Top videos
‘If you are firmly against the constitutional monarchy and believe that Australia should tomorrow become a republic despite improving nothing for struggling families, shouldn’t you decline the vice-regal patronage?’
Alan Jones is appalled by the hypocrisy of Australia’s republican
elites.
Watch ‘Alan Jones’ 8pm Monday to Thursday on ADH TV: https://watch.adh.tv/
____________________
📖 Read more from ADH TV here: https://adh.tv/
💬 Join in the conversation in the comments.
👍 Like this video if you enjoyed it and want to see more, it really helps us out
🔔 Subscribe to our channel and click the bell to watch our videos first
⏲️ Missed this episode live? Subscribe to ADH TV to be up to date with all our events:
https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup
🎤 Have your say and contact Alan Jones on alanjones@adh.tv
____________________
Australia's Leading Voice. News and analysis from experienced broadcasters with insightful interviews. Join the debate on the future direction of the country.
Check out ADH TV at - https://adh.tv
Subscribe to the ADH TV mailing list- https://adh.tv/subscribe/
Join ADH TV as a member for free at - https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup
Follow ADH TV on Socials
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adhtvaus Facebook: http://facebook.com/adhtvaus Instagram: http://instagram.com/adh_tv Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/....44ISFXCYFB6zbvOTAjok
‘Unless you have nations willing to stand up, to be strong, to be forthright about their own interests and to be unwilling to kowtow to demands from Chinese leadership, we will continue to find this kind of escalating behaviour.’
Distinguished Fellow of the Menzies Research Centre Amanda Stoker joins Fred Pawle.
Watch ‘Fred Pawle’ 9pm Monday on ADH TV: https://watch.adh.tv/
____________________
📖 Read more from ADH TV here: https://adh.tv/
💬 Join in the conversation in the comments.
👍 Like this video if you enjoyed it and want to see more, it really helps us out
🔔 Subscribe to our channel and click the bell to watch our videos first
⏲️ Missed this episode live? Subscribe to ADH TV to be up to date with all our events:
https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup
🎤 Have your say and contact Alan Jones on alanjones@adh.tv
____________________
Australia's Leading Voice. News and analysis from experienced broadcasters with insightful interviews. Join the debate on the future direction of the country.
Check out ADH TV at - https://adh.tv
Subscribe to the ADH TV mailing list- https://adh.tv/subscribe/
Join ADH TV as a member for free at - https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup
Follow ADH TV on Socials
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adhtvaus Facebook: http://facebook.com/adhtvaus Instagram: http://instagram.com/adh_tv Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/....44ISFXCYFB6zbvOTAjok
‘I’m struggling to find a better politician than Stuart Ayres.’
NSW Minister for Transport David Elliott discusses the ousting of Stuart Ayres with Alan Jones.
Watch ‘Alan Jones’ 8pm Monday to Thursday on ADH TV: https://watch.adh.tv/
____________________
📖 Read more from ADH TV here: https://adh.tv/
💬 Join in the conversation in the comments.
👍 Like this video if you enjoyed it and want to see more, it really helps us out
🔔 Subscribe to our channel and click the bell to watch our videos first
⏲️ Missed this episode live? Subscribe to ADH TV to be up to date with all our events:
https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup
🎤 Have your say and contact Alan Jones on alanjones@adh.tv
____________________
Australia's Leading Voice. News and analysis from experienced broadcasters with insightful interviews. Join the debate on the future direction of the country.
Check out ADH TV at - https://adh.tv
Subscribe to the ADH TV mailing list- https://adh.tv/subscribe/
Join ADH TV as a member for free at - https://watch.adh.tv/checkout/subscribe/signup
Follow ADH TV on Socials
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adhtvaus Facebook: http://facebook.com/adhtvaus Instagram: http://instagram.com/adh_tv Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/....44ISFXCYFB6zbvOTAjok
http://www.21stcenturyeducation.com.au Lou Harty sits down with CEO and Founder of 21st Century Education Jamie McIntyre. Part 2 http://www.21stcenturytv.com.au
In this segment, we discuss the Jesuits and Antichrist. And, we contrast the spirit of jesuitism and antichrist with that of the Holy Spirit.
HomeStudy Bundle
Jamie McIntyre CEO & Founder 21st Century Media, Education and Property Group of Companies. http://jamiemcintyre.com A bestselling author, serial entrepreneur, investor, business and life strategist, and marketing expert. Apart from his fast growing Digital Media Company he has grown 10 companies over $1 million in revenue and 2 over $10 million and one of his latest companies was just valued at over $100 million USD. He is also the founder of Australian National Review and launched a political party in Australia in 2013, 21st Century Australia and ran against the Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce.
http://21stcenturymedia.com.au
http://www.australiannationalreview.com/
http://21stCenturyaustralia.com.au
Jamie McIntyre is the founder of over 12 companies (employing at times as many as 100 staff and franchisees) that has turned over in excess of $60 million dollars annually. With reach in industries such as education, accounting, trading, real estate, rural companies (a group of farms in New England – Northern NSW where he grew up), recruitment, media, publishing,the 21st Century Group has grown to be one of largest financial education resource in Australia. He is both outspoken and controversial and is an advocate for defending those who often can't defend themselves. It has been claimed he has created more self made millionaires in Australia then any other individual via his ground breaking financial and business strategies he has modelled from some of the worlds leading entrepreneurs. His marketing advice and help to other companies via 21st Century Media has helped some companies generate as much as $100 million in extra sales within 120 days of his assistance.
He has written over 12 books with a Best Seller called "What I Didn't Learn At School But Wish I Had" and other titles including "Think and Grow Rich in the 21st Century" and 101 Lessons he learnt from Richard Branson.
Jamie has hosted and presented with some of the world’s most successful and respected entrepreneurs and business leaders including Sir Richard Branson, Arnold Schwarzenegger,Timothy Ferriss, Mark Bouris, Eddie McGuire, Danny Green, Randi Zuckerberg and many more at his Financial Education Summits which attract as many as 6000 attendees.
http://CompleteWealthEducation.com Jamie McIntyre discusses some simple yet very effective Stock Market Strategies such as Renting Shares at The 21st Century Academy. Please visit the link to get your FREE 3hr Wealth Creation DVD and 300 page E-Book right now.
Tecknat Barn Svenska:Lucky Luke TV Serie (2001-2003) DVDRIPPEN (Svenska) Hela Filmen (3D)
The Leo Frank case was convened in a temporary Atlanta courtroom on July 28, 1913, with 250 seats and 20 officers guarding the courtroom. The jurors, all white men and Atlanta residents, were chosen within 3 hours of the first morning of the trial. The defense used 18 of its 20 strikes without a cause while the prosecution used seven of the ten allowed. The twelve jurors were C.J. Bashard Pressman, I Hensley, Buggy Company, J. F. Higdon Building Contractor, Jefferies - Real Estate, Johenning Shipping Clerk, WF Medcalf Mailer, J.T. Osborne, Optician, Frederick V. L. Smith paying teller, D. Townsend paying teller, F.A. Windburn Railroad Claims agent, Al Weizby Cashier, M. S. Woodward - Cashier, King - Hardware. The Chief prosecutor, solicitor General Hugh A. Dorsey, was handsome and forceful, assisted by Frank Arthur Hooper and Edward A. Stevens. The defense was defended by Atlanta's two well known trial lawyers Special Assistant Solicitor Hooper described the State's case against Leo Frank, who was accused of premeditated rape of Mary Phagan. He alleged that Frank had seduced and taken liberties with other young factory girls and had made unsuccessful advances to Mary Phagan. Several surviving family members have said that Frank harassed Mary Phagan and that she went home and told her mother several former National Pencil Company employees have also alleged that they heard Frank sexually harass Mary Phagan.
The state argued that Frank was alone in the office, gave Mary Phagan her pay envelope, then followed Mary to the medal room and made sexual overtures to her. He then strangled her and gave Conley $2.50 and then $200, but later had Conley return the money. Hooper singled out the expected testimony of Monteen Stover, who he claimed would contradict Frank's contention that he had been in his office continuously from 12:00 p.m. Mrs. J. W. Coleman, the mother of Mary Phagan, testified that she last saw her daughter alive on April 26, 1913. A court officer drew forth a suitcase and lifted out the dress and shoes that Mary Phagan had worn when she last saw her.
Fanny Phagan Coleman identified the clothing of her murdered daughter by covering her eyes with a palm fan and sobbing. At that time, few women attended court trials except for those related to the victim or the defendant. Fanny Phagan Coleman and Ali May Phagan attended the trial, as well as Lucille Selig Frank, Frank's wife, and Mrs. Ray Frank, his mother. When asked for her thoughts by a reporter for the Atlanta Journal, Fanny Phagan Coleman said she would rather not talk about it. This silence caused the rest of the Phagan family not to speak of the trial for the next 70 years.
The narrator went out of the door and stayed until four minutes to six. When he returned, the doors were unlocked and the narrator went to Mr. Frank to change the slip. It took him twice as long as the other times he saw him fix it. When Mr. Frank put the tape in, the narrator punched and went on downstairs. Mr. Gantt came from across the street from the beer saloon and asked for a pair of old shoes to have fixed.
Mr. Frank ran into Gantt unexpectedly and asked him to help him find them. The narrator went up there with Mr. Gantt and found them in the shipping room. Mr. Frank phoned the narrator that night about an hour after he left. He asked if everything was all right and said goodbye. The narrator is a police officer who has been assigned to investigate the murder of a man named Gantt.
On Saturday night, the narrator goes to the building and finds a light on the street floor and a light in the basement. The narrator lit the light at 06:00 and made their rounds regularly every half hour. When 03:00 comes, the narrator discovers a body in the basement and calls up the police station. The narrator then carries the officers down where they find the body. The narrator then tries to get Mr. Frank, but he does not answer.
The most important details in this text are the events leading up to Newt's arrest. On Sunday morning, Newt saw Mr. Frank in the office and was handcuffed to a chair. On Tuesday night, April 29, Newt had a conversation with Mr. Frank at the station house and was handcuffed to a chair. When Mr. Frank came out of his office that Saturday, he was looking down and rubbing his hands. When defense attorney Rosser Cross examined Lee, the witness said that the locked double doors inside the entrance to the building were unlocked. When the prosecution called Sergeant L. S. Dobbs to the stand, he testified that he had never seen Mr. Frank rubbing his hands that way before.
The most important details in this text are the statements made by two witnesses to the murder of Mary Phagan. Albert McKnight, the husband of Frank's Cook, Minola McKnight, testified that between one and 02:00 on Memorial Day he was at the home of Mr. Frank to see his wife. On cross examination, McKnight stated that he saw Frank in the mirror in the corner and that he could not tell who was in the dining room without looking through the mirror. Ms. Helen Ferguson, a friend of the murdered girl, testified that she saw Mr. Frank Friday, April 25, about 07:00 in the evening and asked for Mary Phagan's money. Mr. Frank said he couldn't let her have it, and before he said anything else, she turned around and walked out.
Ms. Ferguson stated that she had gotten Mary's money before and did not remember if Mr. Schiff was in the office when she asked Frank for Mary's pay. By number three, medical experts had different contentions about the question of Mary Phagan's rape. All agreed that there had been a savage struggle after which the girl was strangled. According to the undertaker, there was a two and one half inch wound on the back of the victim's head, exposing part of the skull. The county physician, Dr. J. W. Hurt, testified that the head wound was induced by a blunt edged instrument and occurred before death.
Dr. H. F. Harris, the medical examiner, stated that Mary Phagan's vagina showed evidence of violence before death due to internal bleeding and the epithelium was pulled loose from the inner walls and detached in some places. Nowhere in the testimony can it be found that Mary Phagan was bitten on her breast. Pierre Fonpassen, who had studied the evidence and x rays of the Frank case in 1922, reported that he found x ray pictures showing the girl had been bitten on the left shoulder and neck before strangulation. Dr. Harris asserted that she had eaten her last meal of bread and cabbage approximately one half to three quarters of an hour before she died. C.
B. Dalton, the man whom Jim Conley alleged brought women with Leo Frank to the factory for immoral purposes, took the stand. He stated that he had visited the National Pencil Company three, four or five times and had been in the office of Leo M. Frank. He also mentioned Daisy Hopkins again, but did not remember the first time he was in Mr. Frank's office. The most important details in this text are that the narrator has been to Mr. Frank's office several times this year, and that he had Coca Cola, lemon and lime and beer in his office. On Redirect examination, Dalton stated that Frank had Coca Cola, lemon and lime and beer in his office.
He admitted that he had served time in the chain gang in 1894 for stealing, but claimed that it had been almost 20 years since he had been in trouble. Mel Stanford, who had worked for Frank for two years, testified that he swept the whole floor in the metal room on Friday, April 25. On Monday, the narrator found a spot that had some white hascalline over it on the second floor near the dressing room that wasn't there Friday.
The most important details in this text are the testimony of Jim Conley, a short, stocky black man who was a sweeper at the pencil factory. He testified that he had a conversation with Mr. Frank on Friday, 25 April, and that he wanted him to come to the pencil factory on Saturday morning at 830 to do some work on the second floor. He also testified that he always stayed on the first floor and watched for Mr. Frank while he and a young lady would be up on the second floor chatting. When young ladies would come there, he would sit down at the first floor and watch the door for him. On Thanksgiving Day, he watched for Mr. Frank.
On Thanksgiving Day, 1912, a tall, heavy built lady came to the Capital City Laundry to see her mother. The narrator and Mr. Frank met at the door and he asked the narrator to watch for him. The narrator went to the corner of Nelson and Forsyth Street and saw Mr. Frank as he passed by. The narrator was standing on the corner and Mr. Frank was coming up Forsyth Street towards Nelson Street. Mr. Frank asked the narrator to wait until he came back from Montague's factory.
The narrator was standing on the corner and Mr. Frank came out Nelson Street and down Forsyth Street towards the pencil factory. Mr. Frank and the narrator were passing a grocery store when a young man with a paper sack and his baby stood by the side of him. Mr. Frank said something to the narrator and hit up against the man's baby. Mr. Frank then stopped at Curtis's Drugstore and went into the soda fountain. When they got to the factory, Mr. Frank stopped the narrator at the door and put his hand on the door and turned the knob and said, "You see, you turn the knob just like this and there can't nobody come in from the outside".
Mr. Frank tells the narrator to push a box up against the trash barrel and sit on it. He then tells the narrator to shut the door and come upstairs to Mr. Darley's office to borrow some money. The narrator does as he is told, but Mr. Frank hits the narrator with a blow on his chest and tells them not to let Mr. Darley see them. The narrator refuses to let Mr. Darley see them.
The most important details in this text are that the narrator saw Mr. Darley, Miss Maddie Smith, Negro Draymond, Mr. Quinn, and Miss Mary Perkins. The narrator then went to Nelson and Forsyth Street and saw Mr. Darley, Miss Maddie Smith, Negro Draymond, Mr. Quinn, and Miss Mary Perkins. The narrator then went to Nelson and Forsyth Street and saw Mr. Darley, Miss Maddie Smith, Negro Draymond, Mr. Quinn, and Miss Mary Perkins. The narrator then went to Nelson and Forsyth Street and saw Mr. Darley, Miss Maddie Smith, Negro Draymond, Mr. Quinn, and Miss Mary Perkins. The narrator then went to Nelson and Forsyth Street and saw Mr. Darley, Miss Maddie Smith, Negro Draymond, Mr. Quinn, and Miss Mary Perkins.
The narrator then went to Nelson and Forsyth Street and saw Mr. Darley, Miss Maddie Smith The most important details in this text are that the narrator saw Miss Monte Stover, who had on a pair of tennis shoes and a raincoat, come in and stay there for a while. After she left, someone from the metal department came running back upstairs on their tiptoes. The narrator then heard Mr. Frank whistling and unlocked the door and went up the steps. Mr. Frank was standing at the top of the steps and shivering and trembling with a rope in his hands and a long, wide piece of cord. He had a little rope in his hands and a long, wide piece of cord in his hands, and his eyes were large and looked funny out of his eyes.
He had a cord in his hands just like this one cord. The narrator then went back to the office to see if the little girl's work had come, but she refused and the narrator struck her too hard and she fell and hit her head against something. The narrator has seen Mr. Frank in a position he hasn't seen any other man with children. He has seen him in the office two or three times before Thanksgiving, where a lady was sitting down in a chair with her clothes up to his knees. He has also seen him in the packing room with a young lady lying on the table.
When the narrator returns, they find the lady dead with a rope around her neck and a cloth tied around her neck. The narrator notices the clock and tells him it is four minutes to one. The narrator returns to the cotton box to find the girl dead. Mr. Frank tells the narrator to go back there and get a piece of cloth to put around her and bring her up. The narrator looks around the cotton box and gets a piece of cloth and goes back to the cotton box.
The girl is lying flat on her back and her hands are out. The narrator puts both of her hands down and rolls her up in the cloth and takes the cloth and tie her up and starts to pick her up.
The most important details in this text are that the protagonist is willing to help Mr. Frank because he is a white man and the superintendent of the school. Mr. Frank dictates the notes to the protagonist, who is willing to do anything to help him because he is a white man and his superintendent. The protagonist then takes a green piece of paper and tells Mr. Frank what to write on it. Mr. Frank then pulls out a roll of greenbacks and gives the protagonist $200 to buy a watchman for his wife. The protagonist then goes down to the basement and takes a lot of trash and burns the package in front of the furnace.
The protagonist is afraid to go down there by himself and Mr. Frank won't go down there with him. The most important details in this text are that Mr. Frank is a wealthy man in Brooklyn, and that the narrator is coming to get his money. He is going home to get dinner and will be back in about 40 minutes to fix the money. The narrator then goes to the beer saloon across the street and takes out two paper dollar bills and two silver quarters. He then buys a double header and drinks it.
The narrator then looks around at another colored fellow standing there and asks him if he wants a glass of beer. He says no. The most important details in this text are that the narrator was arrested on Thursday, May 1 and given tablets to write down what kind of boxes they had. Mr. Frank told the narrator what to write on the notes, and the girl's body was lying somewhere along number nine on the picture. The narrator dropped her somewhere along number seven and took an elevator on the second floor.
The box that Mr. Frank unlocked was right around the side of the elevator. The narrator was arrested on Thursday, May 1 and given tablets to write down what kind of boxes they had. Mr. Frank told the narrator what to write on the notes, and the girl's body was lying somewhere along number nine on the picture.
The most important details in this text are that the narrator was told to come back in about 40 minutes to do the burning, and that Mr. Frank went in the office and got the key to unlock the elevator. The notes were fixed up in Mr. Frank's private office, and the narrator never knew what happened to them. On Thanksgiving Day, the narrator saw a tall built lady in Mr. Frank's office, who had on a blue dress with white dots on it and a graying coat with kind of tails to it. On Thanksgiving Day, the narrator refused to write for the police the first time. Defense attorney Rosser spent three days attacking Conley's testimony, and Conley admitted to a number of arrests that had resulted in fines of nominal amounts for drunkenness or disorderly conduct and one sentence of 30 days for an altercation with a white man.
Rosser was able to show that Conley had a poor memory about everything except the murder and was repeatedly denounced by those who knew him as dirty, filthy, black, drunken, lying The most important details in this text are that Jim Conley, a native Mariettan reporter and journalist who covered the trial for the Atlanta Georgian, claimed it would have been impossible for Conley to fabricate the detailed account of what had happened and withstood the hours of cross examination. Conley may be telling the truth in the main, or he may be lying altogether, but he is one of the most remarkable Negroes that has ever been seen in this section of the country. As hour by hour the attorneys for the defense failed to entrap the Negro, the enormity of the evidence became apparent. Finally, the defense admitted that they had failed to entrap the Negro and asked that the evidence be stricken from the records. The Negro withstood the fire and Frank's attorneys are seeking to have the evidence expunged from the records.
The most important details in this text are that one state witness, Holloway, testified that he forgot to lock the elevator on Saturday when he left at 1145. He admitted that he had previously sworn twice that he did leave the elevator locked once in the affidavit he gave to Solicitor General Dorsey End. At the coroner's inquest, he stated that Frank got back from Montagues at about 11:00 and was in his office on the books. When he was leaving at 1145, he saw Corinthia Hall and Emma Clark coming towards the factory. He had seen blood spots on the floor, but he did not remember having seen the blood spots Barrett found.
He also said that cords like that used to strangle Mary Phagan could be found all over the place. He explained that he saw it a plank for Mr. Denham and Mr. White on the fourth floor and forgot about it when he remembered that he had forgotten to lock the elevator. Despite these few inconsistencies, he was forced to conclude that his family's evaluation of Leo Frank's culpability was accurate at that particular time. But he therefore shifted his focus to the defense's argument and made a pledge to himself to be fair in his evaluation of the facts.
The most important details in this text are the sentencing and aftermath of Leo Frank's trial. Judge Roan secretly brought Frank and the other principals together in the courtroom for the formal sentencing. The sentence read, "Leo M. Frank be taken from the bar of this court to the common jail of the county of Fulton and be safely there kept until his final execution in the manner fixed by law." On the 10th day of October 1913, the defendant was executed by the sheriff of Fulton County in private, witnessed only by the executing officer, a sufficient guard the relatives of such defendant and such clergyman and friends as he may desire, and that the defendant, between the hours of 10:00 A.m. and 02:00 p.m., be by the sheriff of Fulton County hanged by the neck until he shall be dead and may God have mercy on his soul." The trial had been the longest and most expensive trial in Georgia history, with the stenographic record being 1,080,060 words. The state star witness, Jim Conley, had been on the witness stand longer than any other witness in state history Judge Roan was Rosser's senior law partner from 1883 to 1886. The temper of the public mind was such that it invaded the courtroom and made itself manifest at every turn the jury made. This prejudice rendered any other verdict impossible. Frank's lawyers began to prepare their appeal immediately after the sentencing, including affidavits about the alleged prejudice towards Leo Frank of two members of the jury, A. H. Hensley and M. Johanning. The family of H. C. Lovenhard swore that on meeting Marcellus Johenning on the street before the trial he had told them, "I know he is guilty". Other points raised included the jurors being influenced by the crowd's demonstrations outside the courtroom and that the evidence did not support the verdict. Solicitor General Dorsey argued that the trial had been fair and countered with affidavits from eleven jurors who swore they did not hear or see demonstrations from crowds outside the courtroom. Both jurors who had been deemed prejudiced by the defense denied the charges. Rosser and Arnold made a final plea to Judge Roan, who denied the defense's motion for a new trial. The ruling was affirmed by the Georgia Supreme Court on February 17, 1914. Two judges, Beck and Fish, dissented on the question of admissibility of Jim Conley's testimony as to Frank's sexual perversion, but did not find the evidence in question sufficient cause to alter the guilty verdict. Not long after the Georgia Supreme Court decision, the Atlanta Journal reported that the state biologist who examined the body of Mary Phagan had concluded that the hair found on the lathe which the prosecution had cited as a major factor in its case, was not Mary Phagan's. The biologist told Solicitor General Dorsey that he did not depend on the biologist's testimony, as other witnesses in the case swore that the hair was that of Mary Phagan. The most important details in this text are that several prosecution witnesses retracted their original testimony, including Albert McKnight, Mrs. Nina Formby, George Epps, Jr., and Mary Phagan. Other witnesses conveyed that they had invented or lied about evidence due to the pressure brought by police detectives and solicitor Dorsey. In addition, the defense lawyers restudied the case, including Henry Alexander, who studied the murder notes allegedly written by Conley at Frank's direction, which were written on old carbon pads and had a dateline of September 19.
Mr. Alexander alleged that the words "night witch" in the note beside Mary Phagan's body, which had been interpreted to mean night watch or watchman by those who believed the notes had been written under the direction of a white man, actually referred to a negro folktale. On March 7, 1914, Frank was resentenced to die. A stay of execution was obtained on an extraordinary motion for a new trial based on newly found evidence. Three witnesses said the state's star witness, Jim Conley, was the killer. Annie Maud Carter in New Orleans said Conley told her he had called Mary Phagan over as she left Frank's office with her pay envelope, hit her over the head, and pushed her over a scuttle hole in the back of the building.
The most important details in this text are that Annie Maud Carter gave the Burns Agency some love letters from Conley which the Constitution said were so vile and vulgar that they couldn't be published in the newspaper. The defense contended that these love letters showed that Conley had perverted passion and lust. A black prisoner named Freeman told his story to the prison doctor, who reported that Conley was the killer. Conley's court appointed attorney, William Smith, thought Frank was innocent and made a public statement on October 2,114, saying that Conley's testimony was a cunning fabrication. This extraordinary revelation, which went against the lawyer client confidentiality privilege, was extolled by those who believed in Frank's innocence and castigated as being caused by bribery by those who believed him guilty.
William Smith revealed no new facts to support his beliefs, but instead tried to show how the already known facts had been misinterpreted due to Conley's lies. It has been said that Jim Conley confessed to William Smith, and a confession statement allegedly by Conley has been published in For One confessions of a Criminal Lawyer by Alan Lumpkin Henson. However, Walter Smith, William Smith's son, denied the authenticity of Conley's "confession", but brought to light facts which had been previously undisclosed regarding William Smith's relationship to his client. William Smith was reputed to be a very conscientious and ethical lawyer, and his prime obligation was to his client. He had been appointed to defend Conley by the court and he worked very closely with the prosecutor, Hugh Dorsey.
Smith believed in Frank's guilt and coached Jim Conley in how to react in the courtroom. He acted out the style and gyrations of Luther Rosser to Conley so well that when the actual trial was in session, Conley was not rattled in the least. Smith went to great lengths to defend Conley and to dig up facts against Frank. At some point in the course of the trial, Smith began to doubt that his client had been telling the truth and tried to get him the lightest sentence possible. Conley was convicted as an accessory to the fact and sentenced to one year on the chain gang. Smith felt morally and legally free to do some investigating and probing on his own.
William Smith believed that Leo Frank was innocent and that he himself was responsible for his conviction. He launched a thorough investigation which convinced him that Frank was innocent and that Conley was guilty. He went to Governor Slayton with his conclusions and his story was important in helping Slayton reach the decision to commute Frank's sentence. Smith's life was threatened and he and his family were forced to leave Georgia. In the last years of his life, Smith's vocal cords were paralyzed and he carried a pad of paper on which to write messages in the hospital room.
On May 8, 1914, superior court Judge Ben H.Hill denied the defense motion for a new trial, which was affirmed unanimously by the Georgia Supreme Court. Jewish organizations and groups raised the issue of religious prejudice before Leo Frank's trial ended. The appeals for funds for Leo Frank's defense were made through mailing, circulars and newspaper advertisements throughout the country and particularly in the north. This resulted in a virtual reenactment of the Civil War between Northern and southern newspapers, which increased in intensity as the trial progressed. The New York Times and Colliers Weekly called for a new trial, mass rallies were held in United States cities, and thousands of letters, petitions and telegrams were sent to Governor Slayton and soon to be Governor Nat Harris.
However, the conviction of Frank became an article of faith for Southerners and the belief in Frank's innocence became the litmus test in the Jewish community of Atlanta for antisemitism. On March 10, 1914, the Atlanta Journal editorially called for a new trial, saying that if Frank is found guilty after a fair trial, he should be hanged and his death without a fair trial and legal conviction will amount to judicial murder. The most important details in this text are that the court, lawyers, and jury were not able to decide impartially and without fear the guilt or innocence of an accused man. The atmosphere of the courtroom was charged with an electric current of indignation, and the streets were filled with an angry, determined crowd ready to seize the defendant if the jury had found him not guilty. When the jury returned the guilty verdict, Frank was not in the courtroom, but at the Fulton Tower.
Cheers for the prosecuting counsel were irrepressible in the courtroom throughout the trial, and on the streets, unseemly demonstrations and condemnation of Frank were heard by the judge and jury. The judge was powerless to prevent these outbursts in the courtroom and the police were unable to control the crowd outside. The Fifth Regiment of the National Guard was kept under arms throughout the night, ready to rush on a moment's warning to the protection of the defendant. The press of the city united in an earnest request to the presiding judge to not permit the verdict of the jury to be received on Saturday, as it was known that a verdict of acquittal would cause a riot. Frank was tried and convicted, but the evidence on which he was convicted is not clear.
The outbursts in the courtroom and the police were unable to control the crowds outside were events that all three newspapers had not printed during the trial. The Journal remained quiet about these events for a year.
The Atlanta Georgian, which was silent during the trial, later called for a new trial. Tom Watson, who had been defeated for vice president of the United States on the populace ticket in 1896, immediately launched a scathing attack against those criticizing the results of the Frank case. He referred to Frank as being a Jew pervert and said he denied justice to the family of a poor factory girl. Burns offered a $1000 reward to anyone who could provide evidence that Frank was a sexual pervert, but no one came forward. Burns also brought forth evidence given to him by the reverend C.B.Ragsdale, pastor of the Atlanta Baptist Church, who told the story of overhearing two black men, one of whom confessed to killing a little girl at the factory the other day. Later, Ragsdale repudiated his statement. A Burns operative, Mr. Toby, had been retained by members of the Phagan family and their neighbors to investigate the murder and discover the murderer. After several weeks of investigating, Toby resigned and announced that he had concluded that Frank was the guilty party. Dorsey alleged that Burns tried to bribe witnesses to give false testimony.
The hearing on extraordinary motion for a new trial was based on the absence of Frank at the reception of the verdict. On December 7, 1914, a writ of error was taken to the United States Supreme Court and was denied. Frank was sentenced to be hanged on January 22, 1915. Frank's attorneys then filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus to the United States Supreme Court on April 19, 1915. The two justices who dissented were Oliver Wendell Holmes and Charles Evans Hughes.
They dissented on the basis that a lower court hearing should have been held to determine the validity of the defense. The most important details in this text are that Governor John Slayton was the only hope left for Frank, and his attorneys appealed to him for a commutation of his sentence from hanging to life imprisonment. Slayton referred this request to the state Prison Commission and asked them to pass their recommendation to the governor. Meanwhile, Frank's attorneys filed an appeal for a clemency hearing before the three man Georgia Prison Commission. The hearing date was scheduled for May 31, 1915.
On May 31, 1915, out of state and in state delegations appeared to plead for Frank's life. They had submitted voluminous documents to convince the commission an error had been made, including a letter by presiding Judge Leonard Roan written shortly before his death on March 23, 1915. Some members of Roan's family doubted the authenticity of the letter for years, but Dr. Wallace E. Brown, owner of the Berkshire Hills Sanatorium, attested to Roan's rational mental state. Brown also stated that he has been a resident of North Adams, Massachusetts, practically all his life, and is now serving his third term as mayor of the city of North Adams.
On Sunday, November 20, 1914, Judge L.S. Roan of Atlanta, Georgia dictated a letter to Mrs. Wallace E.Brown of North Adams, Massachusetts, asking for executive clemency in the punishment of Leo M. Frank. The letter was written by Judge Roan of Atlanta, Georgia, to Mrs. Wallace E.Brown, who was then Miss Jane Deity. The letter expressed the deponent's uncertainty of Frank's guilt due to the character of the Negro Conley's testimony. The letter also stated that the chief magistrate of the state should exert every effort in ascertaining the truth, and that the execution of any person whose guilt has not been satisfactorily proven to the constituted authorities is too horrible to contemplate. The deponent heard Judge Roan dictate the letter before copied and saw him read and sign the name.
Judge Roan had stated to Deponent that he was not convinced of Frank's guilt and that if executive clemency were asked for Frank, he intended to recommend commutation. The next morning, some 50 determined looking men from Cobb County marched into the Prison Commission office and demanded the hearing be reopened. They included former governor Joseph M. Brown and Herbert Clay, solicitor of the Blue Ridge Circuit. Clay spoke for hours against Commutation arguing that Georgia would be dishonored for all time if Frank were spared for his alleged abominable crime. The commission reopened the hearing and the commissioners listened intently and said nothing.
At the end of the reopening, they issued a statement that they would offer their recommendation to Governor Slayton in a week by a two to one vote. On June 1915, the commissioners refused to recommend commutation to Governor Slayton, leaving it up to the governor.
The State Board of Pardons and Paroles received a formal request for a posthumous pardon for Leo Frank in October 1982. The complaint was filed by the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Commission, and the Atlanta Jewish League, and was chaired by a panel of attorneys chaired by Atlanta immigration attorney Dale N. Schwartz. The Chamber of Commerce hopes to investigate the case with minimal outside pressure and publicity, and the plaintiffs have been working to file a pardon petition since Alonzo Mann gave his testimony. Dale Schwartz has publicly stated that the essence of seeking Leo Frank's pardon is to seek a formal rejection of anti-Semitism and bigotry, and to remove the obtrusive element to Georgia's history. Applicants are seeking a pardon based on additional legal concerns rather than the legality of Leo Frank's trial and conviction. The pardon effort, an AntiDefamation League staffer later stated, was not simply a matter of one person, not just the case of Leo Frank.
An official wrote the League's national The pardon effort for Leo Frank in the United States has been criticized for minimizing potential offense to blacks, repudiating prejudice against blacks and Jews, and reflecting Georgia's past as it reflected on the personal identity and regional pride of Georgians to do justice. The Atlanta Black Jewish Coalition has declared that they must seize this opportunity and the petition for pardon concluded, "Judgment, justice ye shall pursue." The pardon effort has been criticized for minimizing potential offense to blacks, repudiating prejudice against blacks and Jews, and reflecting Georgia's past as it reflected upon the personal identity and regional pride of Georgians to do justice. The petition for pardon concluded, "Judgment, justice ye shall pursue." Attorney Edgar Neely argued that the Georgia system of justice in 1913 impugned the reputation of its lawyers in general and particularly Frank's counsel. The leaders of the pardon effort responded at length, including outlining the new evidence of Alonzo Mann. Mobley Hall, chairman of the Amnesty and Parole Board at the time, weighed Mr Neely's claims.
He had four legal ways to acquit Leo Frank. Complexity by courts beginning with a governor's statement declaring Leo Frank not guilty, an order of the Georgia House of Representatives and/or Senate declaring Leo Frank not guilty, and an ad hoc motion for a retrial and pardon by the Georgia Commission procedure. Forgiveness and slogans. Governor Joseph Harris, District Attorney Louis Slayton, and the Georgia Senate all expressed sympathy for Leo Frank's efforts to acquit him and recommended that the Board of Pardons and Paroles seek a pardon. Petitioners began to think that a pardon would best meet the further legal purpose of Frank's acquittal and would be considered final by the public. Dale Schwartz pointed out that the public now understands the amnesty process as an exoneration, especially when it involves acquittal of the applicant. Petitioners also suggested that the court's ruling would make it appear that the Jewish community manipulated fellow judges.
The goal at the time was a pardon from the Amnesty and Parole Board. In a 1984 interview, Dale Schwartz told the editors of Israel Today that Georgia not only grants forgiveness for past crimes, but rather defendants are the type to seek state forgiveness for wrongful convictions. said he would grant a posthumous pardon.
The most important detail in this document is that of the petitioner for posthumous pardon in the Leo Frank case. The petitioners were personally involved in and affected by the incident, and their father suggested they contact the rest of the Phagan family. Their assessment of the family's opinion was correct, so the petitioners sent a letter to the parole board asking to allow the Phagan family to appear at the parole board hearing on the Leo Frank case. Last fall, the parole board received a formal written pardon request and was required to do so by order of the Georgia Senate dated March 26, 1982. The pardon request may be based on Alonzo Mann's 1982 testimony, but the Board is not limited to its consideration. Applicants are advised that the parole board does not plan to hold oral testimony hearings against anyone. The Phagans have requested that all information be provided in writing. The Commission is likely to make a decision later this year and has expressed its determination to base its decisions on the facts and evidence it desires to investigate the incident with minimal external pressure or public disclosure. are doing. Mr. Moore's letter confirmed the family's intuition that there would be some political involvement in the board, as well as their decision to consider posthumous clemency. On February 14, 1983, the Phagan family responded by letter to the board of directors. The letter said the alleged turmoil in court during the proceedings did not threaten the fairness of the proceedings or provide sufficient grounds to overturn the verdict. Trier's judge hearing the motion for retrial was right in believing that the jury whose impartiality was contested was competent. An important detail in this document is that Leo Frank was sentenced to death, which was commuted by Governor John Marshall Slayton. Governor Slayton said the jury's verdict would not be challenged if the commutation was granted, but the murder conviction would be commuted. Passed the state on the specified date. In August 1915, he was kidnapped by a mob from Mirageville State Facility and taken to Cobb County, where he was lynched. Alonzo Mann, 14, a witness in the Frank trial, received death threats and was not asked specific questions to prove Frank's innocence. Frank was competently represented by a council of great skill and experience. Alonzo Mann came forward to clear his conscience before his death, claiming that Leo Frank was not guilty of the murder of Mary Phagan, but provided no evidence to contradict Leo M. Frank's verdict. issued a statement swearing no. How long has he worked in the pencil factory? The Senate has asked the State Board of Amnesty and Parole to investigate the Leo Frank case. If the evidence points to Leo Frank's innocence, the Board should seriously consider granting Leo Frank a posthumous pardon. With no new evidence presented in 70 years, Mobley-Hall said he needed to fully prove his innocence with full evidence. The lawsuit is refiled every three to five years and will never be resolved.
The Phagan family demanded a copy of the applicant's application and all evidence presented, as well as information regarding future applications in the Leo M. Frank Mary Phagan case. On April 26, 1983, an article in the Atlanta Journal and Constitution reported that a pardon was being sought for Leo Frank. Atlanta Journal and Constitutional contributor Ron Mertz reported that the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Commission, and the Atlanta Jewish League have asked parolees and parole boards to reclaim Frank. . Celis Moore confirmed to reporters that her application for a posthumous pardon is under consideration, and this is the first time a posthumous pardon has been considered in Georgia. The petition contains 300 pages, including an affidavit from Alonzo Mann, who was Frank's clerk at the time of the murder, and a two-and-a-half-hour videotape of Mann drafting an affidavit protesting Frank's innocence. It contained evidence of The myth that formed around Leo Franck is based on Alonzo Mann's The Leo Franck Myth, which was attributed to Jim Conley as a confession, and secret evidence allegedly provided by John Slayton in 1915. formed public opinion about him long before he was born. Judge Arthur Pole hinted that Frank's innocence would one day come to light. The author is one of the few people who know that Frank was convicted and innocent of the lynching charges. After the trial was over and the Supreme Court upheld the conviction, he learned who murdered Mary Phagan, but that information could not be revealed as long as the particular person was alive. and arrived. Laws on this subject may or may not be wise laws, but some people think they are not wise laws.
The most important details in this text are that the file to which he refers may have contained a confession obtained by Conley's own counsel, and that Alonzo Mann's testimony proved that Jim Conley, the state's chief witness against Frank, had lied on two counts. First, since Mann indicated Mary Phagan was alive as she was carried down, it contradicted Conley's statement that she was dead when he saw her on the second floor. The petitioners for the pardon were pinning their hopes on Alonzo Mann's testimony, which proved that Jim Conley, the state's chief witness against Frank, had lied on two counts first, since Mann indicated Mary Phagan was alive as she was carried down, contradicting Conley's statement that she was dead when he saw her on the second floor. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution felt that the case was compelling and that the Board of Pardons and Paroles should move quickly to clear Leo Frank's name and the enduring blot on the conscience of Georgia. Sherry Frank, Southeast area director of the American Jewish Committee, told the Journal that the pardon would white from the books the life sentence given Frank, but also clear him outright of guilt in Mary Phagan's killing. Anti-Defamation League Southeast Regional Director Stuart Lewinlove said he was seeking a full exoneration. Governor Joe Frank Harris has announced his intention to approve the pardon if recommended by the Board of Pardons and Parole. When the posthumous amnesty initiative became public, it itself provoked an anti-Semitic response.
On September 3, 1983, the New Order of Knights, a fringe clan group, held a march and rally in Marietta, Georgia, featuring signs reading no pardon for the Jew murderer Leo Frank. This was part of a conspiracy by a group called Christian Friends of Mary Phagan, who wrote to the pardon board to accuse and hopefully prove Christians guilty of prejudice, bigotry and antisemitism. Others felt the same way as the petitioners did, and the Atlanta Constitution had the power to right a great wrong and do a great good. Among those who extorted the board to pardon Leo Frank were a minister in Tennessee who felt that pardon would bring a sense of reassurance to many of the citizens who have been hurt and still suffer due to the prejudicial trial to which he was subjected many years ago, and a member of the Christian Council of Metropolitan Atlanta who viewed a pardon as a way to repudiate the twin evils of prejudice and mob rule. The Phagan family felt the same way, as they had known about the application for the posthumous par The narrator took a step to ensure that the next generation of the Phagan family would not be victimized by a newshungry press. They contacted Ron Mertz, who wrote the article about Mary Phagan, and told him of his mistake. He asked if the narrator would consider an article or series of articles about himself. A few months later, the narrator contacted the staff in Tennessee, telling him that he wanted to meet Alonzo Mann and asking if he could make arrangements. On July 19, the narrator met Alonzo Mann, Jerry Thompson, and Robert Sherborne at the narrator's home. The narrator was concerned that they were doing the right thing, but when he met Mr. Mann he knew they were doing the right thing. They spend an hour going through the narrator's huge scrapbook of the murder of Mary Phagan. The most important detail of this text is that of the relationship between the narrator and the witnesses to the murder of Mary Phagan. The narrator reads to the witness an article from Tennessee about a visit to the grave of the narrator's great-aunt, and the two become friends. The narrator then asks the witness to make more formal statements, such as where he was born, how long he said he lived in Atlanta, how long he worked for Mr. Frank, and whether he had met Mary Phagan. started asking questions. Finally, the narrator asked how long he had been working for Mr. Frank and whether he had seen her with her eyes. Finally, the narrator asked how long she had been working for Mr. Frank and if he had ever seen her. The narrator has been working at the pencil factory for several months, contradicting her father's view that Mr. Mann was only there for a week. The narrator noticed that Mr. Mann seemed tired and her voice was weakening. He recently had heart surgery and now wears a pacemaker. The narrator is 28 years old and has a heart condition. The narrator said that after meeting Jim Conley, he went home and told his mother what he had seen. When investigators arrived at her home, she asked when she had left.
The most important detail in the document is Mr. Mann's story and his attempt to get Leo Frank pardoned. Mr. Mann faced the challenge of publicizing and telling the world what he thought he had seen. He asked the author to tell the commission again that Leo Frank deserved a pardon, but the author felt it was impossible. On July 20th, the author received Thunderbolt #290 from the current Ku Klux Klan Society. He opposed any person or organization wishing to honor Little Mary Phagan, but he opposed any individual or organization using Little Mary Phagan's death to their own detriment. He wrote to the Anti-Defamation League in Atlanta and received a letter from Stuart Lewengrab that said: The KKK has reproduced Judge Randall Evans Jr.'s testimony from the May 15, 1983 Augusta Chronicle Herald on Leo Frank's appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the conviction, but Justices Fish and Beck disagreed on the admission of certain evidence. Frank then filed an extraordinary petition for a new trial with Supreme Court Justice Hill, which was denied, and on June 6, 1914, the Georgia Supreme Court unanimously upheld the decision. Frank then refiled his motion to reverse the judge's ruling against Hill, but the motion was denied. According to filings, two impartial Fulton County Superior Court judges, 12 impartial Fulton County jurors, and six impartial Georgia Supreme Court judges all confirmed that Leo Frank was legally tried and convicted. agreed to be sentenced to death by hanging. The Jewish community across the United States tried to defend Frank for being convicted because he was Jewish. An important detail of this document is that Governor John M. Slayton, on the last day of his presidency, commuted Leo Frank's sentence to life imprisonment, and accordingly applied the appropriate judicial policies established by the Fulton County Superior Court and the Supreme Court. It means that it was done. Stopped and overturned by Georgia. Much of the anger of Jewish communities across the country was directed at Thomas E. Kennedy. Thompson's Watson accused Watson of writing inflammatory articles to the Jeffersonian that contributed to Frank's conviction. The evidence was overwhelming, and Governor Slayton commuted Frank's sentence to life imprisonment, overturning and overturning due process established by the Fulton County Superior Court and the Georgia Supreme Court.
Much of the ire of Jewish communities across the country was directed at Thompson's Thomas E. Watson, who accused Watson of writing inflammatory articles in the Jeffersonian that contributed to Frank's conviction. A key detail in the document is that a new witness, Alonzo Mann, was first discovered and said he saw a black man with the body of Mary Phagan in the basement of the factory building. The archives department even wrote in one of its publications that the new evidence seemed to prove Frank's innocence. However, the authors point out that this is not new evidence and that during the trial it was revealed that Jim Conley carried the body to the basement. This correspondence is now part of the Archives Department. The suggestion that the governor or parole board can pardon the dead is utterly absurd.
The Constitution of Georgia provides that the legislative, judicial and executive powers shall remain separate and distinct. The Executive Department has no power to reverse, change, or wipe out a decision by the courts, albeit while the prisoner is in life, he may be pardoned, but a deceased party cannot be a party to legal proceedings. Pardon must be granted the principle upon his application or be evidenced by ratification of the application by his acceptance of it. It is too late now for any consideration to be given a pardon for Leo Frank, as pardon can only be granted to a person in life, not to a dead person. The author and his father were interested in the statements made by Judge Randall Evans, who had been told that the Phagan family were the only ones who had objected to a posthumous pardon for Leo Frank.
They felt that the judge made some important and relevant points, and they had to verify the statements concerning the pardon to find out whether the consideration of the application by the Board was indeed illegal. Mike Wing of the Pardons and Paroles Board was supportive of the author's request for a copy of the governing rules and consideration for a pardon. He learned that the application for pardon filed was indeed illegal and that there were only two instances in which a pardon could be granted according to the rules of the Board. On July 22, the author went to Nashville to meet the entire Tennesseeean staff, including John Segenthaler, the president and publisher, Jerry Thompson, Robert Sherbourne, and Sandra Roberts. On the wall of John Seagenthaler's office was a picture of the jury that convicted Leo Frank, which will remain there until a pardon is granted.
Mr. Segantholer said the staff was very cordial, courteous, and helpful to the author, and they shared their opinions, both pro and con, and remained strong in them. Mr. Segenthaler and the narrator discussed the possibility of a posthumous pardon, but Mr. Segenthaler felt that no complete proof of evidence could be submitted. The narrator realized that their opinions were as strong as their father's and that a posthumous pardon should not be granted unless there was complete proof of evidence. Later that evening, the staff allowed the narrator to go through Sandra's research files and determine what materials they would like to photocopy. Alonzo Mann called the narrator on July 26 to let him know he had received a letter from a Phagan and thought the narrator would be the most appropriate person to have it.
Frank Ritter of the Tennessean called the narrator on July 28 to ask him to let him know when they made a decision about going public. He added that no matter what, he supported the narrator.
Sandra Roberts called the narrator to a meeting with Bill Gronick, president of the American Jewish Committee, and Miles Alexander, an attorney, on August 3. They had concerns about the Phagan family and wanted the narrator to share their views. The narrator told them they didn't condemn or object to the Phagan family, but they objected to a pardon unless complete proof of evidence could be substantiated. They wanted to know how the narrator would deal with the situation if they were Leo Frank's great niece. On August 8, 1983, the narrator and her father met with Mike Wing of the Board of Pardons and Paroles.
The narrator drove to their parents' home in Decatur and they agreed to ride Marta, the rapid transit system in Atlanta. The narrator recollected stories and spoke of childhood memories, and the narrator expressed proud feelings for his father. The narrator was as proud of the narrator as he was of the narrator. Celis Moore and Mike Wing met at 02:00 p.m. and discussed the idea of a posthumous pardon for Leo Frank.
Moore informed Mike that the Phagan family was opposed to the granting of a posthumous pardon because there was no absolute proof of Frank's innocence. He felt that Alonzo Mann's affidavit offered no proof, but was merely Mann's opinion that Frank did not commit the murder. Moore also pointed out that those who were seeking the pardon chose to impose today's judicial standards for a trial that occurred in 1913. Moore felt that any person or organization could and should have the right to pay little Mary Phagan tribute as long as it wasn't for their own prejudicial purposes. Mike told them that Judge Randall Evans, Jr., who was quoted in the Thunderbolt, was not a member of the Klan and felt that the courts of Georgia should be upheld in dealing with the Leo Frank case.
Edgar Neely, the attorney who also opposed the pardon, was also present. The most important details in this text are the events leading up to the application for a posthumous pardon for Leo Frank. On August 9, 1983, Edgar Neely wrote a letter to the board stating his opposition to the pardon. On August 20, 1983, the author decided to acknowledge their name and legacy to the press. On September 1, the Marietta Daily Journal reported that the Pardons and Paroles Board should reconsider the case, and Governor Harris was quoted as saying that the case deserves reconsideration. Governor Harris did not say whether he would recommend a posthumous pardon for Frank.
Dr. Ku Klux Klan's new leader, Edward Fields of Marietta, has planned a KKK march from Marietta Square to Mary Phagan's grave on Saturday, September 3rd. About 100 to 150 members of the family were expected to attend a service in memory of Mary Phagan. Marietta Mayor Bob Fronoy announced that a service for those opposed to the KKK rally would be held at First Baptist Church at 148 Church Street in Marietta. On Sept. 5, Tennessee state officials Frank Ritter, Sandra Roberts, and photographer Pat Casey arrived at the author's home, grilled hot dogs and hamburgers outside, and began the interview. . The author's father did most of the talking, and the rest of the family listened intently. When he read the inscription, he was overwhelmed with emotion and cried. His tears made the author cry. The story of Tennessee's "Little Mary Phagan Can't Be Forgotten" is written honestly, concisely, and with a sensitive feeling towards the author. On September 7, Darwood McAllister of the Atlanta Journal wrote an editorial statement on the Frank case. He considered the Klan march a futile attempt to ensure the survival of the Klan, and used the posthumous pardon of Leo Frank as an excuse. He also said that 10 years after the murder, journalists of the Atlantic Constitution found new evidence pointing to Frank's innocence. But prominent Atlanta Jews persuaded newspapers to withhold the story, fearing it would have new repercussions. The author and his father contacted the journal's Ron Mertz and told him they were ready to go public in Georgia. On September 14, the Atlanta Journal published a letter from Randall Evans, Jr. in response to McAllister's editorial opinion. The article reminded readers that Georgia law has no authority to pardon the dead. Justice Evans succinctly expressed his views in response to Darwood McAllister's statement. The story of Ron Mertz, published in the Atlanta Journal on September 22, 1983, represented a step forward for the Phagan family, but one that prevented them from going backwards. On September 20, 783, the Board of Directors allowed the Phagan family to speak on the Board, including Mobley Hall Chairman Mamie Reese, James Morris, Michael Wing, and Wayne Snow, Jr. was The Board of Directors did not know of the existence of the Phagans until they received a report from Mike Wing. They were concerned about the feelings of the Phagan family and felt they could share that with the entire board.
James Phagan and Mary Phagan are direct descendants of Little Mary Phagan. They came to share their views and opinions on the posthumous pardon request for Leo Frank, who was convicted of the murder of Little Mary Phagan. Due to the large number of articles, editorials and opinions published by both the newspaper and television stations, and external pressure from the Senate, the newspaper allowed an interview with Atlanta Journal contributor Ron Mertz. They are concerned that they will be granted a posthumous pardon, and if they can find evidence in court to prove Leo Frank's innocence in the murder of Little Mary Phagan, they will be willing to come forward and let the world know.
The foremost critical subtle elements in this content are the occasions encompassing the lynching of Leo Straight to the point in 1983. On December 22, 1983, the Board of Pardons and Paroles reported its choice, which weighed intensely on the author's intellect within the taking after months. Amid that time, the Modern York Times, Washington Post and US magazine sent correspondents to meet the creator and her father, and one of the columnists told the creator through and through that their granddad and father had been lying which Leo Straight to the point was guiltless. On December 23, 1983, the author's father went to the state capitol building where the board was to report its choice. When they arrived at Bernard's guardians domestic, Bernard's mother couldn't hold up to tell the creator that the ask for a after death exculpate for Leo Straight to the point had been denied.
The author's father had cleared out Atlanta that morning for Michigan to spend Christmas with Bernard's family, and when they arrived, Bernard's mother couldn't hold up to tell the creator that the ask for a after death exculpate for Leo Straight to the point had been denied. The Leo Straight to the point case was a riddle 70 a long time after it started. The board had organized an examination staff beneath the direction of Chairman Celis Moore and displayed prove such as daily paper accounts, the trial brief, books and letters, at the side brief outlines. Alonzo Mann's declaration was the primary to be assessed, but the board felt it only cast question on Jim Conley's declaration. The board set around to recreate something that happened 70 a long time back, but all the performing artists were expired but Alonzo Mann.
No other witnesses showed up, no one uncovered up to this time mystery fabric, and there was no concrete prove of a confession by Jim Conley. In spite of the entry of time, the Leo Straight to the point case remained a riddle. The foremost vital points of interest in this content are that Leo M. Straight to the point was found blameworthy in Fulton Province Prevalent Court of the kill of Mary Phagan on Admirable 25. The Board of Pardons and Paroles announced that the lynching of Leo Straight to the point and the truth that no one was brought to equity for that wrongdoing could be a recolor upon the state of Georgia which allowing a after death acquit cannot remove. The Board moreover announced that the lynching of Leo Straight to the point and the truth that no one was brought to equity for that wrongdoing may be a recolor upon the state of Georgia which allowing a after death acquit cannot expel.
The Board moreover announced that the lynching of Leo Frank and the truth that no one was brought to equity for that wrongdoing may be a recolor upon the state of Georgia which allowing a after death acquit cannot evacuate. Leo M. Straight to the point was sentenced to passing by hanging for nearly two a long time and was requested to the most noteworthy levels within the state and government court framework. On June 21, 915, senator John M. Slayton commuted the sentence of passing to life detainment. On Eminent 17, 1915, a gather of men took Leo M. Straight to the point by drive from the state jail at Millageville, transported him to Cobb District, Georgia, and lynched him. On January 4, 1983, the Board gotten an application from the AntiDefamation Association of Bennet Brith, the American Jewish Committee, and the Atlanta Jewish Federation, Incorporated, asking a full acquit excusing Leo M. Frank straight to the point of blame of the offense of killing someone (first degree murder).
The court granted the petitioners a full pardon, and the only basis for exoneration of the murders for which Leo M. Frank was convicted was conclusive evidence that Frank was innocent. recommended. The burden of proof on this is on the applicant.
The information submitted to the parole board in this matter is considerable. The affidavit of Alonzo Mann, dated March 4, 1982, is accompanied by numerous other documents submitted in support of the pardon. Mann made statements to journalists Jerry Thompson and Robert Sherbourne, which were videotaped and recorded by a court reporter in the presence of representatives of the parole board. Mann's major point was that upon reentering the front door of the National Pencil Company building on April 26, 1913, he saw the limp form of a young girl in the arms of Jim Conley on the first floor. Governor Slayton concluded that the elevator was not used to transport the body of Mary Phagan to the basement.
Briefs have been submitted in opposition to the pardon, citing evidence and information to support that view, and letters have been received reflecting opinions in support of and in opposition to the pardon. The brief of trial evidence obtained from the Supreme Court of Georgia contains all the testimony given at the trial, which is the foundation upon which most arguments on both sides of the issue are based. The lynching of Leo Frank and the fact that no one was brought to justice for that crime is a stain upon the State of Georgia which, granting a posthumous pardon cannot remove. 70 years have passed since the crime was committed, and no principals or witnesses, with the exception of Alonzo Mann, are still living. After an exhaustive review and many hours of deliberation, it is impossible to decide conclusively the guilt or innocence of Leo M. Frank.
For the Board to grant such a pardon, the innocence of the subject must be shown conclusively. Therefore, the Board hereby denies the application for a posthumous pardon for Leo M. Frank. Dale Schwartz had declared Alonzo Mann's testimony credible, but the board members doubted its value as concrete evidence. Even if Jim Conley had lied, the board argued, it did not mean that Frank was innocent. The pardon application for Leo Frank was motivated by extra legal goals, but it also spoke of the pardon process as within the structure of the judicial process.
The application cited federal court cases to justify standing to seek a pardon. The petitioners, in attempting to repudiate antisemitism, represented their attempt as a legal effort to repudiate the libel against the Atlanta Jewish community and injury. The conclusion of the pardon application read, "The public good will be served, a historic injustice will be corrected, a 70 year libel against the Jewish community of Georgia will finally be set aside, and the soul of Leo Frank will at last rest in peace." The evidence in Man's testimony and the collective weight of people believed in Frank's innocence in 1915 provided the claim for Frank's innocence. However, the leaders of the pardon effort tied the extra legal justifications for the pardon and their procedural mindset very tightly together, leading to claims of innocence that were not easily justified. Dale Schwartz publicly responded to the passage in the board's statement which said that Frank's innocence was not proved beyond any doubt, yet the pardon application itself stated that Leo Frank was innocent to a mathematical certainty.
The response to the board's denial of pardon was immediate and vociferous, with the Atlanta Constitution running an editorial cartoon showing three men labeled as board members packing away a crate. Television and radio broadcasters took up the cry, as did the three groups who had filed for the posthumous pardon. Board members, convinced of the sincerity of their investigation and decision, also proclaimed themselves in shock. Hundreds of letters criticizing the decision came into the board weekly, but the author felt that the board made a fair decision from the start.
The information submitted to the parole board in this matter is important. Alonzo Mann's March 4, 1982 affidavit is accompanied by a number of other documents submitted in support of the pardon. Mr. Mann made statements to journalists Jerry Thompson and Robert Sherborne, which were videotaped by court reporters in the presence of parole board officials. Mann's point is that when he re-entered the front door of the National Pencil Company building on April 26, 1913, he saw a limp little girl on the ground floor in Jim Conley's arms. Met. Governor Slayton concluded that the elevator was not used to transport Mary Phagan's body to the basement. Petitions were filed against the amnesty, citing evidence and information to support its views, and letters were received expressing opinions in favor of and against the amnesty. Evidence obtained from the Georgia Supreme Court includes all statements made during the trial and is the basis for most of the discussion on both sides of the issue. The lynching of Leo Frank and the fact that no one was brought to justice for his crimes is a stain on Georgia that his posthumous pardon will not remove. Seventy years have passed since the incident occurred, and with the exception of Alonzo Mann, there are no main culprits or witnesses alive. After extensive research and hours of deliberation, it is impossible to conclusively determine the guilt or innocence of Leo M. Justin. Frank.
In order for a court to grant such a pardon, the innocence of those involved must be conclusively proven. Accordingly, the Commission hereby denies the claim for posthumous pardon against Leo M. Frank. While Dale Schwartz said Alonzo Mann's testimony was credible, board members questioned its value as concrete evidence. The board argued that even if Jim Conley lied, it didn't mean Frank was innocent. Leo Franck's pardon request was motivated by an additional legal purpose, but it also referred to the pardon process as part of the structure of the court process.
The lawsuit cited federal court cases to justify eligibility for amnesty. Petitioners presented their attempt to reject anti-Semitism as a legal attempt to reject defamation and infringement of Atlanta's Jewish community. The conclusion of the pardon petition is that "the public interest will be realized, historical injustice will be righted, 70 years of defamation against Georgia's Jewish community will finally be shelved, and Leo Frank's soul will finally rest." was written. The combined weight of human testimony evidence and those who believed Frank's innocence in 1915 supported Frank's claims of innocence. However, the leaders of the amnesty effort have so closely associated additional legal justifications and procedural ideas for pardons that they have resulted in claims of innocence that are not easily substantiated. Dale Schwartz publicly reacted to passages in the commission's statement that Frank's innocence had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but the pardon petition itself was written by Leo Frank with mathematical certainty. said he was innocent.
The response to the board's pardon refusal was immediate and vocal, with the Atlanta Constitution running an editorial cartoon depicting three men nominated for board membership packing a box. Television and radio stations responded to the call, as did the three groups that had sought posthumous amnesty.
The information submitted to the parole board in this matter is important. Alonzo Mann's March 4, 1982 affidavit is accompanied by a number of other documents submitted in support of the pardon. Mr. Mann made statements to journalists Jerry Thompson and Robert Sherborne, which were videotaped by court reporters in the presence of parole board officials. Mann's point is that when he re-entered the front door of the National Pencil Company building on April 26, 1913, he saw a limp little girl on the ground floor in Jim Conley's arms. Met. Governor Slayton concluded that the elevator was not used to transport Mary Phagan's body to the basement. Petitions were filed against the amnesty, citing evidence and information to support its views, and letters were received expressing opinions in favor of and against the amnesty. Evidence obtained from the Georgia Supreme Court includes all statements made during the trial and is the basis for most of the arguments on both sides of the issue. The lynching of Leo Frank and the fact that no one was brought to justice for his crimes is a stain on Georgia that his posthumous pardon will not remove. Seventy years have passed since the incident, and with the exception of Alonzo Mann, none of the clients or witnesses have survived. After extensive research and hours of deliberation, it is impossible to conclusively determine the guilt or innocence of Leo M. Justin. Frank.
In order for a court to grant such a pardon, the innocence of those involved must be conclusively proven. Accordingly, the Commission hereby denies the claim for posthumous pardon against Leo M. Frank. While Dale Schwartz said Alonzo Mann's testimony was credible, board members questioned its value as concrete evidence. The board argued that even if Jim Conley lied, it didn't mean Frank was innocent. Leo Frank's pardon request was motivated by an additional legal purpose, but it also touched on the pardon process as part of the structure of the court process.
The lawsuit cited federal court cases to justify eligibility for amnesty. Petitioners presented their attempt to reject anti-Semitism as a legal attempt to reject defamation and infringement of Atlanta's Jewish community. The pardon petition concludes: "The common good is done, historic injustices are righted, 70 years of defamation against Georgia's Jewish community is finally shelved, and Leo Frank's soul is finally at rest. Let's go" was written. The combined weight of human testimony evidence and those who believed Frank's innocence in 1915 supported Frank's claims of innocence. However, the leaders of the amnesty effort have so closely associated additional legal justifications and procedural ideas for pardons that they have resulted in claims of innocence that are not easily substantiated. Dale Schwartz publicly responded to passages in the House Opinion that said Frank's innocence had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but the pardon petition itself held that Leo Frank was mathematically innocent The information submitted to the parole board in this matter is important. Alonzo Mann's March 4, 1982 affidavit is accompanied by a number of other documents submitted in support of the pardon. Mr. Mann made statements to journalists Jerry Thompson and Robert Sherborne, which were videotaped by court reporters in the presence of parole board officials. Mann's point is that when he re-entered the front door of the National Pencil Company building on April 26, 1913, he saw a limp little girl on the ground floor in Jim Conley's arms. Met. Governor Slayton concluded that the elevator was not used to transport Mary Phagan's body to the basement. Petitions were filed against the amnesty, citing evidence and information to support its views, and letters were received expressing opinions in favor of and against the amnesty. Evidence obtained from the Georgia Supreme Court includes all statements made during the trial and is the basis for most of the arguments on both sides of the issue. The lynching of Leo Frank and the fact that no one was brought to justice for his crimes is a stain on Georgia that his posthumous pardon will not remove. Seventy years have passed since the incident, and with the exception of Alonzo Mann, none of the clients or witnesses have survived. After extensive research and hours of deliberation, it is impossible to conclusively determine the guilt or innocence of Leo M. Justin. Frank.
In order for a court to grant such a pardon, the innocence of those involved must be conclusively proven. Accordingly, the Commission hereby denies the claim for posthumous pardon against Leo M. Frank. While Dale Schwartz said Alonzo Mann's testimony was credible, board members questioned its value as concrete evidence. The board argued that even if Jim Conley lied, it didn't mean Frank was innocent. Leo Frank's pardon request was motivated by an additional legal purpose, but it also touched on the pardon process as part of the structure of the court process.
The lawsuit cited federal court cases to justify eligibility for amnesty. Petitioners presented their attempt to reject anti-Semitism as a legal attempt to reject defamation and infringement of Atlanta's Jewish community. The pardon petition concludes: "The common good is done, historic injustices are righted, 70 years of defamation against Georgia's Jewish community is finally shelved, and Leo Frank's soul is finally at rest. Let's go" was written. The combined weight of human testimony evidence and those who believed Frank's innocence in 1915 supported Frank's claims of innocence. However, the leaders of the amnesty effort have so closely associated additional legal justifications and procedural ideas for pardons that they have resulted in claims of innocence that are not easily substantiated. Dale Schwartz publicly responded to passages in the House Opinion that said Frank's innocence had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but the pardon petition itself held that Leo Frank was innocent with an absolute certainty.
The response to the Board's refusal to pardon was immediate and vocal, with the Atlanta Constitution running an editorial cartoon depicting three men nominated for Board membership packing a box. Television and radio stations responded to the call, as did the three groups that had sought posthumous amnesty. Board members who were convinced of the seriousness of the investigation and decision were also shocked. Although I received hundreds of letters every week criticizing the decision, I felt that the Board had made a fair decision from the beginning.
The court said complete and fresh evidence had to be presented before a posthumous pardon could be granted. Alonzo Mann's testimony was not new evidence and did not prove that Leo Frank did not murder young Mary Phagan. The Atlanta Journal said the state of Georgia refused to clear Leo Frank's name, which is not true. There are plenty of people in Georgia who have no relationship with Mary Phagan, are not fanatics, and find Leo Frank guilty. The author's father petitioned the local television station to refute Zeit's editorial statement regarding the amnesty, but was denied. That phase is over for the rest of the world, not the author's family. The denial of a posthumous pardon was only a temporary respite, and the horror show continued.
The testimony of night watchman Newt Lee, who had discovered 13-year-old Mary's body in the basement of the pencil factory during his nightly rounds in the early morning hours of April 27, 1913, provides the most crucial details of Leo Frank's trial for the murder of Mary Phagan. The entirety of Lee's testimony has been preserved as part of the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence, all of which was supported by data that was deemed reliable by both the prosecution and the defense during the appeals process.
The majority of information about the Frank trial that was then currently available is stridently pro-Frank and derivative, which means that it largely consists of cherry-picked paraphrases and interpretations of what witnesses said and what reporters and investigators learned during those crucial days. The Mercury will start by presenting the entire testimony obtained during Newt Lee's direct and cross examination in order to fill in some of these purposeful omissions.
Before the trial started, there had been an attempt to frame Lee using a bloody shirt that had been planted, but subsequent events showed that Lee was completely innocent, and by the time of the trial, he was not even the slightest bit under suspicion, so he had no known reason to lie. Newt Lee was working as a night watchman at the National Pencil Factory on April 26, 1913. He had to return on Friday, April 25, at 5:00 a.m. after spending three weeks there. He was paid off Friday night, and the front door wasn't locked on Saturday. Mr. Frank hands him the keys at noon on Saturdays when he leaves for work and gives them back at 8 am on Mondays. On Saturday, he used his keys to unlock the locked front door.
He carried a bag of bananas up the stairs and, as usual, stood to the left of the desk. Rubbing his hands together, Mr. Frank approached, apologizing for calling him so soon. They should go out and have a good time, the narrator tells Mr. Frank. They are instructed to stay for an hour and a half and return at 6:00. The narrator leaves and stays until four minutes and six seconds later. The doors are unlocked when they return.
It took Mr. Frank twice as long as it did the other times to change the flip. He fumbled with inserting the lever, which the narrator is holding for him. The narrator punches Mr. Frank and continues downstairs as he inserts the tape. Mary Phagan has a friend named Mr. Gantt who used to work in a pencil factory. He approached Newt from across the street from the beer bar and requests to have a pair of worn-out shoes repaired upstairs. When Mr. Frank exits the room, he unexpectedly collides with Gantt. Frank identifies the old shoes as being tans and black when Gantt says he has a pair upstairs. Gantt and Newt ascend there, where they discover them in the shipping room. About an hour after leaving that night, Mr. Frank called Newt. It's his first call to him on a Saturday night or at all, and he doesn't inquire about Gantt. Just beyond the building entrance, there is a light on the street level. In order for the officers to see in when they pass by, Mr. Frank instructed the narrator to keep the basement light burning bright. The narrator always arrived an hour earlier on Saturdays and released the subject an hour later. On April 26, the light was flickering as dimly as it could go, much like a lightning bug.
When the narrator arrived on Saturday, the elevator doors on the street floor and office floor were locked. The body was located in the basement when 03:00 rolled around. He went to the restroom and checked the dustbin from behind the door to see how it was. He went there after picking up a lantern and saw something that made him think that some of the boys had left it there to frighten him. He eventually moved a small distance in its direction, looked at what it was, and left. The fact that the narrator called the police station and discovered Mr. Frank's body is the most crucial information in this audiobook.
When the police arrived, the narrator was still trying to get Mr. Frank on the phone. The narrator witnessed Mr. Frank entering the office on a Sunday morning, but he just looked at the ground and avoided eye contact. A conversation between the narrator and Mr. Frank took place at the station house on Tuesday, April 29, after which they bound him to a chair. When the narrator enquired as to whether Mr. Frank thought the narrator was responsible for the crime, he responded that he thought the narrator knew something about it. That Saturday, Mr. Frank left his office looking down and rubbing his hands. Before cross-examination, the narrator had never observed him rubbing his hands in that manner.
Mr. Frank jumped back and held his head down when he saw Mr. Gantt, according to the narrator's testimony at the coroner's inquest. He hid the fact that he had given one of Mr. Gantt's shoes to one of the boys from the coroner. The narrator typically arrives at the factory on Saturdays at 12:00, but this time Mr. Frank instructed them to leave by 4:00. The coroner was also informed by the narrator that he was looking down when he left his office and that there was a place for him to sleep within the structure. The elevator and the basement were both immediately accessible when the narrator entered the factory through the front door.
By the time the narrator returned on Saturday around 6:00, all of the doors had been unlocked. The factory is a huge, sprawling, old place, and the doors are never shut, which are the two most crucial details in this text. All of the shutters and blinds were shut that day, with the exception of two or three on the first floor, which were shut that evening. Two clocks, one punching to 100 and the other to 200, are present. Mr. Gantt and Mr. Frank had a problem, and Mr. Frank had instructed Mr. Gantt to keep Lee away from the area. Lee punched both of them in response. Lee continued upstairs while Mr. Gantt entered the beer saloon.
The narrator left the factory at 06:30 and passes the engine room, the women's locker room, and the basement every half hour. Mr. Frank instructed the narrator to check the building every half hour and watch for the trash can and the back door. The narrator is close enough to the door to see that it is closed and that there is light in front of the door, but no light between the case and the door. When the police arrived, the narrator is close to the door and sees that it is closed, with a light ahead. When the narrator found the body, the back door closed.
The first time the narrator descended into the basement is at 7:00 AM. The narrator searched for a body in a closet on the second floor, one on the third, and one on the fourth. When they saw the body, they went back into the closet to see if there was a fire in the trash can. The docent is 20 or 25 feet from the hole in the skylight and has to walk at least 10 feet to see if there is a fire in the dumpster. If they don't find the body, the narrator walks on, but the closest they get to the body is about 6 feet. The narrator is sitting in a closet when they see a white woman lying on her back with her face to one side. When the police arrived they said it was a white girl. The narrator reported to police that it was a white female. Frank had asked the narrator to call the police and fire department if anything serious happened. The narrator at the coroner's hearing said that Mr. Frank played the tape longer this time than before.
The narrator held the handle and must move it back and forth to apply the tape. Police found a note in the basement that said a tall, dark, slim black man had tried to bury it overnight. When the cops read the note, the narrator said that they must have tried to force it upon him. When Mr. Frank came out and rubbed his hands, he went from the inner office to the outer office and from there to the clock. Unless they found the body, the narrator did not go down into the cellar at night to the cauldron. The officers were constantly talking to the narrator, who hardly slept day or night.
The most important detail in this audiobook is Frank's trial. Jim Conley's testimony hurt Frank so much that neither the coroner's jury nor the grand jury that indicted Frank heard a word from Jim Conley. Frank's decision to make Newt Lee come in early and then let him go for two hours is questionable because Frank is absolutely determined that Newt can't take a break during his two-hour break. Frank's first and only phone call to Lee came at 7:30 p.m. On the night of the murder, he was also suspicious of asking if everything was "okay". Frank is very nervous about 6 hours after the murder, Mary Phagan's body is hidden in the basement, when he sees Mary's friend Gant, he cuts his hands and jumps in fright, in theory he can search for her, but he cannot function normally. The most important detail in this article is that Frank had previously worked with Isa without assistance for almost five years and that he checked Lee's time card the day after the murder and declared that Every Stroke was set correctly. When the bloody shirt is later found at Lee's house, Frank contradicts himself and claims that more punches were missed. The defense team is still trying to plant the idea that Lee may have been involved in the crime, but that theory was greatly weakened when Lee told the court he hadn't even met Conley until a month after the murder on a Sunday in April 1913. 27., in prison. On April 28, Leo Frank changed his story, suggesting that Newt Lee missed three or four shots.
When police searched Newt Lee's home, they found a bloody shirt at the bottom of his incinerator. The defense subjected Lee to harsh cross-examination, misunderstandings, insults and accusations, but they could not grasp any contradictions in him. Sergeant L Mr Dobbs told the jury how he found Mary Phagan's body lying face down, left side on the ground and right side up. Her face was bumpy, swollen and black. The rope was a noose around the neck, embedded in the flesh, and the tongue was stuck out. Detective Constable John Stearns was called to the witness stand to testify that he went to the premises of the Pencil Company between 05.00 and 06.00 on April 27. By the back door he found a clamp that looked like it had been pushed out of a pipe against a tree. He called Mr. Frank and asked him to come to the factory immediately. He made him play Boots Rogers. Mr. Frank looked tense and shaky. Starnes was guarded when talking to him on the phone.
Another important fact in this passage is that the narrator, Mr. Frank, Mr. Black, and the narrator's father, Mr. Geesling, go to the company and see a dead person lying in a room to the right of a large room. Geesling turns on the lamp above her head and the narrator walks to the opposite side of the body with the door to the left.
Mister Geesling grabs the dead girl's face and turns it towards the narrator. The narrator then sees Mr. Geesling walk through the door into a closet where Mr. Quisling or someone is sleeping. The most important detail in this passage is that Mr. Quisling turns the dead girl's head to the narrator, and he can tell if she worked in the factory by looking at his pay book.
Another important fact is that Mr. Hendricks, the night watchman at the pencil factory, showed the writer how to set the clock to less than five minutes, and that the rope used to strangle Mary Phagan on the floor was in the pencil factory at the opposite corner of the dressing room. On the morning of Monday, April 28, the writer saw bloodstains about a foot and a half or two feet long at the end of the dressing room, and he picked up some of the bloodstains. He also found a nail 50 feet away on that side of the metal room, opposite the second-floor elevator, which appeared to have blood on it, and two places near the back door that appeared to have bloody fingerprints. The author does not know when Frank was arrested.
To add further significance to the matter is that Lee was called to the station building on Monday, where he worked in the pencil factory. He never thought of running away, the stairs from the office building to the third floor, when he just climbed up, the door was locked. He heard Booth Rogers testify at the coroner's inquest and prosecutors testify twice.
He couldn't say what his conversation was with Mr. Frank's phone message, but it was a casual conversation. He saw stains on the floor, the rope was cut into pieces, and the little girl had no purse, no flowers, no ribbon on her hat. He spoke carefully about what he had said to Mr. Frank on the phone and handed the tree to Chief Langford. The most important detail in this text is the testimony of W.W. Booth Rogers, who had accompanied the officers to the coroner's inquest. Mister. Rogers recalled seeing Mr. Rosser during the inquest but never heard him say anything during the entire hearing. The most important fact that Starnes highlights is the contrast between Leo Frank's extreme tension and Newt Lee's relative calm. W.W. Boot Rogers also took the oath of allegiance to the state and is associated with Judge Geraldo's court.
On the evening of Saturday, April 26, he was at the station building, and then proceeded to the premises of the National Pencil Company. He heard Mr. Starnes on the phone asking if something had happened at the factory. Mr. Black was with him and asked if something had happened at the factory. Mr. Black said: Mr. Frank, better get dressed and let's go to the factory and see what's going on. Mr. and Mrs. Frank dream of hearing a phone call at 3:00 in the morning, and Mr. Black suggests whiskey. Mr. Frank was nervous and asked questions quickly, but allowed enough time between questions to get answers. They got into the back seat and one of them asked Mr. Frank if he knew a little girl named Mary Phagan. Frank said he couldn't tell if she worked in the factory until he looked at the payroll.
The most important details in this passage are that Newt Lee was arrested and that Mr. Frank looked exactly the same at the police building as when he first met him. He walked quickly, and as soon as the car door opened, he easily jumped off Mr. Daly's lap and headed up the stairs. We didn't know if the girl was white until we wiped the dirt from the child's face and pulled a small piece from her sock. When we got to his home, he asked his wife to bring a tie and tie. At that time, Ms. Frank was talking to Mr. Daly, and Mr. Frank was putting on a tie at the front desk.
An important detail in this recording showed that Mr. Selig had suffered from indigestion the night before and drank all the wine in the house, so Mr. Frank agreed to go with them to the funeral home. When they got into the car they told him it was Mary Phagan, and he could see if she was employed by reading his book. When Mr. Geesling turned the face of the young lady, no one could see the face unless they entered the room. Mr. Geesling sees Mr. Black and Mr. Frank more clearly than the narrator because their backs are turned and Mr. Geesling stares at them directly over his body. When they returned to the factory, the elevator they were riding on made a loud noise and automatically stopped when it reached the bottom.
The narrator lies face down with his arms folded. The main details in this text are that the girl has a bruise on the left side of her head, dried blood in her hair, one eye has turned black, and some small scratches on her face. When they first went down to the basement, they found no shoes, no hats, no umbrellas in the elevator shaft. Upon exiting the elevator, there was quite a lot of excrement that smelled like the excrement of normal healthy people. The girl's hair was that of the white girl, and the body was not in the undertaker, which was visible from the door. Diversion tests revealed that the body was not in the undertaker, which was visible from the door. Re-examination revealed that the body was not in the morgue, which was visible from the door.
The most important detail in this text is the testimony of Detective John R. Black, who knew Frank before Phagan's murder. He pointed out that Frank was not naturally nervous or upset and knew that Frank had changed his mind about Newt Lee's late timing and the discovery of the bloody shirt. He also knows that Frank changed his mind because of the no hits on Newt Lee's time sheet and the circumstances surrounding the discovery of the bloody shirt. Black was easily confused and confused by the defense's rapid cross-examination, damaging his credibility.
John R. Black, a police officer, met Mr. Starnes and Mr. Frank on the phone. He goes to Mr. Frank's House with Boots Rogers in a bathrobe and Mrs. Frank. Frank was tense as he grabbed his collar and asked what happened. He wondered if something had happened to the pencil factory and if the Night's Watch had reported it. When they got into the car, Mr. Frank asked if he knew Mary Phagan and said she was found dead in the basement of the pencil factory.
Frank said he didn't know any girl named Mary Phagan and knew very few employees. He suggested to Mr. Rogers that they be conducted by the firm's undertaker. Mr. Frank looked at the girl and stepped aside.
He thought he had paid her on Saturday, but he could tell by looking at his cash book at the pencil factory.
The following Monday and Tuesday, Frank said, the clock was struck incorrectly three times. On Monday morning, Frank and the National Pencil Co. attorneys Rosser and Mr. Haas came to the police station.
On Tuesday evening Mr. Scott and Mr. Scott that Mr. Frank got to talk to Newt Lee, who thought a lot of the black man and said he had always found him trustworthy and honest. They went into the room and were alone for about five to ten minutes. Frank said Mr. Gantt was there Saturday night and he asked Newt Lee to let him get the shoes but to follow him because he knew the area around the office. After this conversation, Gantt was arrested and Frank didn't mind talking to Newt Lee.
After his release on Monday, he looked very happy on Tuesday night. Frank said at the station that at 06:00 nobody was in the factory except Newt Lee, who should know more since he was in charge of checking the factory every 30 minutes. Cross-examination revealed that Mr Rosser came to the police station between 8am and 8.30am on Monday, recalling that he did not swear Rosser was there. The narrator overhears Mr. Rosser telling Mr. Frank to make a statement without even meeting. They wanted to speak to Frank privately during the coroner's inquest and Rosser was not present. Mr. Frank answered each question and the narrator spoke to him twice. The narrator did not tell Mr. Frank about the murder while they were in the house, but he did as soon as he got into the car. The narrator wants to observe Mr. Frank to see how he feels about the murder. Mr. Frank did not go up to tie his tie, but Mrs. Frank did. Frank brought him his collar and tie, and he put his coat and hat there. The narrator has no idea where he got his coat and waistcoat or what tie or collar he is wearing.
The most important detail in this article is that Mr. Frank was at the police station on Monday from 8:30 a.m. until approx. the writer was there, Sheriff Lanford was there, but no one noticed the blood. Mister. Frank was at the police station from Monday at 830 to approx. 11:30, when Mr. Haas asked them to go to Mr. Frank's house and look at his worn and washed clothes from the week before. A bloody shirt was found at the bottom of a laundry tub at Newt Lee's home around 9 a.m. Tuesday morning. Mr. Frank had told the author that he didn't think Newt Lee had told him everything he knew about the murder. The most important details in this play are the details of Black's misunderstanding and his confusion about when Frank suggested that the house be searched. Dorsey's theory is that Frank wanted his own house to be searched because that would of course lead to Lee's house being searched as well and the bloody shirt being found planted. James Gantt, the man who had given Frank such a fright when he appeared at the factory on Saturday night, was next on the witness stand. Gantt still has a lot to say, including being fired by Frank or being friends with Mary Phagan.
J.M. Gantt, shipping clerk of the National Pencil Company, was fired by Mr. Frank on April 7 due to a possible shortfall in wages. He had known Mary Phagan since she was a little girl, but had not seen her until she went to work in the factory. After being discharged from the hospital, he returned to the factory and Mr. Frank saw him twice. To the best of Mr. Frank's knowledge, $2 is reported missing from the payroll. Mr. Frank told him he had the best office staff ever. On April 26, he saw Newt Lee sitting in front of the factory and remembered that he had left a pair of shoes there. Seeing her, he took a step back as if to return. Mr. Frank came out and asked the narrator if he wanted to go shopping for a pair of shoes with him. The narrator said yes, but he asked if Newt Lee was okay. He then asks the narrator if he wants to go with him.
The most important detail in this article is the testimony of Harry Scott, Pinkerton's agent, who was brought into the case at the behest of the National Pencil Company and paid for by forces friendly to Frank.Harry Scott's testimony is especially credible because his agency was brought into the case at the special request of the National Pencil Company and paid for by forces friendly to Frank. Mr. Frank has just returned from the police station and it seems that Detective Blake suspects that he did it. He described his actions on Saturday 26 April which included arriving at the factory at 08:00 in the morning, going to Montague Brothers for postage and returning to the factory at around 11:00 and 12:00.
Mrs Arthur White's wife, Mrs. White, asked permission to go upstairs to her husband, and Mary Phagan entered the factory at 12.10 in order take away her salary. When she reached the front door of the office, which opened into the hall, she asked if the medal had arrived. Mr. Frank said he didn't know, and as Mary Phagan walked down the aisle he heard voices but couldn't tell if it was a man or a girl. Mr. Frank went up to the fourth floor and asked Wyatt and Denim when they could finish the job. He informed Mrs.White that he was closing the plant and that she had better leave. As she went outside, Ms. White said she saw a black man on the street floor of the building. 13:10 Mr. Opens the factory and goes home for lunch. He comes back to the factory at 15:00 and did some financial work.
At 6:00 after returning to the factory, Li asked Mr. Frank, if everything was okay. Mr. Frank said yes and Lee went about his business. When he reaches the street entrance, he finds Lee talking to Gant, Frank's former accountant who was fired for the theft. Mr. About 18:25 Frank arrived home. The most important detail in this passage is that Mr. Frank and Daly take the narrator on a tour of the factory and show them what the police have found. They went to the metal room on the second floor where they saw some stains that were supposed to be bloodstains and a car that was supposed to have hair on it. Then they went through the skylight, down the stairs, and into the cellar, where all was revealed. Mr. Frank's behavior at the time seemed completely natural, with no signs of strain. His eyes were large and piercing, and his face was slightly pale.
The main information in this article is from a conversation between Mr. Pearson and Mr. Herbert J. Haas on the Pinkerton Agency's position on the matter. Mr. Pearson stated that he had previously heard voices at 12:00 a.m. before Mary Phagan entered and that Gantt knew Mary Phagan well. Pearson also said Gantt was watching him to see if any of Frank's attorneys had said anything about suppressing evidence related to the murder. Mister. Pearson then went to the office of Herbert J. Haas in the Fourth National Bank Building and spoke with him about the Pinkerton Agency's position on the matter.
Mister. Haas said he wanted us to submit a report to him first before it goes out to the public to let them know what evidence we have gathered. Mr. Pearson then saw an area near the girls' locker room on the floor of the office where fresh chips were cut and painted white. On the evening of Tuesday, April 29, Mr. Black with Mr. Frank. Mr. Black said to Mr. Frank that he didn't think Newt Lee had told everything he knew.
Mr. Black asked Mr. Frank, if he would act as employer and employee, go into the room and try to get more out of the niggers than they can get. Mr. Frank quickly agreed and they were alone for about ten minutes. When they entered the room, Lee wasn't done talking to Frank and said, "It's hard for me to be chained to this chair all the time." They then asked Mr. Frank if he had received anything from black people and he said no.
Mr. Frank was very nervous at that time, twitching and turning in the chair, one leg curled up one by one, and he did not know where to put his hands. He took a deep breath, a deep breath, sighed and hesitated. His eyes were about the same as they are now. The interview between Lee and Frank took place shortly after midnight on Wednesday, April 30. On Monday afternoon, Franks said the first hit Lee slid in at 6:33 p.m. His last stroke was at 3:00 a.m. Sunday morning. At approximately 11:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 29, Mr. Black and the narrator Mr. Frank in custody. On Saturday, May 3, the narrator went to Frank's cell in the prison and asked if he had been to the office. He carefully searched the area around the elevator and the radiators and returned there, but found nothing.
Question? Yes. Superintendent H. B. Pierce and Narrator with Herbert J. The Board's position on this matter was discussed at the Haas meeting. Mister. Haas said whoever was involved, they wanted to know who the killer was. The narrator did not report this to the police. The most important detail in this passage is that the speaker reported the motive for their meeting, that Mr. Haas wanted them to find the killer, even if it was Frank. Mister. Haas told Mr Pearson he would have liked them to give him the evidence report before handing it over to the police. The spokesmen also testified at the coroner's inquest about the conversations they had with Mr. Frank, they did not give details of Mr. Frank's actions when he left home in the morning, arrived at the factory, went to Montague Brothers and returned to the factory. The representative also failed to prove that Gantt was familiar with the little girl, as that would have been negligent. The representative spoke for the National Pencil Company, not Mr. Frank personally.
The details of the speaker's interview with Mr. Frank are also brought up. Speakers said they heard Lee's last words and did not record in their notes that Mary Phagan was familiar with Gantt charts. The spokesman also said they did not show the coroner that a white substance had been smeared over the alleged bloodstains. The spokesman also said they reported it to the police before reporting it to Mr Haas or Mr Montagu Redirect.
Take the exam. The spokesman also said there was a lot of dust on the stairs leading from the basement to the upper floors and the dust appeared to be undisturbed. Finally, the speaker announced that they had been working the entire case with Detective Blake and that they were aware of his every move. A payroll envelope for the club and parts company was found on the first floor of the factory where African-American janitor Jim Conley was sitting the day he was murdered by a rogue agent of Pinkerton, the whistleblower in the Scott bombing. He revealed that Frank had told Scott that Gant knew Mary Phagan very well and that he knew her well and was close. Mary Phagan's colleague, Montena Stover, was not hostile to Frank and thought highly of him, but she was certain that he was definitely not in her office between noon and the day of Mary Phagan's death around 12:45 p.m
Montena Stover was sworn in to the State and said she worked for the National Pencil Company until April 26, 1913, when she was at the factory at five past twelve. She had no animosity towards Frank and held him in high esteem, but she was sure that he was completely absent from his office from noon until the day of Mary Phagan's death at 12:45 p,m. The narrator is 14 years old and works on the fourth floor of a factory. They had never been to Mr. Frank's office before, and the door to the metal room was sometimes open and sometimes closed. They don't pay in the office, so they have to go to a small window to open the diversion control. R.P. Barrett, a mechanic for the Pencil Company, found what appeared to be Mary's hair on a factory lathe in the center of the room, and bloodstains that had been hastily covered with grease were found nearby.
At the end of work on Friday, the hair and stains were still gone. The doors in the metal room are sometimes closed and sometimes open, and are closed when the plant is not in operation. The most important detail in this article is that R.P. On the morning of Monday, April 28, Barrett, a mechanic for the National Pencil Company, discovered an unusual place in the west end of the locker room on the second floor of the pencil factory. The place was about four or five inches in diameter, and the little blob followed them from behind, and there were six or eight people. It looks like a white substance has been applied. There was a broom on the floor, leaning against the wall, but apart from being dirty, there were no signs of use. Mel Stanford sees hair on the handle of an L-shaped table lathe.
On the morning of Monday, April 28, R.P. Barrett, a machinist at the National Pencil Company, noticed an unusual place in the dressing room on the second floor of the pencil factory. There was lube nearby and at the end of Friday's work there was none. He promised to stay there for eight weeks. The writer found a blood point on the floor from 630 to 07:00 on Monday 630 and 07:00, which seems to have been applied with a thick diet. They also found pieces of hair on a lathe handle, a gas jet that the girls sometimes used to curl their hair, and a payment envelope under Mary Phagan's car.
The narrator has never gone for blood before until Miss Jefferson arrives and says she knows Mary was murdered in the metal department. A few minutes later, the narrator finds the hair and left some work behind when he left the car on Friday. Mrs G.W. Jefferson testified that she had found bloodstains on Barrett and that they covered an area "as big as a fan." dr. Claude Smith, a chemist of the city of Atlanta, stated that although he had seen only four or five corpuscles on the wood shavings, his analysis proved them to be blood. In 1913, DNA evidence did not exist, so it was impossible to test the hair or blood to determine if it came from Mary Phagan. After Barrett left the stands, janitor Mel Stanford confirmed what he said was no hair or blood at closing time the Friday before the murder. G W. Jefferson testified that she found the bloodstains with Barrett and that they covered an area "as big as a fan." Doctor and city bacterial scientist and chemist Claude Smith controlled two examples that detectives brought to his office. There are dirt on the chip and some color stains. One of them found some small bodies. The shirt planted at Newt Lee's residence appears to be the same shirt brought to Smith's office by detectives.
Smith checks the stains on the shirt and finds blood stains but no odor from the armpits. The question showed gravel and stains on all chips, and he could not ask him to detect blood. Smith worked in a normal way and the entire surface of the chip was painted with dirt. The most important detail in this text is whether the bloodstain is young or old, with a firm cut shortly after death. Envy Darley, Frank's business partner, testified that Frank nearly lost his mind with excitement after discovering the murder. Dr. Henry F. Harris determined Mary Phagan's death to be close to the time Monteen Stover visited Leo Frank's empty office and stated that he determined the cause of death to be strangulation, despite a prior blunt force trauma, possibly a fist, and her head impact with a sharp object (perhaps a lathe). He also testified that although there was no semen, there had been some violence to Maria's private parts before her death.
Mrs. Arthur White testified that as she walked around she saw a black man hiding near the elevators on the first floor. 1:00 p.m., consistent with the prosecution's theory that the man was Jim Conley, who had spied during Frank's trial. He eventually offers to help Frank move his body.
The United States is Now Sending the Last of Financial Assistance to Ukraine, About 97% of Resources
The United States is now sending the last of financial assistance to Ukraine, about 97% of resources have been exhausted - US State Department
Lux Projects Video
❗The White House declined to comment on Carlson's interview with Vladimir Putin
How to stop being a Globalist slave and take your power back?
https://property.21cuniversity.....com/optin1692252625
Macron wants direct war with Russia over Ukraine. (with subtitles)
Strong 1812 vibes
WATCH: Texas Wild Fires and Directed Energy Weapons