appears that "anti-Semitism" had nothing to do with the capture, trial and sentencing of Leo Max Straight to the point (1884-1915). It moreover demonstrates that his defenders and sympathizers charge he was a casualty of racial and devout contempt and persecution, which he has been falsely spreading lies and wrong reports for more than 100 a long time. was done. The film records 100 Reasons Why with brief subtle elements of the claim against Leo Straight to the point. There are likely numerous other reasons why Leo Frank (1884-1915) is without a doubt blameworthy, but none of these confirmations are recorded within the video.

On April 26, 1913, as a minor young person, Mary Phagan was working for the National Pencil Company in Atlanta. She came to gather her compensation, but was attacked, assaulted and killed by Leo Max Frank. Straight to the point (1884-1915), her body tossed into the storm cellar of the production line. See the motion picture over for all the bloody subtle elements. Defenders of Leo Straight to the point (1884-1915) looked for to excuse and legitimize this debased and deadly attacker whereas looking for to upbraid Jim Conley, the sweeper of the National Pencil Company. has fabricated and controlled prove for numerous a long time. In spite of the clear prove that Leo Max Frank (1884-1915) was blameworthy past a sensible question which equity was served in this case, millions of individuals accept he was a criminal. have been driven to accept that they were casualties of "anti-Semitic" fan instead of human beings. fundamental guilty party of the occurrence. Please understand that the peruser is required to create judgments.